|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 21, 2008 18:09:55 GMT -5
65if: Anywhere is fine. I find www.mediafire.com/ to be a decent place for file hosting. It's free and doesn't make people jump through many hoops, but Rapidshare, Megaupload, or any other hosting site is fine. Whatever is easiest for you. RAR the thing and leave it somewhere, and I'll see if I can eke anything else out of it with my video tools.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 21, 2008 0:03:46 GMT -5
OK. Here's the slowed-down version. It's practically a frame-by-frame.
This is as good as it gets, unless 65if wants to post the original file somewhere (assuming it's any better than the downscaled YouTube version that I lifted).
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 20, 2008 23:44:50 GMT -5
Look at 0:13 on the video... You can kinda see a face. It's sort of featureless...
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 19, 2008 9:52:23 GMT -5
Well, good.
Whether or not we ever prove Faul is not Paul, I still don't want to see another Beatle assassinated!
So that takes us back to the beginning of this topic--- "We're messing with people out there."
Has anyone been able to decipher the rest of the song?
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 19, 2008 0:27:58 GMT -5
The discussion of Mal's Briefcase seems to have fizzled, but I did some work on the video that was in the case, and I'd like some opinions on it.
I can post a slowed-down one if anyone would like. It will take some time, though.
I explain my view on it at YT, but basically, I think the figure in the video seems sort of odd. I think they're meant to seem inhuman in some way.
Really, this looks like something that should have been on "The X-Files." I mean, what's with the squealing and grabbing the head?
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 19, 2008 0:26:10 GMT -5
Hey... At least I presented it and asked rather than running around proclaiming it the gospel truth!
But yeah-- I've been had.
Good burn.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 17:17:22 GMT -5
Thanks for the clarifications!
It's amazing what things taken out of context can be made to sound like! Baby seals. I guess I missed that one.
As for the music, I'm guessing the Wikipedia entry is a little misinformed, but I couldn't find the boot anywhere else... At least not sounding like the one purported to be the 1995 edit done by the remaining Beatles.
. . .So that leaves us with a good video/sound editor with some musical talent. Hmm.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 17:08:51 GMT -5
Here's the video from the briefcase, lightened up and clarified a bit. It seems to have been shot on very low quality camera (phone?) and thus isn't very conducive to being brightened up. It's pixelated, but it's the best I could do with my setup. Now I'm wondering... Vampires? Piggies? Anyway, have at it, guys.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 17:03:36 GMT -5
Awesome. Very good joke, by the way. You even sold it with the "it's March 31st" stuff. I thought it was too good to be true!
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 15:43:05 GMT -5
I don't know how I missed this, but here's an interesting part of the IAAP puzzle:
This is supposedly a track that John was working on (started Sept 11) and it was given to the poster, QueenOfCosmania. Her information for this video is the truly interesting part of this clue:
"On September 11, 1980 John Lennon had begun work on a double-EP that he tentatively called The Right Album. While Milk and Honey was recorded and mastered at Hit Factory, A & R Studios, and Sterling Sound---all proper studios based in New York City--it was in his own home studio, arranged out of somewhat outdated equipment, that he would dedicate the evening hours to work on this "pet project" of his. Side One would have been made up of avant garde sound collages while Side Two would have contained the more "normal", "acceptable" John Lennon fare. Recording began on September 11 and continued until his death on December 8.
Most of the tapes have been lost. There is (and has been, for quite some time) hearsay that Yoko Ono herself burned these tapes, deeming them unnaceptable for a commercial release. While I don't know about that, I do know that it would have been one of his most daring, experimental albums.
I would often ponder what the ramifications would be were I to release this song. Indeed, it must have been important to John as it was the one song he showed me of this rather arcane project he had undertaken. He and Yoko had begun to spend less and less time together, so it is doubtful that she heard any of it, either.
