|
Post by il ras on Jul 23, 2009 20:27:47 GMT -5
I agree with Dh. Can you please start a dedicated 3d?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 23, 2009 20:40:13 GMT -5
Can you please start a dedicated 3d? Worthy of one..
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jul 23, 2009 20:50:22 GMT -5
If you want to know what "Paul is Dead" really means, (and it really does means something), and if you want to know what HE^DIE means, (and The Beatles really did put it on Pepper on purpose), then you need to: 1) Memorize the lyrics to Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. 2) Read Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll. 3) Read The Goldbug by Poe. 4) Get rid of the supernatural and conspiracy ideas and think simple wordplay. 5) Repeat until the light comes on. If you are not willing to take these steps then there is nothing that I can do to help you understand. Paul is not really a dead man. He just plays one on Pepper. -j I'm inclined to agree a bit with this sentiment. The Beatles, certainly, became more abstract & figurative in their later years. "Love songs" (in general) to Strawberry Fields or Lucy Sky Diamonds or Fool on the Hill... I doubt that their 'art', in a broad sense, was just a willy-nilly frivolous romp without a layered significance. They wanted to change their image, and I suppose they wanted to indulge in something they enjoyed. I still see some differences between JPMs in certain images, or instances, so I also think that PWR in some fashion or another, for some duration or another.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jul 23, 2009 21:30:54 GMT -5
I think the first step is proving that there is a man playing the role of Paul McCartney who is not the real Paul McCartney. Once that can be proved, then the questions will come up as to what happened to the original Paul. Very true, first things first. But, if this thing does gain momentum, things are going to hit the fan. That's a big IF.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jul 23, 2009 21:33:22 GMT -5
It would be fun to see Sir Paul sueing Wired Italia... BTW taking someone else's identity is illegal for sure I don't think Sir P would touch it. It would bring way too much publicity if it was a court thing. He's too smart for that. (isn't he?)
|
|
|
Post by FP on Jul 24, 2009 0:25:54 GMT -5
So do you guys believe that the "powers that be" simply don't care anymore? Or do they not have control of Italy?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 24, 2009 0:32:29 GMT -5
My opinion on Italy is that the truth slips out from time to time. But the story won't reach America, except indirectly.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jul 24, 2009 0:46:50 GMT -5
Edgar Allen and James Paul were both assassinated by freemasons... man you should have seen them kicking...
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 24, 2009 8:37:21 GMT -5
Sir Paul has nothing to worry about... especially not the US & British mainstream media. Just look what happened to all the scientific evidence from architects & engineers from around the world that shows conclusively that the WTC buildings did not & could not have been brought down by jet fuel. And all the media slips on the morning of 911 that reported explosions. All this stuff has been buried alive & the media will not even get close to touching it with a 10 foot pole. If something this big can be successfully silenced, then something like 2 Pauls is a piece of cake. I guaranty Sir Paul won't loose a minutes sleep over this.
Plus....there are large numbers of people who refuse to believe this no matter how much evidence is slapping them in the face. The amount of evidence is inconsequential, this will go nowhere.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jul 24, 2009 9:03:28 GMT -5
mmhh.. but if any media or media-system in europe is under governantial control, it's the italian one. and i do not mean any conspiracy or something. berlusconi owns and controls like 90 % of the italian media for a fact. in europe there is very much political talk and controvery about that. so if the media control (by the illuminati or other PID conspiracy group) would be real, it would certainly be in Italy where the freedom of media is by far not as possible as in th US for example..
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jul 24, 2009 9:47:04 GMT -5
Sir Paul has nothing to worry about... especially not the US & British mainstream media. Just look what happened to all the scientific evidence from architects & engineers from around the world that shows conclusively that the WTC buildings did not & could not have been brought down by jet fuel. And all the media slips on the morning of 911 that reported explosions. All this stuff has been buried alive & the media will not even get close to touching it with a 10 foot pole. If something this big can be successfully silenced, then something like 2 Pauls is a piece of cake. I guaranty Sir Paul won't loose a minutes sleep over this. Plus....there are large numbers of people who refuse to believe this no matter how much evidence is slapping them in the face. The amount of evidence is inconsequential, this will go nowhere. Agreed, EB. The vast majority are too hypnotized by the trance-inducing flicker rate of the box in the corner of their living room to give serious consideration to what's going on around them. Ice cream? CHECK Beer? CHECK What else is there?
