|
|
Post by paulmccartney on Mar 5, 2022 2:19:21 GMT -5
Hey, it would mean so much to me seeing as we are all invested in the truth about James Paul McCartney dying in 1966 that I can have a copy of The Memoirs Of Billy Shears.
It would mean so much to me, this generosity from you kind souls. I mean it.
When I found out McCartney died and was replaced by FAUL, I became chronically depressed and found out more celebs were replaced. I want to see if this book will tell me why,
tell me the truth, the horrible truth behind the replacement. Please, I'm in a extremely low paying job and I do not have a bank account so if anyone have the PDF or audiobook,
I will be eternally grateful.
|
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Mar 5, 2022 4:31:38 GMT -5
Hey, it would mean so much to me seeing as we are all invested in the truth about James Paul McCartney dying in 1966 that I can have a copy of The Memoirs Of Billy Shears. It would mean so much to me, this generosity from you kind souls. I mean it. When I found out McCartney died and was replaced by FAUL, I became chronically depressed and found out more celebs were replaced. I want to see if this book will tell me why, tell me the truth, the horrible truth behind the replacement. Please, I'm in a extremely low paying job and I do not have a bank account so if anyone have the PDF or audiobook, I will be eternally grateful. That's not what happened. "Paul McCartney" is a public character who has been performed by at least a half dozen different guys since 1957. |
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 5, 2022 14:23:20 GMT -5
Hey, it would mean so much to me seeing as we are all invested in the truth about James Paul McCartney dying in 1966 that I can have a copy of The Memoirs Of Billy Shears. It would mean so much to me, this generosity from you kind souls. I mean it. When I found out McCartney died and was replaced by FAUL, I became chronically depressed and found out more celebs were replaced. I want to see if this book will tell me why, tell me the truth, the horrible truth behind the replacement. Please, I'm in a extremely low paying job and I do not have a bank account so if anyone have the PDF or audiobook, I will be eternally grateful. That's not what happened. "Paul McCartney" is a public character who has been performed by at least a half dozen different guys since 1957. I think that "Faul" has been around SO LONG (FAR longer then "Paul") that it is more accurate that there are TWO Characters that have very little to do with each other! They don't look like each other they don't sound like each other etc.! Paul was more of a playboy! "Faul" was a family guy that had kids and wives! Sure there were doubles but the doubles of "Paul" looked like Paul and the doubles of "Faul" looked like Faul! If we say that they were interchangeable then we might as well forget the whole thing! |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Mar 5, 2022 17:26:42 GMT -5
That's not what happened. "Paul McCartney" is a public character who has been performed by at least a half dozen different guys since 1957. I think that "Faul" has been around SO LONG (FAR longer then "Paul") that it is more accurate that there are TWO Characters that have very little to do with each other! They don't look like each other they don't sound like each other etc.! Paul was more of a playboy! "Faul" was a family guy that had kids and wives! Sure there were doubles but the doubles of "Paul" looked like Paul and the doubles of "Faul" looked like Faul! If we say that they were interchangeable then we might as well forget the whole thing! Ok, but if you go back to the Hamburg days, other than heights, Billy, “Paul III” & “Paul II” all did somewhat resemble one another. The Paul shown in Liverpool before Hamburg with the low, short sharp brows resembled the Beatlemania era Pauls more than Hamburg or Wings Pauls or, for that matter, the 67-70 Pauls. One of my biggest questions is why that early Liverpool Paul was excluded from or quit during Beatlemania. There are a few shots of him in 63 looking really unhappy…and then he never seems to be a Public Paul again, but can be see in images at least into the 70s. |
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 5, 2022 20:33:56 GMT -5
I think that "Faul" has been around SO LONG (FAR longer then "Paul") that it is more accurate that there are TWO Characters that have very little to do with each other! They don't look like each other they don't sound like each other etc.! Paul was more of a playboy! "Faul" was a family guy that had kids and wives! Sure there were doubles but the doubles of "Paul" looked like Paul and the doubles of "Faul" looked like Faul! If we say that they were interchangeable then we might as well forget the whole thing! Ok, but if you go back to the Hamburg days, other than heights, Billy, “Paul III” & “Paul II” all did somewhat resemble one another. The Paul shown in Liverpool before Hamburg with the low, short sharp brows resembled the Beatlemania era Pauls more than Hamburg or Wings Pauls or, for that matter, the 67-70 Pauls. One of my biggest questions is why that early Liverpool Paul was excluded from or quit during Beatlemania. There are a few shots of him in 63 looking really unhappy…and then he never seems to be a Public Paul again, but can be see in images at least into the 70s. OK but how much of that is "magic" (manipulated and deceptive photos or videos) and how much is "real"? I think most of it is manipulation! The media want the whole thing to appear more complicated then it is IMO! It is a lot like COVID! The media builds everything into hysteria but if you look at what actually happen you will see NOTHING actually happened! Instead of saying "Nothing is Real" say "Nothing Happened", lol! |
