|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 11, 2010 23:41:01 GMT -5
Along Comes Mary - The Association
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 17, 2009 22:45:03 GMT -5
67ish I would say, but it is attached.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 16, 2009 23:13:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Nov 29, 2009 11:57:30 GMT -5
Happy Birthday -j !
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Nov 13, 2009 21:51:30 GMT -5
I really don't think it's Juber. The hair's wrong (not even the same growth - wave wise - ask a cosmetologist) and he doesn't look as close to the JPM pics as guitar guy. JPM and g. guy are almost a lock. Again, who's likely to be at a wings session AND look that close to JPM?
All valid points, I just have some doubts, as the look is similar but not compelling enough for me to say its JPM.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Nov 13, 2009 15:49:38 GMT -5
But in the Rockestra picture I posted Juber's hair is longer and shaggier. Could he have grown his hair out that much in a month's (or less) time between recording sessions?
You're correct there. Dunno what to think of the studio pic. On one hand there is a resemblance to Paul on the other it doesn't scream out "JPM" like the boat photo.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Nov 12, 2009 15:55:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Oct 22, 2009 0:34:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Sept 29, 2009 22:50:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 26, 2009 15:32:53 GMT -5
So in do you think it only makes sense to discuss this if you believe PWR?
Since I don't, I have no business discussing it?
Other than promoting your already known opinion regarding this topic, what would you hope to accomplish here?
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 25, 2009 19:00:39 GMT -5
Could you be more specific? 'Cause all i see is the exactly the same guy.. Please be more specific... where do you see differences in the above?
No offense, but I have lost the desire to debate subtle nuances in photos. My interest in this matter lies elsewhere. I will say, however, that when viewing post '66 pics I have no attachment to who I see in them. And there are more than few photos where I see JPM, some of which I have posted on the main board.
You see the same guy? I can respect that.
Cheers.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 24, 2009 22:13:47 GMT -5
Now please elaborate, how you think "he doesn't resemble him at all"?
Some are close, some are not. You may even have one in there that actually shows JPM. The Pepper cover and pictures (in uniform) definitely not the original, and the MMT movie....forget it. I tend to see JPM more in the '68-'69 era.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 23, 2009 22:44:02 GMT -5
Red Lion sees Paul after '66
I think a few '68-'69 pics show JPM. Pepper and MMT clearly show, for the most part, someone who does not resemble the original at all.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 10, 2009 0:20:08 GMT -5
I've had it happen to me about 6 or 7 times. Terrible experience, complete terror including presence of an entity. If you have ever experienced it, please share.
I happen to know a tad about this subject. Your conciousness has moved to the infrared area of the electromagnetic spectrum. So although your mind is awake and aware, your body is asleep and in paralysis. With infrared being the place that ghosts and such hang out, it is very common to feel other entities present while experiencing this state. In nearly all cases, while a bit freaky, no actual harm is done. For me personally, I have a had something run in circles around my bed while I lay frozen.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 1, 2009 23:10:01 GMT -5
I will try and take a stab at cracking what this Cry Baby Cry code is. If anyone else is interested, please, be my geust.
Apollo always said it all goes back to Pepper. I'm intrigued Jarv.
The confusion being the King and Queen. One represents Eppie, the other is George. The "children" are most certainly the "lads." The context of the "seance" being put on for a "lark" was to cover for ones "death." The "duke" was Bill.
Apollo
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 30, 2009 21:16:18 GMT -5
Very clever jarv, carry on!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 25, 2009 23:59:41 GMT -5
I'm tired of the "doctored" bull**it
I'm tired of reading your posts. What are you doing here?
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 15, 2009 10:44:39 GMT -5
Thanks il ras, please put it up as soon as possible!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 4, 2009 12:07:07 GMT -5
Wow, good stuff JoJo, especially the confirmation of Tara's spouse and the fact that Mike took the infamous moped accident photo.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 25, 2009 7:09:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 16, 2009 3:11:22 GMT -5
What's your theory, then?
Paul was replaced, that is what we know. There is at best anecdotal evidence of death, which hardly proves anything. Furthermore, there is zero evidence that he was killed/murdered or that the "nati" were involved. Your theory is highly contrived.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 16, 2009 0:53:03 GMT -5
The Illuminati theory explaining what happened to Paul is the one that makes the most sense
It's a theory backed up by a donut hole.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 15, 2009 22:58:13 GMT -5
It's not a question of whether the Illuminati exists or not, as it is if they are involved with the replacement issue. And there is nothing to indicate that they are.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 15, 2009 22:44:38 GMT -5
That's because there isn't one.
LOL, right on B.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 13, 2009 1:55:29 GMT -5
Well, there is your definitive answer.
|
|