|
Post by iwilliam on Nov 10, 2012 16:43:39 GMT -5
Well, his ability to legally share it would depend on what the source was (documents, video, audio, etc). It is, of course, more complicated in the case of video or audio. I know it goes against his format, but he could choose to reveal what he knows, assuming there is anything (funny, I never used to feel the need to punctuate my IAAP comments with this), in another form.
And lets assume this is true -- why would he wait until the last minute to mention these threats? He had to have known people were anxiously awaiting this, and that to pull a stunt like this might really mess with his credibility. IMO I would be far less inclined to feel this way if he had mentioned WEEKS, or even DAYS ago that he had been threatened and there would be a delay in the revelation.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Nov 10, 2012 16:25:19 GMT -5
I'm sorry.... I really like this guy's work, but this "revelation" is absolute bullshit.
I can understand, that if he is telling the truth about being threatened with lawsuits and cease-and-desist letters, he is probably a bit intimidated. However, acting in the capacity of a JOURNALIST, he does have a certain amount of protection against this. Especially if:
1- He actually has some kind of real solid evidence. Reporting on evidence found in a truthful manner is legal.
2- He is careful to use a disclaimer saying the opinions and views are his own, and are his own personal CONCLUSIONS.
Anything else is BS-- either him being scared, being a liar, or being dramatic.
He also could have said something about all these legal threats sooner than 18 hours ago.
The case for IAAP being a real source of information is starting to look bad.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 19, 2012 23:09:53 GMT -5
Edit: I was mistaken about something I previously thought I heard. Something weird with my speakers. lol. However....
...What about "Lucy and this guy with diamond?" At various points in the song it sounds like this. The first time, for example, you clearly hear the "s" at the end of the word... but not every time.
What about the cover of Sgt. Pepper? The mirror image where the diamond points to Paul? Who might "Lucy" be?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 19, 2012 13:01:08 GMT -5
Credit for this one goes to my brilliant girlfriend.
We were discussing the code in the drum. It actually came up due to a funny moment of synchronicity as I read Dan Brown's Lost Symbol. The protagonist Robert Langdon is examining a piece of evidence, and he says "The Roman numeral I-I-I-X doesn't exist. It would be written V-I-I."
With a laugh I pointed this out to her, and that's when it occurred to her--
Maybe the "x" here is to indicate multiplication, or "times."
I I I (times) ^ HE DIE
Three Times He Die?
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 16, 2012 16:52:30 GMT -5
I love it when a plan comes together Just like I love it when links are DEAD. Did you know that 95% of non-IAAP PID links are DEAD? True story. Of course, I'm sure some of it has to do with the endless sea of links that people like to post. Of course, it would be far, FAR too much work for most of these poor souls to "copy and paste" the content from said links into their posts, for the INEVITABLE day that the links go dead... so that future seekers may read and learn (No offense intended to OP -- that obviously isn't too easy to do when it comes to a video. It is possible... just a pain in the rear, and so perfectly understandable people aren't making back-up copies of all vids to their own youtube channel) ....but really.... when it comes to a short piece of text... it really steams my britches when people give a link, and only a link... and I click to find the content gone. In the cases of rare content... or content that *someone* really wants gone, it is especially bad. So remember, folks... always have a little pasta with your links!* *this public service announcement has been brought to you by dead links and frustration.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 13, 2012 13:49:47 GMT -5
hm. I'll consider that....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 13, 2012 13:46:25 GMT -5
yes How so? (preferably in words )
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 13, 2012 1:03:07 GMT -5
It's also interesting that Keith Moon and Mama Cass both died in Harry Nilsson's apartment. (Not to get too off topic). Also, John Todd got the date and album title of C,S,N & Young's album wrong, for what it's worth. it was titled Four Way Street, not Two Way Street. And how did it have an affect on the '60s when it was released in 1971? (Some friend of David Crosby's ) Can you point me to the exact... or even approximate point in the video where he talks about this?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 23:46:28 GMT -5
Oh, sorry... you are correct, aren't you?