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Mar 5, 2022 20:52:37 GMT -5
Ok, but if you go back to the Hamburg days, other than heights, Billy, “Paul III” & “Paul II” all did somewhat resemble one another. The Paul shown in Liverpool before Hamburg with the low, short sharp brows resembled the Beatlemania era Pauls more than Hamburg or Wings Pauls or, for that matter, the 67-70 Pauls. One of my biggest questions is why that early Liverpool Paul was excluded from or quit during Beatlemania. There are a few shots of him in 63 looking really unhappy…and then he never seems to be a Public Paul again, but can be see in images at least into the 70s. OK but how much of that is "magic" (manipulated and deceptive photos or videos) and how much is "real"? I think most of it is manipulation! The media want the whole thing to appear more complicated then it is IMO! It is a lot like COVID! The media builds everything into hysteria but if you look at what actually happen you will see NOTHING actually happened! Instead of saying "Nothing is Real" say "Nothing Happened", lol! Here's the thing (as I see it). If the early photos made prior to the Beatles becoming a worldwide success were manipulated, why do the early Pauls have chin shapes and jaw lines that look nothing like the Bealtemania Pauls? If photo manipulation was going on, one would think that the early photos available to us on the Internet would have been manipulated to make ALL pre-1967 Pauls appear consistent. But they don't. Among the very early Pauls, you see such features as short, square chins and weak jaw lines. These features are, for the most part, inconsistent with the Beatlemania Paul look. For instance, look at the Paul in the 1966 Memphis interview. He has a long oval chin. Early Pauls have short square chins. Also, at least to me, some of the early Pauls look notably older, and some are notably taller, than the typical bio-markers we see among Beatlemania Pauls. |
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 5, 2022 21:21:48 GMT -5
Hey, it would mean so much to me seeing as we are all invested in the truth about James Paul McCartney dying in 1966 that I can have a copy of The Memoirs Of Billy Shears. It would mean so much to me, this generosity from you kind souls. I mean it. When I found out McCartney died and was replaced by FAUL, I became chronically depressed and found out more celebs were replaced. I want to see if this book will tell me why, tell me the truth, the horrible truth behind the replacement. Please, I'm in a extremely low paying job and I do not have a bank account so if anyone have the PDF or audiobook, I will be eternally grateful. The Memoirs book says that Paul died in a car crash. That said, the book claims that some of what's in it is fiction. The reason for that is that it had to be published as a work of fiction to keep the publisher and others involved from lawsuits that would result if it were presented as fact. Therefore, it clearly states, certain parts of the book are deliberately fiction, and are labelled as such. I don't believe, however, that the car-crash account in the book is intended to be fictional. If you can scrape together $23, you should be able to get a copy. Click on where it says "read more" in the link below for more information about the book. www.amazon.com/Memoirs-Billy-Shears-Thomas-Uharriet/dp/0984292586/ref=monarch_sidesheetIf anyone wants to help paulmccartney out, please message him to work out the details. PAUL McCARTNEY We Can Work It Out Unplugged Deluxe Yellow Cowyoutu.be/kYqIoHf-wgU ------ (real JPM)nelson dvoskin Jan 29, 2015 |
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 5, 2022 22:24:16 GMT -5
