|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 7:27:09 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 8, 2006 7:27:09 GMT -5
Why?, because you only want he dead? bad girl Comments like that just make you guys look silly. Of course none of us want him dead & we would like to think that it was JPM himself who helped make C&C such an outstanding album... contrary to "Pauls" previous releases. And there are some regulars here who think just that.... but we are allowed to have other opinions around here. And we are allowed to speculate on the many possibilities of just what happened in 66. FUNNY picture btw,,,, but somebody needs to keep practicing with their photoshop software.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 8:02:27 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Aug 8, 2006 8:02:27 GMT -5
Why?, because you only want he dead? bad girl Comments like that just make you guys look silly. Of course none of us want him dead & we would like to think that it was JPM himself who helped make C&C such an outstanding album... contrary to "Pauls" previous releases. And there are some regulars here who think just that.... but we are allowed to have other opinions around here. And we are allowed to speculate on the many possibilities of just what happened in 66. FUNNY picture btw,,,, but somebody needs to keep practicing with their photoshop software. Hi Eyesbleed, on first is a quetion to SMA, Chris or whatever Lili are, is not for you. (im read more silly comments here than my question) In second place the pic was take from here, casualitie or not the same place from where NIR people take this picSo, here you got the webmaster mail oneeyewillie80@yahoo.com, to talk with him about the photoshop thing. The question is standing still, who is who? Have a nice day.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 9:56:45 GMT -5
Post by Paul Bearer on Aug 8, 2006 9:56:45 GMT -5
Perhaps that photo was planted by EMI as a clue. It looks like two Pauls.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 10:20:17 GMT -5
Post by lili on Aug 8, 2006 10:20:17 GMT -5
I really don't think that it looks like Paul. To be honest, I didn't look at the size of his forehead.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 11:42:52 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Aug 8, 2006 11:42:52 GMT -5
Of course none of us want him dead & we would like to think that it was JPM himself who helped make C&C such an outstanding album... contrary to "Pauls" previous releases. Woowwww, now i know why i dislike so much C&C, JPM comes back to the moon (with diapers included?) and ruin all that exelent work doing by Billy (and his sonwriters team) for decades. anybody remember this old Rolling tune "Child of the moon" ?
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 13:34:58 GMT -5
Post by lili on Aug 8, 2006 13:34:58 GMT -5
Paul looks a little bit uncomfortable in that space suit. It also appears that he is having a re-occurence of Bell's Palsy, as the left side of his face looks a little bit slack. Poor guy. Has anyone seen any photos of "Paul" post November 1966, in which the left side of his face is slack ? The way that I understand it, the virus that causes Bell's Palsy lives in the nerves of the face. Nerves, tiredness & other things can trigger a re-occurence. I don't think that it's curable.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 14:22:17 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Aug 8, 2006 14:22:17 GMT -5
Paul looks a little bit uncomfortable in that space suit. It also appears that he is having a re-occurence of Bell's Palsy, as the left side of his face looks a little bit slack. Poor guy. Has anyone seen any photos of "Paul" post November 1966, in which the left side of his face is slack ? The way that I understand it, the virus that causes Bell's Palsy lives in the nerves of the face. Nerves, tiredness & other things can trigger a re-occurence. I don't think that it's curable. Do you wanna know from where this pic comes from lili? take a look hereYes Lili jpm.org the majority of pics on jpm.org are from magazines released before the end of 66. So if any of those pics were squished or stretched a little, it would be the result of somethin' else.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 15:03:16 GMT -5
Post by lili on Aug 8, 2006 15:03:16 GMT -5
I don't understand what you're trying to say about the spacesuit photo. I have seen that photo many times. I have never questioned that it was the original JPM
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 15:45:40 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Aug 8, 2006 15:45:40 GMT -5
I don't understand what you're trying to say about the spacesuit photo. I have seen that photo many times. I have never questioned that it was the original JPM You are talking about Paul Uneven Jaws (Facial Asymmetry) Lili, because i've got a close friend of mine with this problem. Uneven Jaws (Facial Asymmetry) is the result of over or under developed jaws on one side or the other. Your upper or lower teeth may have shifted over to one side, which can make biting and chewing awkward. In this people their jaws and facial bones are uneven, either through abnormal growth or as a result of an accident. Some of these problems might involve an underdevelopment or overdevelopment of the upper and/or lower jaw, or uneven jaws (facial asymmetry) in which one side of the face is higher or lower than the other or the chin is shifted to one side. As a result of these conditions, speaking, chewing and biting may become difficult, and/or the face may appear “off-balance” and lopsided. Whatever the reason, your teeth and facial bones can be repositioned to create a more balanced relationship so that the jaws will work well together. Common problems that can be dealt with are: • A protruded or retruded chin • Excessive show of gums ie. Gummy smiles • Overall elongation of face • Facial asymmetry www.ndc.com.sg/ForPatientsNVisitors/PatientEducation/OrthogSurgery.htmwww.midlandoralsurgery.com/Jaw_Surgery/jaw_surgery.htmlwww.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Uneven+Jaws+%28Facial+Asymmetry%29&btnG=Google+SearchFar sas i can see Paul allways got his asymmetrical face
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 16:44:16 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 8, 2006 16:44:16 GMT -5
Here is an interesting facial symmetry comparison. Discuss.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 18:27:58 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 8, 2006 18:27:58 GMT -5
Another possibility is that he was wearing colored contact lenses back then to better match Paul's darker eye color. That could have the effect of making the irises look larger. The eyes in this pic are not as odd as in the Pepper gatefold. But in candid pics of the day, this phenomenon doesn't seem to exist. I believe that they are retouched to make Paul look more attractive to his younger female audience. Also, it's amazing how 'Bill' had the same lazy eye that paul did huh? Really, the biggest difference is in the hair style and and mustache.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 20:45:33 GMT -5
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 8, 2006 20:45:33 GMT -5
Khan, impressive but what haapened to the quarter inch of chin you chopped off of JPM?
