|
Post by beacon on Oct 1, 2013 8:09:10 GMT -5
Came across this on one of my recent sojourns across the world wide web:- It is an unfortunate place to have put the copyright mark; however, could it be Paul with his double and with his other, occasional, stand in Neil Aspinall? In all seriousness it is apparently a fan photo from around the Sgt Pepper era; possibly the within you, without you session I read, that was for sale on craigslist. Unfortunately I can't find a clean version.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Oct 1, 2013 5:36:31 GMT -5
I enjoyed watching it but clearly it's fake - George Harrison supposedly saying this from his hospital bed after an attempted stabbing which affected his lungs and saying it in such a flowing way. The accent sounds similar but is a good imitator. Who made this? Is it another Neil Aspinall/Ringo Starr/possibly Paul or whoever he now is McCartney effort to do a Winged Beetle in a different way? Neill was alive then. It's all very clever but it leave you wondering if this whole PID effort now is not simply a way to make money. There are reasons to believe the Beatles were never as rich as people thought and what we now know about Brian Epstein's serious gambling problems and debts to the Krays makes you wonder if some of their money was spent that way. We also have interesting questions about just what EMI's purpose was other than making music and who controlled it. Somebody on here some time ago, can't remember the thread, suggested that Paul was broke around the time he created Wings. Perhaps this is all about money, it often is. ticket2ride; be under no illusions, this is a fake. It was made by a guy called Joel Gilbert for Highway 61 productions and features a frankly insulting attempt at a Liverpool accent. Poor George would be spinning in his grave if he could hear this laughable attempt at mimicry. I am not aware of any Aspinall/Starr or McCartney involvement, though I am surprised that McCartney, MPL or Apple haven't had it squashed. However, lest anyone doubt that it is a fake, here is a screenshot from Highway 61's website that declares the video to be a spoof mockumentary!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Oct 1, 2013 4:35:02 GMT -5
Well people, you can finally lay all your worries to rest because you are going to hear exactly what happened to Paul McCartney and not only that you can prove it to yourself beyond any shadow of a doubt. There is absolutely no doubt that Paul, during the autumn of 1966 disappeared from public view, perhaps doubles were used in his absence and the Beatles changed forever. They stopped touring and performing live, changed their style of music and became different people. Something happened which changed this band forever and their attitude toward life and 'that' something happened to Paul McCartney, Heather Mills knows it and so do a lot of people. All the clues in the album covers are aimed at telling you that Paul is different from what he used to be but the subliminal backwards messages in the music such as 'Paul is dead' are unfortunately rubbish. I have analyzed all of them and apart from the obvious ones that are innocent the rest of them under advanced sound software prove to be fictitious. The Beatles when they did the Sg Pepper album were indeed telling us something and that was that the old Beatles which we all loved, the Beatles who were essentially a live band were now unable to tour anymore and were indeed - dead. I have proved with sound analysis software (over in the clues section) that the Paul McCartney of 1963 is indeed the Paul McCartney that is still producing music today, there can be no argument about that at all. So....what happened to Paul that would change his life and the life of the Beatles forever? Take a look at this picture: View AttachmentDo you know what this is? It's the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim. Take as look at the next picture: View AttachmentDo you know what this is? Its the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim but with a difference. The lower left side of his face has been reconstructed after the stroke complete with scars. You remember I posted this? View AttachmentI mentioned the pin protruding out of Paul's lower jaw on the left as we look at him. Do you know what that pin is? That pin is part of a mechanism which held Paul's face level all the time he had surgery to correct the damage the stroke did. Originally he had two of them, one on either side with a connecting rod between the two and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul. But in the picture of Paul above (the second one down of Paul's full face) we can see other tell tale signs besides the surgery scars. His left eye still has stroke damage which was to be corrected in later surgery. The lower eyelid muscles departing from the rest of the eye. I could show you a thousand pictures of the same damage to many stroke victims but I won't because you can go look for yourselves. In the above picture we can see the scars from the 1960's and indeed the scars from a modern Paul on his face in the same places. When this happened to Paul they must have thought it was all over for the Beatles, the doctors would have said Paul can never tour again and had to