I have held on to this tape for many years. Yoko has made many attempts to retrieve it from my grasp, but I have held my ground to the bitter end. Ultimately, I never would have had the courage to release this had I not a very special man that you all know as Iamaphoney. He is truly dedicated to his cause, which has become my cause too (though I have since stopped seing him due certain....complications that arose). Iamaphoney has his briefcase; I have this tape. Both are means to the same end.
For those of you who have it this far, congratulations, the truth is here. With Iamaphoney's help I discovered that both forwards AND backwards, this song is loaded with hidden messages. While similar in style (and name, obviously) to Revolution 9, it contained many firsts for a John Lennon composition, such as the use of a vocoder near the end of the song. As someone who always deeply admired John for his experimental nature, this is a truly magnificcent piece and it offers a glimpse it what could have been had he not been shot that fateful December night in 1980.
I have done all that I can do to make the audio prestentable. But the tape is over two decades old, and I'm an artist, not an audio technician. I have a cleaner-sounding but much shorter edit of this on another tape, but unless people are really interested I won't even bother. It's not that I don't care; I am simply a busy woman. None of this is likely to matter soon, because they are getting ready for the big reveal (and it is rapidly approaching), and once the truth is heard once and for all recordings like this will likely seem trivial.
But anyway...
John, this is for you.
You know I always loved you.."
May Pang?
The video is tagged May Pang.
I see socash was in on the discussion at youtube, but I didn't see anything about it here, so I thought I'd bring it to the forefront again.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 15:02:50 GMT -5
I just watched a supposed deleted RA. #100 In it, the words are printed like this:
L.I.LY
Note the lack of a period between the second "L" and "Y"
they also printed things this way:
say it say it say it say it
Check it out:
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 14:46:52 GMT -5
Oh, it's definitely a crucifixion. No doubt there. The costume even sort of matches Crowley's in the photo you provided.
Then again, as I pointed out, Cirque is known for being weird as hell in the first place, and I wouldn't doubt if THEY took some cues from the O.T.O. or some other occult organization.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 14:40:25 GMT -5
Actually, the "killing Paul McCartney" angle is the one that worries me. A lot of IAAP's clues seem to refer to Paul being in danger, and the date when "it" will happen.
I have been thinking about this a lot, too. All the references to Paul (Faul) being evil/associated with Crowley/etc. might be "justification" for a wacko to take Faul out because he thinks he's "saving the world"-- Look at the situation with Lennon.
What if IAAP is just a version of Chapman, mixed with a little Zodiac, for the digital age?
I'm playing devil's advocate here. I don't prescribe to anything yet-- I'm just throwing ideas out there.
I've had thoughts thought as to IAAP's identity. From everything I can research on the subject, the 1995 version of "Now and Then" was NOT released to the public in any way, and no know bootlegs existed before IAAP slapped it onto a RA video.
Where did IAAP get it?
There's one RA video about Heather Mills in which Faul is heard talking to someone about his wives. "My first wife was a groupie, and my next wife was a prostitute." or something to that effect. This sounds like a very private conversation; Not something that Sir Paul would say out loud on BBC 1 or Oprah.
There's another few RA videos where Faul can be heard saying something about clubbing someone to death. Again, I don't recall this being something Macca said in a public forum. This was a private conversation between him and someone close to him.
There are more examples of IAAP getting their hands on things that just Are Not Available to the general public.
Question: How would someone get these conversations, that song, and the other snippets of information?
Answer: IAAP includes a driver, bodyguard, or inside associate of Sir Paul McCartney. It cannot be someone close to him personally, because these conversations would be a tip-off to who it was if it was the person Sir Paul was talking to who recorded them. It is likely a peripheral person-- Someone who Sir Paul sees as "background" and basically ignores or trusts in some capacity.
Another possibility: IAAP includes Heather Mills, who managed to snatch these conversations because she has the wife's inside knowledge of Sir Paul, and she would also have access to the unreleased music if she were- at one point, anyway- a true partner to Sir Paul.