The singular eye....
Hadn't thought of that, in context....hm...
Won't even throw me a bone for the B & J thing?
lol
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 23:44:54 GMT -5
Venus was very bright last night. That's what made me notice sirius.
Jess... I like your idea for a poll. But what would you suggest as options?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 21:53:45 GMT -5
So... I may have missed someone else commenting on this... but am I the only one who wants to rewind to the " I think we’re being kept in a world run by an evil magician who is casting spells on us," comment from the OP?
Kind of jumped out at me, for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 21:34:27 GMT -5
Simple Song does remind me of a Beatle track. Particularly in the opening.
Thanks for the doc -- I'll have to check it out.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 20:45:01 GMT -5
1- Beacon -- I don't' think it's the girl with kaleidescope eyes, but the girl with the SON IN HER EYES that you're looking for. 2- candle matches Or pillars, maybe? Boaz and Jachin? Am I warm? lol
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 19:25:52 GMT -5
If I am suppose to be seeing the connection there, I'm sorry, but I am missing it.
To be fair, when I was IQ tested, despite doing very well in other areas, I was proven to NOT be terribly visual-spatially oriented. :lol:
Regarding PID as a metaphor: I have not yet decided how I feel about that either way. But to that I would ask -- what would you make of the evidence out there of an ACTUAL physical replacement? Much of which seems like straw-grasping... but some of which seems very strong... particularly that analysis from Wired?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 19:07:20 GMT -5
Thank you for the response, dogstar. I think a brief explanation of why he is supposed to represent sirius would make that video rather understandable to someone with a little less background.
I also find this amusingly synchronistic, as last night I was out looking at the stars with my girlfriend (who is much better with astronomy than I) and i pointed to a particular star, which looked like it was lightly blinking, asking her if she knew what it was...
...to which she replied "Sirius."
No joke. Then again, synchronicity seems to follow me EVERYWHERE.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 17:07:30 GMT -5
Thanks linus! I think that these scribblings by John if they are just "off the top of his head" as it were they are even MORE worthy of examination. If planned out (which would mean nearly everything he did even in passing was "carefully thought out" ) then it is significant. If it is a quick sketch, then it is dadaist, subconscious, a manifestation of his thoughts in doodle terms.. therefor significant. I see in the scribbles many things. Obvious is the PA UL, but also there seems to be a lightning bolt that strikes from a man with a scowl on the top left to the between the horns area of a devil or otherwise horned being (like lightning from heaven). At the bottom left looks like a palm tree perhaps. John of course has drawn in GLASSES on both his nose but also ABOVE his eyes in the third eye or "higher way of seeing" region, the flower in the mouth is obvious - reaching in towards the area to the left. What this means "the flower in the mouth" i haven't gotten to yet. At his solar plexus is a WINDOW i think. (reminds me a bit of the teletubbies lol) and below that, frankly i see a JANUS two or three headed face. On the right hand top i may be seeing an "F" there... and i see TWO SUNS... below that a moon, FISH and water... (or water fish moon depending on how you read it...) below that is a face/head non-descript, yet the hair seems to be standing up towards John, or maybe flowing like as if underwater.. low gravity. There is something below that on the hand but i can't make it out. Below that is some kind of horned beingor demon?? IDK. Anyway, some observations. This is a weird doodle and I would love to hear the back-story on it. I agree with many of your interpretations. I can't tell if the upper right is a PA as you suggest or an AA. A.A. was an occult order related to crowley and the OTO. Along with your interpretation, take note that the "F" occurs across from the supposed "PA" I didn't see where the "UL" you see are. The face in the upper right with the scowl has a cartoonishly long nose. This has lines through it, possibly suggesting "cut off" Is that a moon and a fish? Fish and loaves? These in all probability could just be random scribbles not intended to be significant. However, Ive recently come to the theory that humans contstantly reveal their true thoughts and feelings via sub-text... which can take on a number of forms. Think of it as a kind of "freudian slip." Jung had a similar idea to mine.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 16:21:41 GMT -5
I was reading a post in another forum, the content of which seemed kind of convoluted or mixed up. Something about something-or-other detracting from the political message of "revolution 9." Someone pointed out that the song has nothing to do with politics (I have no idea what the original author was thinking, there, TBH) But it got me thinking....