take it easy for the rest of his life. Ringo being consoled by Paul on Sg Pepper isn't because Paul is dead its because Ringo loved playing live and touring and took the news badly and Paul consoles him. That poor lad, in his prime struck down by this terrible affliction, there is no wonder it did what it did to the band. So.......no more tours and it takes a lot of operations to put Paul's face to something like he used to look and his life and the band are changed forever. Research it yourselves, you'll form the same conclusions as I did. Paul had a stroke and some clues are in Lennon's lyrics. As for Paul's later life...well he probably said stuff it after a while, I'm gonna just live and formed Wings. The rest is history. The reason they didn't tell us? your guess is as good as mine. Sleep well people. thewalrus1966 this is an interesting theory and reminds me of a discussion over at tkin some years ago speculating that Paul may have had Bells Palsy. I do feel it needs some further elaboration though. When I look at your picture of Paul I don't see the droopy mouth, nor do I see the evidence of the pin. I see a line that seems to go from beneath the tip of his moustache and continues down onto his neck. This seems to be a continous line that doesn't account for the contours of the face. Also, your quote... and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul.Where is this from? Essentially, there is a three month window from the Melody Maker awards in August 66 until his reappearance from Kenya on November 19 1966 for Paul to have recovered from this stroke, unless of course doubles were used, in which case we are not really any wiser as to who they are and to what extent they were used. Three months seems to be a very quick time for a recovery, even for a young man. I am not saying your theory is incorrect but I would like to see you post some more details. Also, I am very interested in your voice analysis results, but can you explain it in layman terms? All I see is a series of graphs but I am not sure what the corelation is between the various source interviews, or, between the top and bottom graphs. Can you help?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 27, 2013 10:37:13 GMT -5
Pardon the intrusion... To respond to the "Iamaphoney" debate, I can assure you that he is not Giles, Dhani, or Zak. Nor was he tied in with Aspinall or Apple in any way, shape, or form. Sorry to burst any bubbles. Seems like a good theory but this swan fades to black... APOV Oh well, there goes that theory!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 27, 2013 8:53:25 GMT -5
From the Washington PA, Observer-Reporter October 31, 1973
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 27, 2013 8:33:54 GMT -5
Do check out the story of Terry Knight/GFR. You'll find he was just as nasty as any Peter Grant or Allen Klein. Interesting quote from here"I never made more than that group,"Knight said. "That's the most ludicrous, insane statement anybody could ever make. And the courts proved it. You know, most managers today make upwards of 25 per cent. My commission was only 15 per cent, after all expenses. Not off the top."
"Now, let's talk about the split for the record, shall we? When they call me from New England, broke, no money to buy Wheaties, I wire them money and bring them back home," Knight said. 'And I get them drums from Ludwig, because they didn't have any, I get them guitars from Steve Marriott [of Humble Pie], 'cause they didn't have any, okay? They [had] hocked theirs. They didn't have shit. And now," Knight said, "I make a record, and I get the money, only because Terry Knight was known. You have to keep in mind that Terry Knight was a recording artist and wellknown personality before Grand Funk learned to go poo--poo."
"It was my money bringing 'em back from Cape Cod, my money getting them instruments, my money paying for the trips to the Atlanta Pop Festival and the Texas Pop Festival, my dollars that paid streets and flying to New York mid Califomia, twice to every record company in the business." "It was my influence on Mauri Lathower at Capitol Records which got 'em accepted," Knight continued 'And it was my popularity and reputation that got them air play - and they have the audacity to take offense?"
"They didn't record for Capitol Records," Knight again pointed out. "They never signed with Capitol Records. They signed to me, to Good Knight Productions. Do you know of any record company that makes less than the artist? I mean, certainly Capitol made more than The Beatles." "The fact is that I was also their mentor, their manager, their publisher, as well as being their producer, and in effect the record Company. You know, you pay a producer normally, like they paid Todd Rundgren, and Frank Zappa.
They forget what a great little deal they had with me they got .Terry Knight as part of the bargain, who produced all those multi-platinum albums for them, the ones that are still selling," Knight said. Terry Knight looked out the window onto the sunny patio area outside the door of his comfortable home. Certain things, certain thoughts, about the past can rile him, and did. But he prefers to think about his life now, and is happy in his role as a single parent Terry mused, "Everybody has an ego".