OK but how much of that is "magic" (manipulated and deceptive photos or videos) and how much is "real"? I think most of it is manipulation! The media want the whole thing to appear more complicated then it is IMO! It is a lot like COVID! The media builds everything into hysteria but if you look at what actually happen you will see NOTHING actually happened! Instead of saying "Nothing is Real" say "Nothing Happened", lol! Here's the thing (as I see it). If the early photos made prior to the Beatles becoming a worldwide success were manipulated, why do the early Pauls have chin shapes and jaw lines that look nothing like the Bealtemania Pauls? If photo manipulation was going on, one would think that the early photos available to us on the Internet would have been manipulated to make ALL pre-1967 Pauls appear consistent. But they don't. Among the very early Pauls, you see such features as short, square chins and weak jaw lines. These features are, for the most part, inconsistent with the Beatlemania Paul look. For instance, look at the Paul in the 1966 Memphis interview. He has a long oval chin. Early Pauls have short square chins. Also, at least to me, some of the early Pauls look notably older, and some are notably taller, than the typical bio-markers we see among Beatlemania Pauls. Watch this video of Shin Lim! If you can explain how he does these AMAZING TRICKS (Penn and Teller can't) then you can maybe understand how they pull off all these "Pauls" and "Fauls"! Its MAGIC! www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAN-PwRfJcA |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Mar 6, 2022 1:37:57 GMT -5
Ok, but if you go back to the Hamburg days, other than heights, Billy, “Paul III” & “Paul II” all did somewhat resemble one another. The Paul shown in Liverpool before Hamburg with the low, short sharp brows resembled the Beatlemania era Pauls more than Hamburg or Wings Pauls or, for that matter, the 67-70 Pauls. One of my biggest questions is why that early Liverpool Paul was excluded from or quit during Beatlemania. There are a few shots of him in 63 looking really unhappy…and then he never seems to be a Public Paul again, but can be see in images at least into the 70s. OK but how much of that is "magic" (manipulated and deceptive photos or videos) and how much is "real"? I think most of it is manipulation! The media want the whole thing to appear more complicated then it is IMO! It is a lot like COVID! The media builds everything into hysteria but if you look at what actually happen you will see NOTHING actually happened! Instead of saying "Nothing is Real" say "Nothing Happened", lol! The majority of the people I see leaning on these ideas of "photo manipulation" (1) refuse to admit there were more than 2 Paul; (2) refuse to look at images pre-65; (3) refuse to explain how printed materials, including printed film from the time, could have been created to resemble "Billy" (who they believe formed out of thin air in 66) a full decade earlier. As such, I reject that theory on the basis that the people who use it are simply grasping for confirmation bias and refuse to critically address the problems with their pet theory. I do agree some images were retroactively doctored and there's some weird shit going on in a lot of Dezo's contributions (but not face merging of Pauls) and Get Back very well could be 90% AI generated; however, I find the suggestion that that early copies of Beatles Monthly or whatever and press conferences were manipulated, years and years before Billy was brought back into the fold, laughable on their face. |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Mar 6, 2022 1:42:32 GMT -5
kvoAnd here is Liverpool Short Sharp Brows Paul -- who differs from the taller puffier one who eventually looked a bit like Elvis in the 70s and seems to have ceased being a public Paul circa 62/63
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 6, 2022 15:56:23 GMT -5
OK but how much of that is "magic" (manipulated and deceptive photos or videos) and how much is "real"? I think most of it is manipulation! The media want the whole thing to appear more complicated then it is IMO! It is a lot like COVID! The media builds everything into hysteria but if you look at what actually happen you will see NOTHING actually happened! Instead of saying "Nothing is Real" say "Nothing Happened", lol! The majority of the people I see leaning on these ideas of "photo manipulation" (1) refuse to admit there were more than 2 Paul; (2) refuse to look at images pre-65; (3) refuse to explain how printed materials, including printed film from the time, could have been created to resemble "Billy" (who they believe formed out of thin air in 66) a full decade earlier. As such, I reject that theory on the basis that the people who use it are simply grasping for confirmation bias and refuse to critically address the problems with their pet theory. I do agree some images were retroactively doctored and there's some weird shit going on in a lot of Dezo's contributions (but not face merging of Pauls) and Get Back very well could be 90% AI generated; however, I find the suggestion that that early copies of Beatles Monthly or whatever and press conferences were manipulated, years and years before Billy was brought back into the fold, laughable on their face. Magicians can do time travel! Watch Penn and Teller "fool us" videos and if they can fool Penn and Teller they can fool you and I! www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsqZP4blAGs |
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Mar 8, 2022 11:24:46 GMT -5
It's not the real JPM on the We Can Work It Out promo. Nor is it the real John Lennon.
