|
Post by superman on Jan 16, 2017 16:01:51 GMT -5
Don't have time to look for it right now, but didn't ACV say something like 3 heard and 2 seen after '70?
look at 10:05
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 16, 2017 16:32:32 GMT -5
Apollo has intimated, however, that JPM did return in some form. FWIW, I asked Apollo where after 1966 would I look for evidence of JPM's return. His response " the White Album ( to some extent) and Abbey Rd." ACV told me the same - Pepper, TWA, Abbey R. - and as far as bass work - that John and Geo could do some. And Klaus V. to name some names. Hi Ramone, "Ram on" must mean something to Paul cause it was a pseudonym and the title of a song and "Ram" was the title of an album. To me, Paul being back would mean being with the band that recorded under the Beatles name, though it had changed. That would include playing bass, since that is mostly what he did before and that is what Apollo wrote he did on Pepper "mainly". Now I'm very happy to learn that Apollo wrote he played on TWA and Abbey Road as well. Many thanks to you and Red Lion That means he was back and he was very alive. I'm interested by all the other things Apollo wrote that are not in the summary and that would shed more light on what happened.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 17, 2017 0:59:22 GMT -5
Not to belabor the Bewitched analogy, but Apollo was incorrect. Dick York was not replaced because he passed, he resigned due to chronic health issues and was addicted to painkillers....he died in the early 90s.
RAMONe........I asked Apollo as to how many entities have played the role of Paul McCartney since 1970...his answer "2 by eye, 3 by ear"
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 17, 2017 9:30:48 GMT -5
Red Lion and Ramone,
did Apollo say if Phil Ackrill was a replacement for Paul or not?
He's so popular on these boards that I think it may be true that he was involved in some way.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 17, 2017 10:59:58 GMT -5
Just use common sense when it comes to stuff like Phil Ackrill.....he has nothing to do with anything. Try to rigorously promote the the most outrageous, ridiculous, baseless theory you can on these message boards and you will gain a following. Not only that but in a short time people will swear it was gospel.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 17, 2017 14:04:05 GMT -5
Just use common sense when it comes to stuff like Phil Ackrill.....he has nothing to do with anything. Try to rigorously promote the the most outrageous, ridiculous, baseless theory you can on these message boards and you will gain a following. Not only that but in a short time people will swear it was gospel. Hi Red Lion, I agree there are a lot of things that are not true in all these boards, websites and videos. But sometimes, they may start with a little bit of truth that is then turned into falsehood by people adding crazy things to it. I'd say that four things point to the possibility of Phil Ackrill as one of Paul's replacements who would have kept working with him when he came back: - the fact that he supposedly left the music business in 64 - the name Faul that could be Phaul instead - the mention of "with the Philly band" in the song "Venus and Mars" www.metrolyrics.com/venus-and-marsrock-show-lyrics-paul-mccartney.html- his relationship with another possible replacement who is the most obvious among these three that Apollo mentioned: ' A coin, a sheep, a favored son, were welcomed guest when the day was done.' 'It would stagger the mind in knowing just how many different souls it took to replace just “one.” '
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2017 14:30:53 GMT -5
lol 'It would stagger the mind in knowing just how many different souls it took to replace just “one.” More souls than you will ever be able to count! Lucy (is the sky…) You are the “one.” Was there ever any doubt? You have the talent to “see” what others have missed. There will never be an end to this saga. Not in any of my wildest dreams did I ever expect this to continue as it has. Needless to say there have been, and continue to be, flights of fancy that are beyond the beyond, and beyond. It serves to muddy the waters, but also to seek out those smart enough not to be fooled. As badly as everyone wants the “answer”, those that have found it walk away in disbelief. Seems the picture doesn’t quite fit the frame. Einstein, (disguised as Robin Hood) once said “Imagination is more important than knowledge.” Seems to sum this up in a tidy little package. As far as I am concerned, words fail to describe what is currently going on in my life. This too shall pass. My only concern is where I will end up in the wake of events. My advice to you is continue looking at life with child like wonder. You’ll be surprised how beautiful things look when seen through a fresh pair of eyes. Do I need to worry about you? You remain in my thoughts and prayers and “visions”.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 18, 2017 9:55:09 GMT -5
Are there two different "Pauls" going around RIGHT NOW? Seems like it. The guy who was denied entry into that party thrown by Kylie Jenner's husband in February does not look like the Paul who performed at Minneapolis' target center in May. But maybe its my old eyes. Hi Superman, certainly, there are at least two. There were these six around 2010: i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Nancy_PID_mccartney.jpgAs they are all getting rather old, it is possible they may get sick or die and there has to be some new doubles. The real Paul turns 75 this year. Some people who seem to want him to be dead may get their wish any day.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 18, 2017 14:07:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by superman on Jan 18, 2017 20:20:23 GMT -5
I dunno, English folk are unassumingly rugged. "You know those British guys live forever. You know Ozzy Osbourne? He's gonna outlive Miley Cyrus."