That's a psychiatric fact. But not everybody has a superego. That's a rare gift. "I think the people that I know recognized it, like I did, at an early age. To have recognized it back then makes me more grateful than you'll know. Because it's what gave me the incentive to be able to believe the absurdity that there wasn't a day when I wasn't in control.
But that doesn't mean that I was in control," Knight explained, "I just believed I was in control. You can be humble, you can be shy, you can be anything you want to be," Knight said "You'll just have to believe that you are in complete control. As long as you believe you control it, you can't get a bad answer"
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 27, 2013 8:04:16 GMT -5
Do check out the story of Terry Knight/GFR. You'll find he was just as nasty as any Peter Grant or Allen Klein. Yes, you are right he certainly screwed them over. Here is a bit more detail, from Knight, about how Saint Paul came to be... Extract from Terry Knight interview. PSF: Do you recall meeting McCartney [in 1968]?
TK: Yes, I recall meeting McCartney very well. We first met in Detroit and shared a brief hello. Later, he called me to England, Apple bought me a plane ticket, he invited me to sing. We had lunch in London with Linda and Twiggy, Roger Moore and Peter Sellers - and then I went to the studio where Yoko and Ringo and everyone else was assembled. It was the session where it was over [Ringo walked out during White Album sessions]. I went back to New York empty-handed and wrote the song "Saint Paul" on the flight.
PSF: Are you aware that the song is credited with starting the "Paul-is-dead" rumor?
TK: [Smile.] Oh, yes, I've heard that before. Here we get a slightly different version... While down in Florida for a gig, Knight began hanging out with the gorgeous young waif of a British model known as Twiggy. She was the apex of mod Sixties fashion in swinging London, the toast of Carnaby Street, and Knight (of course) was smitten. Twiggy, who was quickly developing into an actress and performer to go along with her modeling career, knew all the cool people in London, and she took a liking to this guy Terry Knight.
"Twiggy put me on tour with her, to warm up the audience with a few songs with the guitar," he recalled. "And then they’d introduce her, on this great Revlon [cosmetics] U.S. tour, when she was at her peak. One night I was in a hotel room in Miami, singing these songs. And she just fell in love with the songs - and me, I guess. We never had a romantic relationship, but we were very, very close."
"The following day," Knight recalled, "Justin, her manager and boyfriend, came in the room and said, "You have a long distance call from England. You better come and take it - it's in my room." So I raced to his room, pick it up: "Hello" [Knight doing proper British accent]: "Terry Knight?" [Knight]: "Yeah?" [English guy]: "This is Paul McCartney." [Knight]: "Yeah, who the fuck is it, really?"
"Anyway, it was Paul," Knight said. "Twiggy had recently discovered an unknown girl named Mary Hopkin. Mary had done a wonderful record for Paul called "Those Were The Days." And she had discovered James Taylor, by the way, for Apple. Paul was told by Twiggy that he dare not miss the opportunity to sign Terry Knight!"
"Just as Paul stated on the phone, there was an airline ticket [reserved for Terry Knight], first-class, to and from London, England," Knight said. "I got to England just as The Beatles broke up. I was actually present at the studio the night the whole shit fell apart."
The time period would naturally have to be late 1968, during the time The Beatles were finishing up recording of The White Album, when the group very nearly did break up, before coming back together for another year or so. Ringo had walked out on the others, apparently right before Knight arrived in London. Terry also mentioned that he recalled seeing Bob Dylan hanging around the studio with the remaining Beatles.
"Before flying back," Knight said, "I learned Graham Nash had just left The Hollies. Tony Hicks of The Hollies came over to Ringo's flat, where I was staying, and offered me Graham's job, with The Hollies. I turned it down."
"I did not want to be a frontman anymore, ever," Knight said. "The experience with The Pack was so devastating to me, going through egos was just not part of my plan again - unless I was in control of them. So I said no politely, thanked him, and came back to America."
The ironic thing was that, after McCartney had summoned Knight to London, paid for his trip and arranged for him to be put up at Ringo's flat, he didn't even have time to see Knight. The problems The Beatles were experiencing right at that moment precluded McCartney from considering what talents Knight might have to offer Apple Records.