|
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Apr 29, 2022 11:38:51 GMT -5
kvo And here is Liverpool Short Sharp Brows Paul -- who differs from the taller puffier one who eventually looked a bit like Elvis in the 70s and seems to have ceased being a public Paul circa 62/63 Life is very short. Too short to keep screwing up this song and starting again over and over. Linda's on stage. Who was she married to anyway? Any of these guys, or all of them? This Paul got a bit pudgy over the years. But who is this one, supposedly early Liverpool, at about 15:59? I haven't seen this Paul/George photo before. He reminds of the Paul backstage in Detroit in 1966. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WoIQG9qZ_s |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 29, 2022 21:40:57 GMT -5
kvo And here is Liverpool Short Sharp Brows Paul -- who differs from the taller puffier one who eventually looked a bit like Elvis in the 70s and seems to have ceased being a public Paul circa 62/63 Life is very short. Too short to keep screwing up this song and starting again over and over. Ha! kvo Linda's on stage. Who was she married to anyway? Any of these guys, or all of them? This Paul got a bit pudgy over the years. There were a couple of Lindas, too...Not entirely convinced there was a real or original Paul for anyone to legally marry. kvo But who is this one, supposedly early Liverpool, at about 15:59? I haven't seen this Paul/George photo before. He reminds of the Paul backstage in Detroit in 1966. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WoIQG9qZ_s Look at the pixelation on that mic stand that was manipulated into the photo and how it hides whatever the fuck is going on with that Paul's cheek, beneath his very bruised (and likely glass) eye. Yes, I'd say he matches pretty well with the one doing hand dexterity exercises with playing cards at the stadium. His left hand looks a bit odd in this image, but hard to tell if it's doctored or not. |
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Apr 30, 2022 7:13:34 GMT -5
Life is very short. Too short to keep screwing up this song and starting again over and over. Ha! kvo Linda's on stage. Who was she married to anyway? Any of these guys, or all of them? This Paul got a bit pudgy over the years. There were a couple of Lindas, too...Not entirely convinced there was a real or original Paul for anyone to legally marry. kvo But who is this one, supposedly early Liverpool, at about 15:59? I haven't seen this Paul/George photo before. He reminds of the Paul backstage in Detroit in 1966. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WoIQG9qZ_s Look at the pixelation on that mic stand that was manipulated into the photo and how it hides whatever the fuck is going on with that Paul's cheek, beneath his very bruised (and likely glass) eye. Yes, I'd say he matches pretty well with the one doing hand dexterity exercises with playing cards at the stadium. His left hand looks a bit odd in this image, but hard to tell if it's doctored or not. I'll check out the pixelation. Thanks! There's something kinda sinister about this Paul's eyes that makes him stand out. I also wonder whether he is the Paul we get a brief glimpse of in A Hard Day's Night. He is seated on a sofa with a girl in the nightclub scene where the Beatles blow off answering fan mail and go out clubbing instead. |
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Apr 30, 2022 21:44:11 GMT -5
kvo And here is Liverpool Short Sharp Brows Paul -- who differs from the taller puffier one who eventually looked a bit like Elvis in the 70s and seems to have ceased being a public Paul circa 62/63 Life is very short. Too short to keep screwing up this song and starting again over and over. Linda's on stage. Who was she married to anyway? Any of these guys, or all of them? This Paul got a bit pudgy over the years. But who is this one, supposedly early Liverpool, at about 15:59? I haven't seen this Paul/George photo before. He reminds of the Paul backstage in Detroit in 1966. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WoIQG9qZ_sI'm not sure you really want to know. We used to have poster here Perplexed. He suggested to watch a few French movies made entirely from dolls. We get impression they all are human. You will find them here if you care. Beatles show many of the dolls features. |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 30, 2022 21:48:38 GMT -5
Ha! There were a couple of Lindas, too...Not entirely convinced there was a real or original Paul for anyone to legally marry. Look at the pixelation on that mic stand that was manipulated into the photo and how it hides whatever the fuck is going on with that Paul's cheek, beneath his very bruised (and likely glass) eye. Yes, I'd say he matches pretty well with the one doing hand dexterity exercises with playing cards at the stadium. His left hand looks a bit odd in this image, but hard to tell if it's doctored or not. I'll check out the pixelation. Thanks! There's something kinda sinister about this Paul's eyes that makes him stand out. I also wonder whether he is the Paul we get a brief glimpse of in A Hard Day's Night. He is seated on a sofa with a girl in the nightclub scene where the Beatles blow off answering fan mail and go out clubbing instead. He was missing most of his left leg. Always seen seated. |
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 1, 2022 9:07:59 GMT -5
That would be a foolish purchase. If you want to know about any facet of the McCartney replacement or The Beatles in general, just ask me. I'm not selling anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on May 1, 2022 14:58:39 GMT -5
That would be a foolish purchase. If you want to know about any facet of the McCartney replacement or The Beatles in general, just ask me. I'm not selling anything. |
|
mrshepherd
Hard Day's Night
Living is Easy with Eyes Closed...