....due to...well, I suppose lots of reasons... I'm sure when many hear the title "revolution 9" they think of a revolution. Y'know... like the ones in 1776. A political revolution. But this, of course, is not the only meaning of the word. In fact, I suspect the political meaning was derived from the original meaning (though I don't know this for a fact) -- in that the notion of power changing hands could be seen as a TURNING AROUND.
Revolution, of course, means to spin, right?
Revolution what?
Revolution 9.
What happens when you revolve a 9?
It becomes a 6.
It still has meaning.
The Beatles have told us, via this song title, that this "song" will still have meaning if revolved THE OTHER WAY.
I was quite amused when this occurred to me.
Discuss.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 15:21:08 GMT -5
1- Very interesting video, but I missed how the dog star actually tied in, in the beginning. It was mentioned in relation to the album cover, and the dog star = god star, but I didn't see how we arrived at "dog star" in the first place, in order to be able to jump to "god star" 2- Echoing some comments on the page for the new vid -- Should I assume that the suggestion here is the PID thing is symbolic only? 3- Awesome.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 2:47:45 GMT -5
... is pretty damn close to...
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 12, 2012 2:41:49 GMT -5
Yeah, that's the guy I was talking about. That is from a much longer talk.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 11, 2012 23:58:42 GMT -5
*refreshes the youtube page repeatedly* Okay, it's been the 12th for almost an hour now, here. Where's the video? lol... I guess I'll try to be patient.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 11, 2012 19:14:28 GMT -5
Thanks for the reply. I got it sorted. For some reason it will NOT let me upload an image from the particular file hosting site I was using. I noticed it when I went to post the full sized picture above from the same file host site. Used another host, and everything's golden.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 11, 2012 19:07:04 GMT -5
Maybe I'm doing something really dumb here, but I can't seem to get an avatar to show up. I re-sized my pic so that it was 100 x 76 pixels (max is supposed to be 100x100, correct?) and it still will not show up. What might I be doing wrong? lol
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 11, 2012 19:02:10 GMT -5
I do have to say I find it interesting that they called it a "sonic temple" and also depicted it with a checkerboard floor pattern.
I am sure some of you are familiar with the work of John Todd who alleged that he was a former illuminati "insider" and that these studios would have a "temple room" where the masters were satanically blessed. Well... possessed might be a more accurate term, given his description.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Oct 11, 2012 18:47:40 GMT -5
1- The thing about the attitude wasn't just directed at you. I also intended that as a general kind of statement, as I have seen certain members make posts like that OFTEN in some of these forums... you know... the I-know-something-you-all-don't and i-won't-share-it-directly-but-I-will-drop-clues-and-keep-you-all-guessing kind of vibe. IMO there is A LOT of stuff out there on these subjects--lots of speculation--and very few seem to have real answers. So when someone makes a post like that, I often react (internally, at least) the same as if someone came in saying they have some major beatles secrets, which they will gladly reveal... in their new ebook for only $9.99. :lol: 2- I had a look at the thread you reference, but I will go re-read it and look for the post you describe 3- I am new to this forum, and because the layout of this forum is different than almost ALL of the ones I am used to, I did not realize there were so many pages in this thread. (I am used to seeing page controls on the right, not left, usually as "go to page 1,2,3.....37,last, often as an underlined hotlink. IMO it seems half-hidden, here, by comparison.) 4- Speaking of half hidden... I forget, but has someone posted this yet?Not quite a match for your image, but it does contain some of the elements. I AM = I.M. ?
Anyone ever wonder if the "M.I." in "EMI" might actually stand for "Military Intelligence?"[/u] I also noticed the I ("eye") is at the top of the pyramid. 8-O
|
|