On that TWA flight back from England, Knight said, "I wrote a song, which I recorded myself for Capitol, called "Saint Paul." It was about McCartney. I went back to Cleveland to record it, and used the entire Cleveland Symphony Orchestra. My buddy, Joe Walsh, sat in on the session. Anyway, that's how Paul and I met. I met Ringo in Detroit, and George in Detroit, but was never really close or friendly with either of them."
"Saint Paul" is a Beatles curio, to be sure, and perhaps the most interesting record that Terry Knight made as a singer. (It was also one of his final attempts to make it as a vocalist.) Capitol did release it, and apparently Paul didn't mind being the subject of the song, but he did mind that Terry had borrowed melodies and/or recognizable passages and lyrics from various Beatles songs, which included "Hey Jude," "Strawberry Fields," "A Day In The Life," "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds," "All You Need Is Love" and even "She Loves You".
And hereTwiggy and her manager, Justin De Villeneuve, persuaded Terry to record once again and invited him back to London to meet Paul McCartney. Terry remembers it this way, "When I arrived in England, I found Paul tied up preparing arrangements for Mary Hopkin's new Lp and was much too busy to go into serious discussion at the time." Interestingly enough, it was Twiggy who had brought Mary Hopkin to Apple after seeing her on a British TV program. Before Terry had left for England, Capitol Records had contacted him, inquiring about his availability as a recording artist. "They came up with some very interesting proposals but I felt that I owed it to myself and to Twiggy to follow up her lead first."Not sure how much I believe, but, interesting none the less.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 26, 2013 5:25:28 GMT -5
Haven't found a single thing stating any Beatle attended Browne's funeral, let alone McCartney. That is most odd considering the people who attended Tara's 21st birthday party. I also agree, that George Martin was doing the composing of those musical scores and putting it out under the name of Paul McCartney. Those kind of "instrumental soundtracks" never sold well anyway. It also diversified Paul/Faul as a bona fide multi faceted musician moving away from the left handed bass player image. I think that as well as George Martin having a big input/composing music etc that there were other people writing a good deal of that Lennon/McCartney material as well as Mal Evans input; people like Donovan I feel may have "ghostwritten" songs (he went to Rishikesh too so was in that inner circle: fading from the music scene at the height of his popularity having written "Jennifer Juniper" for Pattie Harrison's sister Jenny Boyd); I ask the question, was he on the payroll? You mention about the members of Wings not getting paid. There was a story by Denny Laine in a British Sunday paper saying that he was paid £50 per week. Denny Laine had also sold the copyright of his best song, "Go Now" which was a number one hit for the Moody Blues when he was lead singer in 1964. He sold the copyright to skiffle singer, Lonnie Donegan when the group were broke for £50. Denny's ex wife Jo Jo (the Jo Jo in "Get Back") died in 1994 after falling down the stairs. As for Jimmy McCullough, he had been working with Steve Marriott in a Small Faces revival before he was found dead in his flat. Personally, I am not surprised that none of the Beatles attended Tara Browne's funeral. None of them attended Brian Epstein's! This obituary says it was a family affair. Tara is buried at the family estate at Lugalla in Ireland where there is a memorial for him. Maybe Paul secretly visited at some point? I found this comment recently - the bottom one - which is probably fake, but made me wonder. Anonymous unfortunately. P.S. Jojo was a man who thought he was a loner, But he knew it couldn't last, Jojo left his home in Tucson, Arizona, For some California grass Most likely refers to Linda McCartney's first husband Joseph Melville See who committed suicide. Never seen a photo of the guy though!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 10:05:55 GMT -5
If you've ever heard that American broadcast of an interview with Paul McCartney about his death, where he says he's on a farm in Scotland --- that has NEVER sounded to me like Paul McCartney speaking. It sounds like someone faking a Liverpool accent. I just heard it again the other day and I always laugh at how unlike McCartney this person sounds. The American broadcaster ends with "Thank you Mr.McCartney." I'll have to see if I stumble across this audio clip again. Yeah, I use that clip at the end of my latest video. I believe it was Tony Bramwell impersonating McCartney.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 7:48:32 GMT -5
You should see Crispian Mills's (Hayley's son) "A Fantastic Fear of Everything" a tale of abandoned children in LILY'S laundrette, where one grows up to be a serial killer through this abandonment. It stars Simon Pegg. It also mentions Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen (September 11, 1862 – November 23, 1910), usually known as Dr. Crippen. When his name came up it just reminds me of that International Times advertisement looking by a Black Magic director whatever, who lived around that same area as Crippen did. VERY interesting film. When I saw the LILY and the subject matter I thought .... HMMMMMMM. Interesting. I have neither seen the film nor did I know about the John Mills thing. I will do some reasearch. i did know about Crispian Mills though, as he was in a modestly popular band back in the 90's called Kula Shaker who had a lot of eastern references in their songs and lyrics. Interestingly Crispian's father is Roy Boulting who, with his twin brother, directed The Family Way. Small World! Ah, Heather Mills father not Hayley Mills father, forgive the confusion!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 6:43:17 GMT -5