Posts: 21
|
Post by mrshepherd on May 2, 2022 12:53:05 GMT -5
Hey, it would mean so much to me seeing as we are all invested in the truth about James Paul McCartney dying in 1966 that I can have a copy of The Memoirs Of Billy Shears. It would mean so much to me, this generosity from you kind souls. I mean it. When I found out McCartney died and was replaced by FAUL, I became chronically depressed and found out more celebs were replaced. I want to see if this book will tell me why, tell me the truth, the horrible truth behind the replacement. Please, I'm in a extremely low paying job and I do not have a bank account so if anyone have the PDF or audiobook, I will be eternally grateful. I'm not sure if there are any complete PDFs or audiobooks of this particular book available for free on the internet, however Google Books does provide a 400-or-so page preview of the book. Unfortunately, it can only be accessible for a few hours as after that time passes a notification on the screen informs you that you can no longer view the site. books.google.com/books/about/The_Memoirs_of_Billy_Shears.html?id=-Y4_DQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false |
|
|
|
Post by kvo on May 9, 2022 16:25:50 GMT -5
I'll check out the pixelation. Thanks! There's something kinda sinister about this Paul's eyes that makes him stand out. I also wonder whether he is the Paul we get a brief glimpse of in A Hard Day's Night. He is seated on a sofa with a girl in the nightclub scene where the Beatles blow off answering fan mail and go out clubbing instead. He was missing most of his left leg. Always seen seated. I was going to match up the Paul seen at 15:59 in the video I originally linked with three other Pauls (making the call that they are all the same person). The three other Pauls I thought he was a match to were the Paul seated on the night club sofa in AHDN, the Paul backstage in Detroit, 1966, and the cigarette smoking, non-piano playing Paul in One Hand Clapping/Nineteen Hundred Eighty-Five. BUT, the One Hand Clapping Paul appears to be on his feet, not seated. A conundrum........ |
|
|
|
Post by B on May 12, 2022 12:14:03 GMT -5
Steve Winwood - Bully (Live at PBS Soundstage 2005)www.youtube.com/watch?v=70FPuVd6_qoSteve Winwood Premiered 4 hours ago Bully (cough)Can you be wrong? You are crooked As the day is long Easy come and easy go Heaven knows the things you took Without my knowin' You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead What's wrong If I broke his hand? Would he understand? Even though he carries on Bully Can you be wrong? You have sunk Below the deepest hole, Easy said, el numero Does it make it taste so sweet Because you stole it? You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead What's wrong If I broke his hand? Would he understand? Even though he carries on Dig it all up Never should have took that from me Burn the light and shine it Burn the light and shine it on
|
|
|
|
Post by kvo on May 13, 2022 10:22:14 GMT -5
Steve Winwood - Bully (Live at PBS Soundstage 2005)www.youtube.com/watch?v=70FPuVd6_qoSteve Winwood Premiered 4 hours ago Bully (cough)Can you be wrong? You are crooked As the day is long Easy come and easy go Heaven knows the things you took Without my knowin' You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead What's wrong If I broke his hand? Would he understand? Even though he carries on Bully Can you be wrong? You have sunk Below the deepest hole, Easy said, el numero Does it make it taste so sweet Because you stole it? You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead What's wrong If I broke his hand? Would he understand? Even though he carries on Dig it all up Never should have took that from me Burn the light and shine it Burn the light and shine it on Yes, Winwood was among the ensemble paying tribute the George Harrison doing "While My Guitar Gently Weeps", linked here. The potential connections between these guys is an interesting puzzle. Personally, I like Prince's guitar work here, even if he behaved like an insufferable ham tossing his guitar at the end. But then, that was Prince. He just had to try to upstage everyone. It was his nature. Must be a reason you put these lyrics up. What are you thinking? Spell it out buddy. 😁😁 www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SFNW5F8K9Y&list=PLlxeckEGjP3lFVqeQjY1E-30DFTFJcrQG |
|
|
|
Post by B on May 13, 2022 22:28:42 GMT -5
