|
Faked?
Sept 17, 2006 20:17:09 GMT -5
Post by Cheshire George on Sept 17, 2006 20:17:09 GMT -5
FP said:
Like I said, if it's that obvious, call the news paper. Or a news channel, doesn't matter.
The problem is, it's not that obvious to everyone. I know from experience that you can be a Beatles fan and not know Ringo from John. I was that kind of fan once... liked the music... didn't give a damn about the people behind it.
|
|
|
Faked?
Sept 17, 2006 23:17:28 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Sept 17, 2006 23:17:28 GMT -5
FP said:
Like I said, if it's that obvious, call the news paper. Or a news channel, doesn't matter. The problem is, it's not that obvious to everyone. I know from experience that you can be a Beatles fan and not know Ringo from John. I was that kind of fan once... liked the music... didn't give a damn about the people behind it. Jojo, yes that's probably right on. My analogy for this "secret" is that it's a bit like a balloon. It's full of air, and when things start to heat up, and the gas inside expands, some of it allowed to escape via a unique and sensitive pressure valve. So, if anyone notices that something has been leaked from the PID balloon, the public will believe that it's just a lot of hot air. Perfect camouflage. A loosely guarded secret survives longest because a windbag makes a case that's lighter than air.
|
|
|
Faked?
Sept 18, 2006 0:24:03 GMT -5
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 18, 2006 0:24:03 GMT -5
Couldn't have said it any better.
|
|
|
Faked?
Sept 23, 2006 18:43:10 GMT -5
Post by Cheshire George on Sept 23, 2006 18:43:10 GMT -5
Thanks for agreeing, Doc, but I'm not JoJo.
|
|
|
Faked?
Sept 24, 2006 9:13:59 GMT -5
Post by JoJo on Sept 24, 2006 9:13:59 GMT -5
Thanks for agreeing, Doc, but I'm not JoJo. I think he meant to reply to another thread.. the one where I said it was simply a well guarded secret rather than a conspiracy.
|
|
|
Faked?
Sept 24, 2006 12:25:57 GMT -5
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 24, 2006 12:25:57 GMT -5
A well guarded secret is one that a few select individuals took part in and/or know something intimately about it or people involved in it....
that has been leaked out so a wider group of individuals who either believe it and want to share it with others, or who don't believe it and want to prove their ideas as being fact and will debate it... but this "wider group" is not a large number either..but looks more like a "cult" or some other fringe group of ecclectic "thinkers" and participaters in.
It's not something that has been exposed to the masses, for either fear that it would be just brushed off, as it had been in this case in 1969 as a hoax, or just kept alive by a small group of people.
A conspiracy, like JFK, like Princess Di, where it was a worldwide event. Though the world may not have been involved in the lives of these people, or just curious about them occasionally, were affected, directly or indirectly by the events of their deaths, and what has been leaked out over the years to feed the fuel of these conspiracies.
It may be confusing for some people reading this to understand. But guarded secrets are not given to the hands of the media to use in a propangdish manner, like 9-11, Columbine, Hurricane Katrina, Oklahoma Bombing, etc to be used as a non stop daily propaganda to drill images into the public's mind and feelings for a specified purpose of paradigm shift in culture.
Something like PID/PWR either has some more serious underlying deception for a long range mind control type of conditioning, perhaps a sinister but more slow working change in people's thinking. More sublte and not as in your face as the "Conspiracies" are handled, yet thoroughly effective.
That's my take on the difference.
The PID/PWR had some attention in 1969 and died out. With Bill continuing to perform as Sir Paul, John Q. Public accepts things as such and just writes off any mention of JPM being killed... They just attribute any discrepancies in facial features as being the use of drugs, old age...etc. A subtle "mind game" played on society.
|
|