|
Post by noodles on Feb 10, 2006 13:08:58 GMT -5
After they all meet up at the start and John and 'Paul' switch glasses, John puts his sunglasses on, looks up and then forward. It then cuts. As it cuts something flashes up. Anyone got any software one their computer to isolate that frame? I've got something on a disk somewhere and I'll sort it out late if no one else can.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 10, 2006 11:51:49 GMT -5
Lately I've been tempted to make the dreaded "please read previous threads" comment.. It's here somewhere, an animated gif I made of exactly that. Sorry jojo. I had seen the other thread but it was four pages and completely wandered off topic so I started a new one.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 17:01:21 GMT -5
I don't think it's the same guy as the one in my avatar. The 'Paul' in the 'Penny Lane' and 'Strawberry Fields' videos look different from the 'Paul' they were generally using at that time.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 16:39:46 GMT -5
Towards the end of the video The Beatles are sat round a table and George and Faul have guitars brought over to them. Faul takes the guitar as if he's left handed and then starts to switch it round as if he instinctively should be playing it right handed. www.youtube.com/?v=i_q0EbwNk2M
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 10, 2006 9:21:23 GMT -5
B&W Paul dummy has a longer neck...while the Sgt. pepper dummy looks like he doesn't have much of a neck. Maybe the heads aren't real. Maybe they cut and pasted drawings of sad heads on Ringo and Paul. It certainly looks that way with the Paul head.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 8, 2006 17:36:24 GMT -5
Have they never been asked about this? They surely must have a story ready. I'd love to hear it. I did find this. Waxing lyrical at Beatles findTHE original waxwork heads of the Beatles used on the Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album cover have been discovered at Madame Tussauds. The props were presumed missing for nearly 40-years but were found hidden in a store room. Now they are being put up for sale and are expected to fetch up to £80,000 at auction. Only the heads of John Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr have been found. But Madame Tussauds have found another vintage waxwork of Paul McCartney to complete the set. news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=19&id=2047872005
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 17:07:55 GMT -5
I nabbed the dummies picture from another thread as I figured this deserved a thread of it's own. It seems to be a pretty important clue. It proves that a lot of time, effort and money went into creating the 'clues'. It also makes me wonder what those 'clues' are really all about.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 9, 2006 15:24:54 GMT -5
Here's my theory on this song. I realise not everyone sees LSD interview Paul and Mountain Man as two different people, in fact I may be the only one but here's what I think. I think that MM was dating Linda Eastman before he went through the transformation to become Paul. I think this song was written while he was going through this process, while he was on that 'long and winding road' that eventually led to being the permenant Paul which meant he could marry Linda and they could live happily ever after. And they did.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 4, 2006 9:10:33 GMT -5
Fast forward to the year of Paul's pot bust in Japan. It was indeed reported in SOME paper SOMEwhere (I did read it with my own eyes and FREAKED) that Paul was detained longer than he would've been because his fingerprints didn't match those on file belonging to Paul McCartney. It was stated like it was just a minor glitch in the system that was soon cleared up, and back home he went. No mention was made of PID, and no one else ever breathed a word about the subject until the internet comes along. That's very interesting. I hadn't heard about that. So does anybody here know which newspaper(s) this was in?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 6, 2006 4:30:06 GMT -5
There's a thread about this that contains an animated gif that JoJo made. I was trying to find it yesterday but I couldn't. As PP says you see a figure walking across his face. As the figure reaches his nose a car drives past and then it cuts to show a man (who has been following John throughout the video) walking past and staring at him. Here's when it was filmed, LR.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 5, 2006 8:20:36 GMT -5
It's from the 'Penny lane' video. The bit where they project an image on John's face.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 31, 2006 11:38:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 30, 2006 15:22:51 GMT -5
What do you mean us? I'm not one of those crazy TKIN's. There's not links page on the new site. Not that I can see anyway.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 29, 2006 18:24:15 GMT -5
He's really not been on form lately but last night he was superb. Best interview I've heard with him in a long time. And I can't help but think of the whole 'PWR' thing when he talks about our brains editing out up to 50% of what we see.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 25, 2006 14:02:49 GMT -5
You may well be right, LR. I certainly find the lyrics rather questionable. Unfortunately I've not found any information on harmonic mind control so it's hard to study the music to see if it fits the formula. I'd certainly be concerned about any album that gets pushed as a drug album. That said it is a great album.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 19, 2006 7:32:02 GMT -5
To me the backwards lyrics do what they always do. They mostly sound like gibberish, occasionally sound like an actual word and even more occasionally sound like what they're alleged to be saying. I think the fact that The Wizard Of Oz synchs so well with Dark Side Of The Moon is very telling. As beatlies suggested it may be used in MK Ultra programming. Not only has Cathy O'Brien stated that Oz was used to programmed her but others have too including Cisco Wheeler. Springmeier and Wheeler go pretty deep into Oz programming in the link below. People here may also want to check out the Lewis Caroll programming on the same link. www.apfn.org/apfn/oz.htm
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 4, 2006 8:56:01 GMT -5