Some issues about this concern me and I am wondering about a few points. the top image is a wire picture sent out on October 22 1969 to deny reports of Paul's death. In it he has considerably longer hair than on the cover of Life. Obviously the wire picture may not have been totally recent, but, it implies it is of him in London. I am wondering when the Life interview was conducted? It appeared on November 7, 1969, and I am reliably informed that it would have had to have happened at least eight days prior to have made the issue, so 29/30 October? Likewise, the traditional reports of the time imply that McCartney was in Scotland for the duration of this event. Was he in London or Scotland? Beatles Bible website implies he travelled to Scotland on the 22nd, however, it does not say from where. I am wondering though if the Life interview may have been done quite some time before, knowing that the media shitstorm was about to hit and so having the oppposite spin already in the bag. Does anyone know the date of the interview? Another reason for my thinking is that in this film footage of reporters harrassing McCartney at his farm he has a well developed beard which is not present in either the wire photo or the Life cover. Now, presumably, this all happened around the same time. Does anyone have a date for this film footage? Also, does anyone know if Terry Kinght's Saint Paul single was re-issued in November 69. If not, then what was the purpose of the Cash Box ad, as, I am guessing, the single would have been out of print by then?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 5:36:17 GMT -5
Interesting that The Family Way stars Hayley Mills, who is most well-known for her role in Disney's Parent Trap, about identical cousins. Also interesting that her last name is Mills. Last summer somebody was on here mentioning that there is evidence that Heather Mills' father was associated with cloning research near Brecon Beacons. You should see Crispian Mills's (Hayley's son) "A Fantastic Fear of Everything" a tale of abandoned children in LILY'S laundrette, where one grows up to be a serial killer through this abandonment. It stars Simon Pegg. It also mentions Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen (September 11, 1862 – November 23, 1910), usually known as Dr. Crippen. When his name came up it just reminds me of that International Times advertisement looking by a Black Magic director whatever, who lived around that same area as Crippen did. VERY interesting film. When I saw the LILY and the subject matter I thought .... HMMMMMMM. Interesting. I have neither seen the film nor did I know about the John Mills thing. I will do some reasearch. i did know about Crispian Mills though, as he was in a modestly popular band back in the 90's called Kula Shaker who had a lot of eastern references in their songs and lyrics. Interestingly Crispian's father is Roy Boulting who, with his twin brother, directed The Family Way. Small World!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 3:46:43 GMT -5
All the while during this crazy November you have this: Nov 13, 1966 Sunday The front page of the `Sunday Telegraph' reports that two of the Beatles have approached Allen Klein through a third party. Klein, in London, did not announce the story himself or made himself available for comment. Brian dismisses the story as ridiculous. George and Ringo are said to be disturbed by the report; John, annoyed about the suggestion of their being disenchanted with Brian. Paul is abroad and cannot be reached for comment. When were any of these three around throughout September/October/early November 1966 for this to have occurred? Sep 14, 1966 Wednesday George and Pattie fly to India, on vacation. They're back by the 22nd October Sep 18, 1966 Sunday John (and Cynthia) go to Spain to begin filming How I Won the War. They're back by the 6th November. By the 9th October he was joined by Ringo Starr. The only person in London to be contacting Allen Klein or any third party is Paul McCartney. Unless George and John are telephoning eachother from Spain and India saying, hey, lets get Allen Klein when we get back home. Let's ask Ringo if he shows up either here or there. We can call the Klein article spin for spin's sake. He announced in June 1966 he would have them by the end of the year. End of the year starts showing up, you have two Beatles approaching him. Two Beatles have been out of country since September. By the time the article prints, 3 Beatles are back in England and one's gone. Who are these two Beatles then. And when did they do it. Let's see what the Daily Mirror had to say on the 14th November 1966, and the mysterious Third Man! View AttachmentI would imagine this is Klein being mischevious, though if there is a third man, my money would be on Neil Aspinall.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 25, 2013 3:41:16 GMT -5