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 24, 2009 10:03:51 GMT -5
Yeah, and he would probably laugh his ass off if he read it
|
|
|
Post by 8749 on Jul 24, 2009 17:11:47 GMT -5
mmhh.. but if any media or media-system in europe is under governantial control, it's the italian one. and i do not mean any conspiracy or something. berlusconi owns and controls like 90 % of the italian media for a fact. in europe there is very much political talk and controvery about that. so if the media control (by the illuminati or other PID conspiracy group) would be real, it would certainly be in Italy where the freedom of media is by far not as possible as in th US for example.. Maybe Berlusconi is an old Beatles fan. I'm not joking.
|
|
|
Post by 8749 on Jul 24, 2009 17:19:31 GMT -5
And jarvatronics, if you are going to berate board members for not interpreting things clearly, please be clear yourself. And as for getting the word out on this article, I will dedicate myself to doing that next week, if I can clear it with the powers that be on this board (and you know who you are) that I can point people to this board as the source of discussion about the article.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Jul 24, 2009 19:44:06 GMT -5
I don't think Sir P would touch it. It would bring way too much publicity if it was a court thing. He's too smart for that. (isn't he?) I think if he were the original Paul, he would sue them for sure. But since he's not, the smart thing is to ignore it or laugh it off.
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 25, 2009 3:50:32 GMT -5
I don't think Sir P would touch it. It would bring way too much publicity if it was a court thing. He's too smart for that. (isn't he?) I think if he were the original Paul, he would sue them for sure. But since he's not, the smart thing is to ignore it or laugh it off. So IF he sues them, is that proof that Paul wasn't replaced?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Jul 26, 2009 0:49:55 GMT -5
I think if he were the original Paul, he would sue them for sure. But since he's not, the smart thing is to ignore it or laugh it off. So IF he sues them, is that proof that Paul wasn't replaced? Certainly not. Oscar Wilde sued for libel after someone called him a sodomite. Jeffrey MacDonald sued Joe McGinniss after McGinniss wrote that MacDonald had murdered his family. Secret Service agent George Warren Hickey sued after someone wrote a book alleging that he had accidentally blown JFK's head off. But what the Marquess of Queensberry said about Wilde was not untrue -- and in all probability, Jeffrey MacDonald did murder his family. And I think that Hickey did accidentally kill JFK. It's not uncommon for people to take umbrage when others tell the truth about them. Anyway, SPM has already said that he is a double or a replica of the original. In "Rinse the Raindrops, the background vocalists seem to be declaring, "By the way, Paul is dead". Depending on what your pleasure is, he is either joking or he is telling the truth and passing it off as a joke. But whatever the truth is, it would make no sense for SPM to sue. It would be a little hard for him to show that he has been damaged by a statement about himself that he himself has repeated and that the Beatles themselves as a group -- for whatever reason -- hinted at.
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on Jul 26, 2009 5:44:30 GMT -5
OR they're not saying "By the way, Paul is dead" It's only you who WANTS to hear stuff like that in the songs
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Jul 26, 2009 15:07:44 GMT -5
OR they're not saying "By the way, Paul is dead" It's only you who WANTS to hear stuff like that in the songs I don't WANT to see or hear anything, other than how it really is. I have always approached this topic with an open mind; at least, I like to think so. For example, I think that it's fairly clear that at the end of Strawberry Fields, John is saying, "Cranberry sauce" and not "I buried Paul". There are other clues that I think of as totally spurious. And there are others that are real. In "Rinse the Raindrops", it sounds like the background vocalists are saying, "By the way, Paul is dead", but it's too indistinct to be absolutely certain. What ARE they saying? In any event, there are enough genuine indicia to suggest that, for whatever reason, the Beatles really have been playing this game for years.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 26, 2009 18:06:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jul 26, 2009 20:42:59 GMT -5
So which way is Faul really playing...left or right? White dove at 6:16.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jul 27, 2009 1:58:11 GMT -5
I hear: "All the way, aaalll the way" Anyway. its a great song, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by 8749 on Jul 27, 2009 17:43:30 GMT -5
Sounds like "Hollywood Paul is Dead" to me.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Jul 28, 2009 15:05:42 GMT -5
Sounds like "Hollywood Paul is Dead" to me. I'm confident that the first three syllables are "By the way". The last three syllables could be "Paul is dead", but it's possible that that's simply the power of suggestion working on me.
|
|
|
Post by 8749 on Jul 28, 2009 16:09:47 GMT -5
|
|