"They target us because we're a smaller province and it's a smaller industry," the premier said after he emerged from a TV studio in St. John's. "They're not going to take on the beef industry. A seal pup makes a great photo op. "They're not going to get their photo taken with a chicken. It's just not a good photo op." Such a good point. Millions of chickens, cows, sheep, etc are 'grown' (this is the term farmers use) in the most appalling conditions in the UK every year and then slaughtered so why do the 'McCartneys' travel thousands of miles to another country to protest the mistreatment of animals? I smell an agenda. I'm sure many of you remember this story from a few months ago when the 'McCartneys' were attacking China for their mistreatments of dogs and cats. Why attack China? Again in the story and the video clip he makes no mention of the Chinese governments appalling human rights abuses and actually states that if China stopes their dog and cat fur trade then he'll change his attitude towards boycotting them. What about all the other animals Chinese industry is killing 'Paul'? And what about the people of Tibet and China 'Paul'? Does he not believe in boycotting China for human rights abuses? He mentions apartheid South Africa in the interview but the communist dictarorship that runs China apparently doesn't bother him. I've been a vegetarian for almost tens years and I strongly believe that animals should have the right to live just as we do but the imposter and his wife are full of shit.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 19, 2006 7:16:49 GMT -5
Surely it's just because one side of his face is in the light and the other is in the shadow.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 30, 2006 16:21:39 GMT -5
Here's a bunch more photos from that same time period. The more photos I look at from then, the more I'm convinced that it's NOT the same man who is Paul McCarney today. His face is smaller & rounder & his forehead is small, like Paul's was. However, it's NOT Paul. You're right lily. It took me a while to work this out but these two guys are the same. I noticed SFF Paul had dark eyelids and skin around his eyes when I was making my avatar yesterday. And I'm pretty sure this is the you you lot call Bill (why is that?). They've taken the picture at an angle to make his eyes look a little bigger and his chin a little narrower to match the Paul double above. Whether either of these guys is the Sir Paul I'm really not sure. There's something very different about LIB Paul and the baby faced Paul of the Life magazine cover.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 7, 2006 16:19:07 GMT -5
Thank you. Based on my personal observations (I know others disgree and have been investigating this for far far longer than I have) that doesn't look like any of the other Paul's they were using at that time. Hard to tell as the picture's obviously not that clear but he does look like the baby faced Paul on on the 1969 'Hey I'm really actually alive you know' Life magazine cover.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 7, 2006 14:47:16 GMT -5
Though I suspect someone other than Sir FAUL may have been playing the "Paul" role in the SFF/PL films, I think the FAUL we all know was on the scene by the time Pepper was released. Who can forget this portrait of love at first sight from the release party on June 1 1967? "It's amazing what they can do with plastic surgery." You may be right but that's just a picture. It doesn't prove anything. Are there any other photos from this party where we can see 'Paul's' face?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 5, 2006 11:15:10 GMT -5
The problem with those pictures lili is that most of them have been doctored so it's hard to tell exactly which Paul it is. In this picture it looks like they've cut and pasted someone elses eyes onto the image. If you look at the eyelids the skin colour is darker than the rest of his face. And in this one they've drawn around his eyelids with a black pencil. They used that technique a lot later on as they were moving from stage 2 to stage 3 Paul. I think you have to study video/film/movie footage as much as possible to work out how many Paul's there actually were. Obviously with the technology we have today that's a lot easier to do than it would have been 10/20/30 years ago. I''m fairly sure there were two main replacements. This guy... He was Paul from late 1967. I think the interview outside Abbey Road studios in December was his earliest appearence but I may well be wrong. Hard to estimate when he disappears. And this guy... He appears around the time Apple is launched and looks very convinving indeed but by the time we get the 'Let It Be' sessions his face has gone puffy and wonky. You can see it here on this wedding picture. This is Sir Paul. This picture is from the 'Let It Be' book. It's been touched up around the mouth (which was wonky around that time) and they've also done the black pencil around the eyelids. His whole face is very puffed up and mishapen at that point and would be the reason why he grew a beard. What they haven't touched up is his right nostril which shows clear signs of surgery. You can still see this today. This picture shows signs of surgery around his ear possibly froma recent facelift. He certainly looks like he's had one. You can also see blue around the edges of his iris as well as the signs of surgery on his right nostril. There seem to have beem several Pauls from 1966 through to 1968. I can't work out how many, it's very hard to tell. On the left we have 'Strawberry Fields' video Paul. I've crudely painted out his moustache to give a better idea of what he looks like. On the right we have LSD interview Paul. The differences in the eyes, eybrows, nose, chin and basic facial shape are very obvious. I think the Paul from the Mal Evans videos is different again. I don't have a decent copy of this though so it's hard to tell. Then there's Neil Aspinall as Paul. Phew!! That's anough images from me and imageshack.us/ Thank you Imageshack.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 4, 2006 9:18:26 GMT -5
It certainly does look fake and there's an unnatural line aling the edge of the ear that's hidden behind his sideburn.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 27, 2006 18:13:54 GMT -5
Yeh I mentioned the Kevin Keegan thing in the Norman Gunson Interview thread. I was wondering why you hadn't pointed it out. I figured a fellow Brit would spot it. ;D
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 27, 2006 16:47:21 GMT -5
I don't think the interviewer is called Kevin Keaton. I think 'Paul's' talking about the British footballer Kevin Keegan who had just started a brief (thankfully) career as a singer.
It seemed like he'd been studying some old JPM interviews before he did that just to bring in some realism. The lip licking thing is an old JPM trait you don't often see that guy doing too much. He seems strangely uncomfortable throughout it though, hiding behind his guitar, swallowing nervously and making stupid mistakes. I wonder why what is.
Fake ear peeling off? Bodylanguage-wise as soon as he makes the 1950's comment he presses his fingers behind his ears and holds them there in a very unnatural way as if he's just been reminded of his falseness and suddenly is very aware of it. From then on he just keeps messing around in that area pressing things down. If you imagine he's wearing a false ear then it does look like he's having problems with it or just getting insecure about it.
|
|