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 20:47:55 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 8, 2006 20:47:55 GMT -5
You guys sure are entertainin' sometimes. Y'all seem to be so defensive & take this stuff personally or somethin'. Why would I care where that picture comes from or waste any of my valuable time writting the webmaster? That's what I call bein' silly & overreacting. I mentioned photoshop coz that was the first thing to come to mind with this particular pic. DISCLAIMER: This next sentence is my personal opinion & not that of the forum. I don't think there are or could be any pics of JPM after 66. 99% of the pics are instantly obvious as to who it is, but there is that occational pic that has me wonderin'... what's goin' on... BUT this isn't one of those. This pic just looks way to convenient & way too easy. It isn't good enough to have me wonderin', so the next response is photoshop. You guys save yerself the trouble & don't go postin' dozens upon dozens of post 66 "Pauls" for me coz I'm not gonna have the time to mess with it.... but... knock yerselves out if it'll make ya happy.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 8, 2006 21:22:53 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 8, 2006 21:22:53 GMT -5
Khan, impressive but what haapened to the quarter inch of chin you chopped off of JPM? Sorry. Damn magnetic lasso tool. If it were cropped correctly it would actually match up better. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 10:02:46 GMT -5
Post by lili on Aug 9, 2006 10:02:46 GMT -5
I really don't think that the guy with Bill & Linda is Paul. 1st of all, his arm is noticeably free of hair. Paul was a hairy little bugger. Bill has hairy arms, but the hair stops at his wrist. Paul's hair ran down the back of his hands. I do wonder if he could be one of the other people who filled in for Paul, before Bill took over the job permanently.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 12:02:20 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 9, 2006 12:02:20 GMT -5
I know how much you guys love these. So here is the same comparison in reverse.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 12:07:25 GMT -5
Post by noodles on Aug 9, 2006 12:07:25 GMT -5
Anyone ever done a neck length comparison? Watch his shoulders go up and down.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 13:40:21 GMT -5
Post by lili on Aug 9, 2006 13:40:21 GMT -5
Nice one, Noodles.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 17:00:21 GMT -5
Post by FP on Aug 9, 2006 17:00:21 GMT -5
Nice one, Noodles. Nice what? It's KHAN's fade.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 17:57:18 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 9, 2006 17:57:18 GMT -5
Nice one, Noodles. Nice what? It's KHAN's fade. I think they are saying that the necks and shoulders don't match. ...which of course makes no sense since they are sitting/standing in different positions. Just another example of ignoring the obvious, and focusing on the irrelevant.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 20:01:49 GMT -5
Post by revolver on Aug 9, 2006 20:01:49 GMT -5
Let's focus on the eyes for a moment. Bill's eyes look quite different from Paul's in those photos. The animation just makes that clearer. I don't see somebody's eyes changing like that in a few years or even longer, drugs or no drugs. His left eyebrow is noticably different as well. Bill's a reasonable facsimile, but not the same guy. The "eyes" have it.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 20:08:42 GMT -5
Post by FP on Aug 9, 2006 20:08:42 GMT -5
I don't see somebody's eyes changing like that in a few years or even longer, drugs or no drugs. What about lighting?
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 20:18:08 GMT -5
Post by KHAN on Aug 9, 2006 20:18:08 GMT -5
His left eyebrow is noticably different as well. '67 Paul's left eyebrow is showing the scars from the moped accident in '66. His eyebrows have always reacted exactly the same.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 9, 2006 22:03:47 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 9, 2006 22:03:47 GMT -5
They can do lots of things.... but no matter what, they can't change the shape of a guys skull & they can't put JPM's soul into the other guys eyes.
|
|
|
Faked?
Aug 10, 2006 12:58:29 GMT -5
Post by noodles on Aug 10, 2006 12:58:29 GMT -5
Nice what? It's KHAN's fade. I think they are saying that the necks and shoulders don't match. ...which of course makes no sense since they are sitting/standing in different positions. Just another example of ignoring the obvious, and focusing on the irrelevant. Please can you post up the full bodied original photos so we can see how they were 'sitting/standing'. Thanks.
|
|