My theory on IAAP is still not wholly formed. Someone in that group has access to insider materials. Someone in that group is an excellent film editor with access to some decent equipment. Someone in that group is a talented music producer and has the equipment for that. Someone in that group can sing well. Someone in that group has some associations (or at least broad knowledge) of Crowley, the occult, the Freemasons, and some seriously secretive things in the lives of the Beatles and their associates.
And then there's that monologue from the unidentified older man, who says very clearly that Paul McCartney died, and that the cover-up is bigger than people imagined, and that his breaking ranks will be seen as a betrayal. He doesn't just sound like some old guy reading a script, either.
I can't discount IAAP completely because of these facts. There's something solid here. I just wonder how much is real and how much is a work?
And as I said in my OP, it could be IAAP saying "we're messing with people out there" or it could be IAAP is pointing out that Beatles and Sir Faul are messing with people out there. I just don't know.
All I do know is that this has more layers than an onion.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 3:51:11 GMT -5
Thanks. I do what I can!
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 3:39:38 GMT -5
I'd take "On The Run" to be a reference to the album & song "Band on the Run" by Wings.
I'd start looking there.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 3:34:59 GMT -5
OK. So I decided to play the backwards game and check out one of IAAP's songs in reverse-- One that hasn't been supplied in reverse by IAAP. This is IAAP's "A Day In The Life" www.mediafire.com/?1msmxzui3gcAbout mid-way through (just past the 2-minute mark) the lyrics clearly say: "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." There are more lyrics, clearly meant to be heard this direction. IAAP records music by singing in reverse. In most cases, the song that IAAP sings is just a reverse version of a Beatles song, so that when you actually play the song in reverse, it sounds like the original Beatles tune being played in the proper direction. Not so in this case. The tune is clearly based on (and titled) "A Day In The Life", but the lyrics that were sung do NOT come out to sound like "A Day In The Life" when the song is reversed. Instead, it's something original. What's more, the music when played forward is the forward version of music from ADITL, but with backwards singing. All the other IAAP songs are the backwards version of the music AND the lyrics, together. "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." Is this IAAP admitting they're just fucking with us all? Or is it supposed to be a statement on behalf of the Beatles? Can anyone make out the rest of the lyrics in this backwards version?
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 2:25:45 GMT -5
Excellent work. Thanks for your efforts!
And I want to say something about the music, now that I've listened to it in this format...
IAAP is scary.
Scary-good with music and production. Scary in his/their actions and intentions. Just plain Scary.
If I'm correct, on a good many of these songs, IAAP is signing in reverse. I mean, REALLY singing the songs in reverse-speech, so that when you play the IAAP version backwards, you get the Beatles lyrics, more or less.
Do you know what kind of dedication it would take to teach yourself to sing these songs phonetically in reverse? yes, some of the Beatles songs have a lot of backmasked parts, where IAAP is singing the words you hear in a backwards Beatles song, but the rest of the time the words had to have been "learned" from listening to the Beatles' songs backwards over and over... Or IAAP just has a skill for it.
Who's the real O.T.O. member here? Faul or IAAP? "Let him talk backwards" indeed.
Amazing, scary stuff. Right up my alley. As a musician (and more) myself, I salute IAAP. Someone there knows what they're doing. This isn't just music.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 2:04:08 GMT -5
I'm not getting how that's the Walrus... I see a human face, with a pageboy haircut, looking to the right. Behind the head is the same face/haircut looking to the left. Did Cirque du Soleil not use a walrus costume to represent the Walrus?
The thing about these photos is that most of the weird stuff is just Cirque Du Soleil being their normal weird selves. It's hard to know what is a clue, and what is just French artistes being French artistes.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 17, 2008 20:22:51 GMT -5
I'm a fan of this guy-- His name's Stevie Riks, and he's quite good. He not only does killer impressions of each of the Beatles, but he actually performs all the music himself for his backing tracks.
Check out his version of the White Album:
Side One
Side Two
I'll also note that he does the most amazing Bowie impression, ever. If Bowie secretly died, and we started a BID forum, Steve Riks is the guy I'd think replaced him.