This whole paragraph bothers the hell out of me. Especially with the DECEMBER 4th cut-off date for this entire soundtrack to be assembled. McCartney gave him 15 seconds of material before both left on holiday. Martin goes off and does who knows what with that 15 seconds. They reconvene after holidays and McCartney still has nothing. So Martin makes him write something, and gets John to kick him if he doesn't come up with it quick (just joking). Then it's off to CTS studios for three days and nights ....................................... WHEN??? When they were doing the Christmas Album? It has to be done before the 4th .... I swear. This is the stuff of fantasy. It is always nice to stir a little hornet's nest; and this has certainly done that! This the NME article I referred to yesterday. I hadn't really ever given this much thought, but, my gut tells me that George Martin did all the work and they simply used McCartney's name to sell it. You are right though, as usual, things don't quite add up!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 24, 2013 12:08:10 GMT -5
Not only that but he found the time to compose two themes for the film 'the family way'. I will post a newspaper article from the time when I find it, however, the essence was that George Martin suddenly realised he needed a love theme and landed up going to Pauls house and sitting there until he had composed it. The guy was certainly busy!
Interestingly though this work had to be rushed through because Decca, who had bought the film music rights, were going to release an orchestral version of McCartneys work under the name the tudor minstrels.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 24, 2013 9:52:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 24, 2013 9:01:41 GMT -5
Here's Paul and Maggie at a party at Indica; summer 66 I would guess? Here's Ringo with John on October 21, 1966 in Almeira, sans tache as previously stated. Interestingly it was this photo that was used in the crossroads newspaper article so it is likely that the 4 images were very recent.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 24, 2013 6:42:15 GMT -5
Right now I'm going through all images 1967. You know another thing that bothers me? Guess. The moustaches! When did everyone grow theirs and how long did it take. We see in December 1966, all four Beatles had a moustache. On November 11th, 1966 the Daily Mirror reports The Beatles at a crossroads. Harrison is the only one sporting a moustache. In-between this time, Harrison shaved his off, and the one Ringo was growing on holiday was shaved off as well -- so by November the only Beatle with a moustache was ... Paul. There is a picture of George & Ringo entering EMI without moustaches, so in-between India and the December 1966 interview outside of EMI, George re-grew his moustache. As did Ringo. Paul disappears sometime after the MM awards ceremonies, around 19th September 1966, correct? The next time you hear about him seems to be leaving England on the 6th November for France. The next footage of him surfaces with moustache somewhere in-between the 13th - 18th November, 1966. So really what you'd want to find is: Images of him between September 1966 thru to November 1966 while he's growing that moustache. And you know what? I've never seen anything like that in all the photos I've ever seen of things called Beatles. No mid-stage, almost grown McCartney moustache leading up to Pepper. The Beatlemania haircut, into the Pepper haircut --- nope, not that either. No transitional stage documented. There's this nearly two month gap where this guy just drops off the face of the earth. Which is why everyone comes here saying Paul Is Dead! I get that. But how can the most photographed band of its time, just have a member vanish and not be in the public eye? Surely there must be some coverage of him or some archive of his whereabouts? No pictures of him at all? Nothing? The whole moustache thing, especially with drawing them in on George & Paul in The Beatles Book Monthly, does this not seem odd to you how much this hair growth was being pushed through the media. I understand that's how pop news works, oh look they have earwax now! Wow! I get it. And it must have been quite a shock for Beatlemaniacs, so i can see why it was so newsworthy in that kind of treadmill of BeatleNews things. It's just something that occurred to me really. How long does it take to grow a moustache, well til it's not stubble, and actually resembles something. I'd say a good 3 to 4 weeks. Everyone's different though. I have to find that picture showing George & Ringo in late 1966 both without moustaches. Yeah, those damn moustaches! I cannot find any growth stage photos either; however, this is interesting. Good old Beatles Monthly again! November 66 edition I think. The segment that has been boxed off talks about John and Neil meeting Paul in Paris in September 66. He was accompanied apparently by Maggie McGivern with whom he was having an affair and about which she says.... In order for the young couple to stay together and let their relationship evolve it was essential that it remained a secret, and even a short break with friends took a great deal of forward thinking. In the first year of their relationship the couple took a trip to Paris with John Lennon and Brian Epstein, all four of them flying seperately, their seperately timed arrivals at least allowing them to stay in the same hotel together where Paul and Maggie shared a very luxurious suite.
