|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 11, 2019 19:42:41 GMT -5
So they ALL have deformed hands! Does this not contradict the theory that there are a dozen different "Pauls" and multiples of everyone else too! Not in the slightest. Did you read the thread? Again, no. There's no contradiction. Well, since the evidence of abnormal hands goes back to the 50s, they seem to have 'gone in' fucked up. If it makes you feel any better, in all likelihood, they probably had access to much better prosthetics etc. than people missing digits and limbs who were not Beatles. Well, as I mentioned to timmyb52 , 1) we have to start with something to believe in, hold something true, choose a ballast or else there's no base from which to proceed and 2) that's why I've been using fan snapshots as a baseline because they are very unlikely to be retouched beyond the fan in the image having erased their own zit from the picture and, even a well-done laymen's job at that would be discernible with the Error Detection software I posted about upthread. I never know which way you're gonna go, man, lol.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 11, 2019 19:46:01 GMT -5
I saw a post a long time ago where "Tara" EXACTLY matched the "Keith Richards" that now is in the Stones! It is amazing! Interesting. You think you could re-find it? I remember reading people saying that some of the Georges, I think Butcher cover was one of them, looked a hell of a lot like Keith.
|
|
|
Post by B on May 11, 2019 20:22:51 GMT -5
Oh please don't start that again! It's NOT.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 11, 2019 20:32:09 GMT -5
Oh please don't start that again! It's NOT. Huh?
|
|
|
Post by B on May 11, 2019 20:35:50 GMT -5
It's not Keith on the Butcher album.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on May 12, 2019 15:03:16 GMT -5
I saw a post a long time ago where "Tara" EXACTLY matched the "Keith Richards" that now is in the Stones! It is amazing! Interesting. You think you could re-find it? I remember reading people saying that some of the Georges, I think Butcher cover was one of them, looked a hell of a lot like Keith. Here is thread that shows pictures or Tara and the "Keith Richards" now and I still think they match! invanddis.proboards.com/thread/2484/tara-browne?page=12
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 12, 2019 17:12:07 GMT -5
Thanks! I'd seen some of that, but broken out into different contexts. I think the big problem with Keith's face is that it would be unusual if his nose hadn't collapsed (from snorting caustic drugs and their more caustic mixers) and been repaired several times by now and the additional ravaging from sixty years of hard drugs and poor hygiene kind of throws normal aging patterns out the window. The early possible replacement looks too similar in the eyes to the accepted original for me to be able to reflexively agree that it's someone else from just the two pix. I tossed 16 images of Keith from '65 & '66 into my software, along with the decades of various Georges already in there, and had expected it would suggest a possible match between Keith and least one of the Georges. To my surprise, it did not. So, I'm curious just on a sort human bias level what it is we think looks so similar between them that biometrically just isn't there. It's not just a scrawny guy with dark hair and high cheek bones. We're viscerally responding to something. Someone in the thread you linked to suggested astrological rising signs might be a factor. Like everything else unsupported by science, I don't believe in astrology anymore, but it's interesting to consider. It's, also, probably worth keeping in mind that there wasn't a hell of a lot of ethnically diverse immigration/intermarriage/reproduction in the UK in the 1940s and it's really not that big of a place so people are more likely to look alike than different and genetic mutations, such as the syndactyly, should be expected to appear in geographic clusters...because: inbreeding. Nothing like a little conversation on a discussion board!
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on May 12, 2019 19:39:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 13, 2019 13:49:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on May 14, 2019 11:49:32 GMT -5
Yes I agree that there are a BUNCH of "Keefs" and a BUNCH of "Taras"!
I guess no surprise there!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2019 3:21:28 GMT -5
I'm not agreeing that they're the same person. Every KEEF! I've seen has had dark beady eyes and all the Taras seem to have huge blue eyes. And I can't say I've looked at enough documentation to convince me that there was more than one KEEF!, but I can't conclusively say there wasn't more than one, either.
But I do think it's *likely* that many of these people, even the ones who weren't playing musical chairs with their identities, were/are a lot more closely related than one might assume or than has been revealed.
|
|
|
Post by B on May 17, 2019 10:32:59 GMT -5
Tara obviously went on to become Eminem.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on May 17, 2019 14:04:45 GMT -5
I'm not agreeing that they're the same person. Every KEEF! I've seen has had dark beady eyes and all the Taras seem to have huge blue eyes. And I can't say I've looked at enough documentation to convince me that there was more than one KEEF!, but I can't conclusively say there wasn't more than one, either. But I do think it's *likely* that many of these people, even the ones who weren't playing musical chairs with their identities, were/are a lot more closely related than one might assume or than has been revealed. Keef being replaced is even more obvious than Paul McCartney. That's why I've pinned this thread of tweets to my twitter
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2019 14:54:11 GMT -5
Tara obviously went on to become Eminem.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2019 15:09:17 GMT -5
Keef being replaced is even more obvious than Paul McCartney. He very well may have been replaced at some point, but all I'm seeing in these images is orbital hollowing and other indicators of fat/collagen loss. I see no actual structural differences. You got any ear or profile comparisons? I thought the KEEF! being replaced theory focused on the original (a Keith with a different last name) disappearing/being disappeared before the early Stones even began to gain momentum-?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2019 16:33:41 GMT -5
This is a relevant anomalous hand post that michelle made in a different thread: invanddis.proboards.com/post/127309The info she links to is quite curious and draws me back to my suspicions about Dezo Hoffman and the possibility that one set of Beatles were Eastern Bloc.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 18, 2019 15:26:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on May 19, 2019 16:26:42 GMT -5
Sage of Quay™ - Mike Williams - Faul "6 Toes" McCartney (May 2019)www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HCEHjjtpE8Mike Williams' Paul Is Dead Channel Published on May 19, 2019 ----------------------------"Cut my toes off to spite my feet I don't know whether to laugh or cry Never mind, check my rhythm I'm the man on the flaming pie"
|
|
|
Post by michelle on May 19, 2019 17:29:45 GMT -5
Sage of Quay™ - Mike Williams - Faul "6 Toes" McCartney (May 2019)www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HCEHjjtpE8Mike Williams' Paul Is Dead Channel Published on May 19, 2019 ----------------------------"Cut my toes off to spite my feet I don't know whether to laugh or cry Never mind, check my rhythm I'm the man on the flaming pie" Letter B1, please don't pray on person's handicap for your entertainment!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 19, 2019 18:07:05 GMT -5
What exactly is "the pie"? EDIT: Mad Day Out Missing Toes Paul is still Out There stomping on pies:
|
|
|
Post by B on May 19, 2019 18:20:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 19, 2019 18:30:49 GMT -5
I'm flattered that the co-intel faction is misdirecting towards the feet, a body part fully enclosed in shoes often enough to provide exactly zero assistance in differentiating between the many (not two!) Pauls.
Wasn't Mikey supposed to be shifting his research to ghouls and demons and the I Ching?
|
|
|
Post by B on May 19, 2019 18:32:53 GMT -5
Letter B1, please don't pray on person's handicap for your entertainment! I would never pray on Faul's hands, cap, feet, or any other parts.
|
|
|
Post by B on May 19, 2019 18:39:35 GMT -5
ghouls and demons same cha-Ching!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 19, 2019 18:41:54 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that the shearing pic is flipped because of the curled pinky on what should be his left hand.
|
|