Well for one, The song was posted by Steve Winwood on the day I posted it here. I had not been aware of it until now. But - hey! - I mean, it's kind of OBVIOUS isn't it? The lyrics, I mean. It isn't necessarily part of the flow of this thread, I know. But I figured I'd post it here anyway, so there's that. Let's see... "BULLY" - who could that be?  Seems Bully stole a lot from the person speaking in the song. I think Winwood is speaking as someone else here; not himself. We might call the the person speaking as "the joker" and Bully as "the thief". No reason to get excited
The thief, he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But, uh, but you and I, we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us stop talkin' falsely now
The hour's getting late, heyVery late, if I do say so myself. If "the joker" had turned his role over to "the thief" while he was recovering from an accident and temporary(?) blindness, he might say something like: Ooh it's a funny game
Don't believe that it's all the same
Can't think what I've just said
Put the soft pillow on my head
Millions of eyes can see
Yet why am I so blind
When the someone else is me
It's unkind, it's unkind
Oh you're a holiday, such a holiday
Oh you're a holiday, such a holiday
It's something I think is worthwhile
If the puppet makes you (the fans) smile
If not then you're throwing stones
Throwing stones, throwing stonesSo perhaps the thief (who was intended to be a puppet for the wounded individual) 'took' more than he was entitled to. shouldn't have took more than you gaveSo getting back to Mr. Winwood's lyrics regarding "Bully", the joker says You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead. -------So that's why I posted the song.  The details here need some fine tuning. I'll see what I can do.... Footprints in the snow will show
Where the things are still the same
Til you get the warmer sun
Of someone else to live again 
Shouldn't have took more than you gave |
|
|
|
Post by kvo on May 14, 2022 7:12:41 GMT -5
Well for one, The song was posted by Steve Winwood on the day I posted it here. I had not been aware of it until now. But - hey! - I mean, it's kind of OBVIOUS isn't it? The lyrics, I mean. It isn't necessarily part of the flow of this thread, I know. But I figured I'd post it here anyway, so there's that. Let's see... "BULLY" - who could that be?  Seems Bully stole a lot from the person speaking in the song. I think Winwood is speaking as someone else here; not himself. We might call the the person speaking as "the joker" and Bully as "the thief". No reason to get excited
The thief, he kindly spoke
There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But, uh, but you and I, we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us stop talkin' falsely now
The hour's getting late, heyVery late, if I do say so myself. If "the joker" had turned his role over to "the thief" while he was recovering from an accident and temporary(?) blindness, he might say something like: Ooh it's a funny game
Don't believe that it's all the same
Can't think what I've just said
Put the soft pillow on my head
Millions of eyes can see
Yet why am I so blind
When the someone else is me
It's unkind, it's unkind
Oh you're a holiday, such a holiday
Oh you're a holiday, such a holiday
It's something I think is worthwhile
If the puppet makes you (the fans) smile
If not then you're throwing stones
Throwing stones, throwing stonesSo perhaps the thief (who was intended to be a puppet for the wounded individual) 'took' more than he was entitled to. shouldn't have took more than you gaveSo getting back to Mr. Winwood's lyrics regarding "Bully", the joker says You tried to ruin my life It's gonna ruin yours instead. -------So that's why I posted the song.  The details here need some fine tuning. I'll see what I can do.... Footprints in the snow will show
Where the things are still the same
Til you get the warmer sun
Of someone else to live again 
Shouldn't have took more than you gaveWell, I already figured insert the letter "I" for the letter "U" and you get Billy, rather than Bully. "Billy" being a common Beatle code name. Trying to play Ketchup with you, Letter B. Coming down fast, but you're still miles above me. 🤷♀️ I can appreciate the importance of looking at the messaging in totality, rather than in a Beatle vacuum. Thanks for the tips.....I can work it out......Pretty sure, I can anyway. Just need more grant money for research....😁 |
|
.jpg){kind=icon}