"It was a marvellous holiday... just walking around the streets of paris. My abiding memory is of me, John and Paul lying under the Eiffel Tower, gazing up at it. We couldn't go up because we would have been recognised, and we were masters of the art of avoiding people... We spent more time with John than we did with George and Ringo - we hardly saw them at all." More details can be found here. I believe the Melody Maker awards were the 13th September. This affair does present some intriguing possibilities as to why McCartney may have gone off radar and possibly why he really grew the moustache. Interestingly she was employed by John Dunbar to look after his and Marianne Faithfull's baby, how incredibly convenient! Dunbar can now take responsibility for this relationship and John and Yoko's before gifting his partner to Mick Jagger. However, given that Paul is in a relationship with two women at that time it seems even less likely that he could have died, surely one of them would have noticed? Also of interest is the last segment that talks of how they expected filming to end by November 7, and possibly a week before that. Yet again raising the question of why Paul thought he would be meeting John in Spain in November - he knew for sure that John wouldn't be there!
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 24, 2013 3:22:24 GMT -5
Paul is interviewed in this months copy of Mojo magazine in which he claims he is 5'10" with hazel eyes and that he is/was as tall as John.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 23, 2013 8:36:33 GMT -5
Paul Is Dead? Media Myths and Legends: New Video Blog article here: link
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 5, 2013 15:56:49 GMT -5
My sincerest apologies for taking so long to get back here. A little more on why later. There's a lot of dis-info agents around these parts. But TKIN ( 60if.proboards.com) & Doppelganger & Identity Research Society [ doppels.proboards.com] has limited registration, wherein the mods & admins have to approve of your membership before you can start posting there (they're members-only message boards/forums). But here anyone can sign up, which makes it a breeding ground where dis-info agents [and those in denial about JPM being officially deceased since the latter part of '66] abound, unfortunately. I, too agree that Faul (I think there could be two) is very likely older than JPM the man looks as though he's in his late 70's/early 80's. After all, clones don't age as well [e.g., Fohn Fennon(s) especially the one shortly before he died; he appeared to be 60 or 70 years old, yuck]. But more on that later. If these two fellas here are the same guy [which I don't believe they are], then Faul very had only had a face-lift; after all, plastic/cosmetic surgery is more common than ever nowadays (not that I sanction it or anything) and he has money at his disposal to do things like that. It also depends upon when these separate photos were taken. (see doppels.proboards.com/thread/322/twin-fauls) But then again, the ears are different -- which is a/the red herring -- and one is more aged, rugged & haggard-looking than the other. Since I'm rather hungry -- not to mention it's pretty late -- I'll comment on Linda(s), JPM vs. Faul McFalsie(s) and John Lennon vs. Fohn Fennon(s) later on, along with images & links containing conspicuous evidence, as well as backing up & supporting my claims, along with your above comment. Peace. By "dis-info agents" I assume you mean anyone that doesn't buy into exactly the same theories as you? I await your theories with baited breath, but, please realise that the reason that nobody posts on TKIN anymore is because Sun King and his brain dead 60if document have been totally discredited. The reason I post in this forum is because there are still a few users who wish to debate and discuss the PID myth and what it really may mean. As I have said elsewhere, all we know for certain is that the Beatles, and their chief propagandist Neil Aspinall, wanted us to believe a false history. Everything else is still a matter of debate.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 5, 2013 15:46:49 GMT -5