And it's not even Bowie's song!
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 16, 2008 16:03:20 GMT -5
Being from Michigan, and having lived in Detroit and the surrounding area, I find it interesting how often Detroit comes into this whole topic when you get into the alleged connections.
Terry Knight - Detroit John Small, Dan Carlisle, and Russ Gibb - Detroit PID first publicly announced on radio station in Detroit Manson victim Jay Sebring - Born and raised in Detroit (total coincidence, but still...) Aleister Crowley established the O.T.O. (Equinox) in Detroit. He came in 1919. (9s and 11) Detroit has particular strong Masonic presence & influence: - The Masonic Temple in Detroit is the biggest in the world. Cornerstone placed Sept. 19, 1922, using the same trowel that George Washington used lay the U.S. Capital cornerstone. - It houses the Masonic Temple Theater, which is now managed by Mike Ilitch's Olympia Entertainment, whose predecessors were Olympia Stadium Corporation. - The Beatles played Detroit Olympia Stadium on August 13, 1966 - Mike Ilitch (owner of the Tigers, Little Ceasars, and half of Detroit via Olympia) is a rumored high-level Mason. - Crowley was a high-level Mason (though he ended up at odds with them).
The Beatles were influenced by Detroit's music:
(From an interview in Detroit, September 6th, 1964) Q: "Which artist or musical group do you think has most influenced your music?" JOHN: (jokingly) "Nicki Cuff." PAUL: "Nicki Cuff, I'd say. No, uhh... American colored groups, mainly. And early Elvis Presley." GEORGE: "In fact, The Detroit Sound." JOHN: "In fact, yes." GEORGE: "In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miricles." JOHN: "We like Marvin Gaye." GEORGE: "The Impressions, Marvin Gaye." PAUL & GEORGE: "Mary Wells." GEORGE: "The Exciters." JOHN: "To name but eighty." RINGO: "Chuck Jackson."
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 16, 2008 14:52:57 GMT -5
Actually, if you read that backwards (as the year would indicate), it's indicating either October 50th, 2008 or the 10th day of the 50th month, 2008.
And if the year isn't backwards, then we have a LOOOOONG wait ahead of us. May 1st, 8002 or January 5th, 8002, depending if you're in the United Kingdom colony of Mars, or the United States colony of Venus.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 16, 2008 1:41:10 GMT -5
The whole idea of backwards speech is interesting. Some researchers are convinced that our brains subconsciously structure our sentences to implant our innermost thoughts, truths, and feelings into what we're saying as backwards speech. Basically, what you say when played backwards is the truth, even if you don't intend to say it aloud.
So "I was Willie Campbell" is pretty damning, from that point of view.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 16, 2008 0:29:01 GMT -5
Hey. I like Steve's impressions. He does a smashingly good John. His Bowie's pretty good, too.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 15, 2008 22:27:47 GMT -5
So there it is. He witnessed the Beatles falling apart, first-hand, and wrote a song about it.
It's a mourning tune for apparent (to him) demise of the Beatles.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 15, 2008 22:14:14 GMT -5
Don't know if it's relevant, but in response to the Beatles' "Mr. Moonlight" there is a Bauhaus tune called "Who Killed Mr. Moonlight", and I post it here for your perusal:
Who Killed Mr. Moonlight? Consider green lakes And the idocy of clocks Someone shot nostalgia in the back Someone shot our innocence
A broken arrow in a bloody pool The wound in the face Of midnight proposals Someone shot nostalgia in the back Someone shot our innocence
In the shadow of his smile In the shadow of his smile In the shadow of his smile In the shadow of his smile
All our dreams have melted down We are hiding in the bushes From dead men Doing Douglas Fairbanks' stunts
All our stories burnt Our films lost in the rushes We can't paint any pictures As the moon had all our brushes
Extracting wasps from stings in flight Who killed Mr. Moonlight? Who killed Mr. Moonlight In the shadow of his smile Who killed Mr. Moonlight In the shadow of his smile [/b]
|
|