- Sean "P. Diddy" Combs
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jan 18, 2017 22:20:04 GMT -5
I agree that there seem to be more than one Faul but many of those British guys that we think should be dead ARE dead! Ozzy was replaced and Keith Richards was replaced many times!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 18, 2017 22:39:43 GMT -5
Ozzy was replaced and Keith Richards was replaced many times! Rabbit, see?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Jan 19, 2017 7:25:27 GMT -5
Here is Phil Ackrill's email; philackrill@btinternet.com why not drop him a line? Just use common sense when it comes to stuff like Phil Ackrill.....he has nothing to do with anything. Try to rigorously promote the the most outrageous, ridiculous, baseless theory you can on these message boards and you will gain a following. Not only that but in a short time people will swear it was gospel. Hi Red Lion, I agree there are a lot of things that are not true in all these boards, websites and videos. But sometimes, they may start with a little bit of truth that is then turned into falsehood by people adding crazy things to it. I'd say that four things point to the possibility of Phil Ackrill as one of Paul's replacements who would have kept working with him when he came back: - the fact that he supposedly left the music business in 64 - the name Faul that could be Phaul instead - the mention of "with the Philly band" in the song "Venus and Mars" www.metrolyrics.com/venus-and-marsrock-show-lyrics-paul-mccartney.html- his relationship with another possible replacement who is the most obvious among these three that Apollo mentioned: ' A coin, a sheep, a favored son, were welcomed guest when the day was done.' 'It would stagger the mind in knowing just how many different souls it took to replace just “one.” '
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Jan 19, 2017 7:31:25 GMT -5
Flats - Heels - Heels - Heels - Flats - Flats Are there two different "Pauls" going around RIGHT NOW? Seems like it. The guy who was denied entry into that party thrown by Kylie Jenner's husband in February does not look like the Paul who performed at Minneapolis' target center in May. But maybe its my old eyes. Hi Superman, certainly, there are at least two. There were these six around 2010: i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo110/faulconandsnowjob/Nancy_PID_mccartney.jpgAs they are all getting rather old, it is possible they may get sick or die and there has to be some new doubles. The real Paul turns 75 this year. Some people who seem to want him to be dead may get their wish any day.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 19, 2017 16:39:24 GMT -5
"Flats - Heels - Heels - Heels - Flats - Flats"
Paul sure wears a lot of different shoes lol
(Sunking should be swinging thru anytime now)
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 19, 2017 16:50:11 GMT -5
Ozzy was replaced and Keith Richards was replaced many times! Rabbit, see? Hold on RL, are you saying Ozzy Oddball wasn't replaced? If he wasn't, well... that's it, I'm turning in my E(verybody)WR hat. There's just no point I say, no point! Wooooooooooo!
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 19, 2017 17:09:19 GMT -5
It's not him; it's her that keeps changing! Go ask Alice (Nancy) when she's ten feet tall!
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 19, 2017 17:16:45 GMT -5
Very Slick!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 19, 2017 18:15:56 GMT -5
Hold on RL, are you saying Ozzy Oddball wasn't replaced? If he wasn't, well... that's it, I'm turning in my E(verybody)WR hat. There's just no point I say, no point! Wooooooooooo!
RAMONe, please retreat to your safe space.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 19, 2017 21:16:54 GMT -5
That exists? Now you tell me. lol
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 19, 2017 21:18:47 GMT -5
Here is Phil Ackrill's email; philackrill@btinternet.com why not drop him a line? Hi Beacon, I would like to write to him, although I' m sure that asking him directly if he replaced Paul McCartney would probably get a "no" or "no reply". And if he said "yes", it could be a joke. Apollo wrote: ' It was agreed, BY ALL INVOLVED, that once the “story” is told, not to deviate from any previous statements. You know, and I know, that there ARE clues to be found on Pepper. Just what those “clues” allude to, has not yet been figured out. But, when asked of John, George, or Ringo, the “total rubbish” response. That is the story line. Deny! ' I would have to find something clever to ask, that would make him answer without answering, if you know what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 19, 2017 21:39:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 19, 2017 21:47:31 GMT -5
Here is Phil Ackrill's email; philackrill@btinternet.com why not drop him a line? Hi Beacon, I would like to write to him, although I' m sure that asking him directly if he replaced Paul McCartney would probably get a "no" or "no reply". And if he said "yes", it could be a joke. Apollo wrote: ' It was agreed, BY ALL INVOLVED, that once the “story” is told, not to deviate from any previous statements. You know, and I know, that there ARE clues to be found on Pepper. Just what those “clues” allude to, has not yet been figured out. But, when asked of John, George, or Ringo, the “total rubbish” response. That is the story line. Deny! ' I would have to find something clever to ask,that would make him answer without answering, if you know what I mean. Ask him if he has an alibi for the last few decades; if you know what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 21, 2017 10:46:26 GMT -5
we've read over some of this apollo c vermouth stuff and it's semi-aphoristic nonsense that only breeds more nonsense. one paul from 1942 to 1966, and one faul from 1966 to whenever - and, that's according to all available photo-evidence
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 21, 2017 11:52:46 GMT -5
we've read over some of this apollo c vermouth stuff and it's semi-aphoristic nonsense that only breeds more nonsense. one paul from 1942 to 1966, and one faul from 1966 to whenever - and, that's according to all available photo-evidence Well, isn't that what this is all about? Is it true PWR. A few Fauls or one - even if just the latter, then that's huge. That's THE thing. We should give a shout out to Jojo, and B, RL and others that help keep or have helped keep this board up running - giving us a room to gather and throw things back and forth as far as ideas. Jojo has had a balanced view of this over the years - only stepping in rarely when needed. Letting ideas (and differing ones) be presented. And the mods have carried on with this overall. Personally, I think it can be a good thing to stretch and get a little out there as far as exploring things - but, always keep at least one foot tethered to center. Stay grounded - come back to earth as needed to re-navigate. There are times when an 'out there' thought might have some validity but probably a lot of it doesn't - and that's where the tethering comes in.
|
|