Pardon the intrusion... It is good to see so many of you taking an active role in trying to solve this mystery. I say, keep up the good work and go where the clues lead you. For those who belly ache about not getting answers when they demand them, I find you rather sad and pathetic. Who was it that brought you in to the fray? I rather doubt you were forced by gun point. Doubt you were drug by your feet kicking and screaming. YOU chose to "play the game". Well, shut the fuck up and PLAY THE GAME! Nobody here is going to hand over the golden ring. Do the work and reap the awards. Or else find another cause you have the mental capacity to participate in. If one so exist. There have been many who doubt what I had brought to the table, either from myself or those I worked with. If you have a problem with that, move along. I don't need to prove anything to you, nor did Nell. For those who lack the understanding of any relationship, Nell was a nickname used by many, Fabs included. A far stretch from Nell Carter, whoever posted such an asinine response. It's people like YOU that stain the reputation of those who may be willing lend a hand. A very good reason why some of those people are not active today. And finally, an open apology to Lucy. You are aware of what I speak., That being said, finding delight in the misfortune of others seems so unlike you. For one that embraces the "Imagine" concept, you might as well have shat on the ground it stands. You should know better. Your mother should know. Dust off your disguise and rejoin the party. You are missed. THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN SEE THAT ISN'T SHOWN APOV APOV THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN SEE THAT ISN'T SHOWNIt is good to see you back, but how comes you are an invisible user?
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 5, 2013 15:43:40 GMT -5
So, okay. Let us consider a few implications of pre-1966 PID clues. Dead or alive, JPM was replaced or doppelganged prior to 1966, for ... esoteric, artistic, commercial or occult purposes. This being orchestrated by the Beatles themselves, or their 'handlers' i.e. any concerned parties or 'entities', with the proximity and/or ability to exert influence over the Fab 3-4. Which wasn't always difficult. The Beatles were both incredibly astute and niaive on occassion, and once gave a man in their entourage named 'Magic Alex', a Greek TV repairman, £1,000,0000 to build a working UFO. However, Alex's swift disappearance, and theft, would prove to be his ultimate legacy. But that said, 1966-7 was an apparent watershed. The Beatles stopped touring. Aspinall died. Paul switched his hair-parting - reminiscent of the Clark Kent - Superman alterego, and psychdelia was born - and did the Ashers and Yoko enter the scene, at this date? Aspinall died in 1966? Do you know something we don't? The Ashers were on the scene since 1963. The only thing I am sure of is that the Beatles wanted us to believe and accept a false history and from 1969 wanted us to believe the PID myth. Everything else is speculation.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 5, 2013 7:33:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 3, 2013 3:36:08 GMT -5
New McCartney book claims that Linda saved him from a mental breakdown during the Beatles split. Paul suffered a massive identity crisis as the band were splitting, a new biography claims Paul has revealed that his wife Linda "saved" him from a nervous breakdown during the demise of The Beatles in 1969.
The revelation comes in a forthcoming biography titled Man On The Run: Paul McCartney In The 1970s, which is to be published on Friday (September 6). In the book, author Tom Doyle writes that McCartney suffered a massive crisis of confidence as the band were splitting up and fled to his farm in Scotland.
An excerpt from the book, as published by The Sunday Times, reads: "Day by day, his (McCartney's) condition had been steadily worsening. His often sleepless nights were spent shaking with anxiety, while his days were characterised by heavy drinking and self-sedation with marijuana. For the first time in his life, he felt utterly worthless. This was an identity crisis in extremis ... when he did get out of bed, he would reach straight for the whisky and by three in the afternoon was usually out of it."
Doyle interviewed McCartney for the biography and the singer said of his recovery: "It was Linda who saved me and it was all done in a sort of domestic setting." McCartney, by now on the mend, would announce his departure from The Beatles in April 1970.Interesting cover photo!!
|
|