|
Post by iwilliam on May 3, 2015 19:09:33 GMT -5
None of the Beatles wrote autobiographies Technically, yes, this is true-- but not entirely! "Many Years From Now" was written by Barry Miles, so it is technically a biography, rather than an autobiography. However, it was written with the help of Paul, and the book reads somewhat like a very long interview with the man about his own life. Excellent book, by the way... even if it comes across a little one-sided at times. Read alongside a possibly slightly-less-biased work like "You Never Give Me Your Money," I think a lot of insight can be had on the careers of The Beatles.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Nov 8, 2014 16:36:23 GMT -5
The 73 year old wouldn't happen to be a certain well known born again christian, would he? Try googling harriet webb. well now perhaps I should draw your attention to what's happening in the US where a provider of a forum as been put in prison for what someone else had said on their website. But hey look at some Pathe News archives filmed in the Channels Islands Are you certain you're remembering that correctly? Because that doesn't sound quite right, to me. Could you tell me the name of the website in question, and what was said? The reason I ask this.... I'm not sure if you're from the US or not, but we're pretty serious about our right to free speech. And there are only a couple circumstances under which someone is prohibited, by law from speaking freely. And only one common circumstance in which speech could lead directly to jail. Of course threatening and harassing speech is not permitted. Making a threat of bodily harm could easily land someone in jail. Speech that is considered defamatory and libelous, might get a person in trouble. But it has to be stated as a fact. I could say "It's my opinion that you seem like a child molester, but I can't prove it." I could print that in the newspaper, and there isn't much you could do about it. It's a personal opinion. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#Public_figure_doctrine_.28absence_of_malice.29In other words, if I genuinely believe what I'm saying is true, I may be protected by US law, whether it's stated as an opinion or a fact. Furthermore, less than half of the sates in the US have CRIMINAL libel laws. The others are civil. Meaning someone can try to sue you for libel, but you are unlikely to end up in jail over it. Furthermore, despite laws on the books, actual cases of criminal libel are rare-to-nonexistent. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_lawSo I strongly suspect that someone has misinformed you, or perhaps you're remembering incorrectly. But if I'm wrong about that, I'd love to hear some details. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Apr 21, 2014 17:26:21 GMT -5
A little while ago I reported member "wolesbrow" for a thread titled "Stil, haus Kit, che, ns Review" The entirety of the post was: "This Forum is probably the best forum that i have ever used and i would just like to say how proud i am to be a member of this forum." Google tells me that "Stilhaus Kitchen" does indeed have a website. Actually, they seemingly have NUMEROUS websites, each with slightly different names / urls, plus a facebook page, of course, etc. What I find most interesting, however, is their page on a website called SCAMbook... and here's where it gets even funnier. If you go to the scambook page for "stilhaus kitchen" you will see it appears that this company is SPAMMING the hell out of their own scambook page!www.scambook.com/company/view/152061/Stilhaus-KitchensWhat these spam-happy morons may not realize, is that every time they spam this page, it registers as a new "complaint" against their company. So someone quickly looking at the page and not reading individual comments might glance at the statistics, see "63 Complaints" and say "No, I think I'll look somewhere else." Someone in their marketing department needs to pull their head out of their ass! I believe there may be legitimate complaints against them, as this website shows that there are over $10,000 in reported unresolved damages against this company! But I didn't feel like digging through 11 pages of un-sorted spam, to find the real complaints. Maybe that's what ass-head was going for, after all, with all the spammy "complaints." But after reading through a bunch of the spam on that scam-report site (and some of it was pretty elaborately-written spam) I am left with the impression that this is a VERY SCAMMY, unscrupulous company. I mean... why have like 10 different websites? That seems odd. Usually brands striving for recognition try to do the exact opposite. Please do recognize that I'm not shilling for these assholes, as I think my post history will illustrate (don't ban me! lol) But here is what I mean: www.stilhauskitchens.com/stilhauskitchens.co.uk/www.stil-hauskitchens.co.ukwww.stilhauskitchenss.co.uk/ (note the extra "s" in the url. Kitchens s" www.stilhauskitchenswarrington.co.uk/www.stilhauskitchensuk.co.uk/www.stilhauskitchens-uk.co.uk/www.stilhaus-kitchens.co.uk/www.stilhauskitchensreviews.co.uk/www.stilhauskitchens-1.co.uk/(seriously... it keeps going on like that! Can you believe this shit? I've almost never wanted to do business with a company any less in my entire life. They could practically be giving stuff away, and I'd want to tell them to piss off. The internet version of that annoying acquaintance, who just couldn't take the hint....) Stilhuas is even creating websites that don't have their somewhat predictable name in the url. Even up to and including websites to make sure we all know that stilhaus is not owned by Vance Miller, "The Kitchen Gangster,": www.vancemillerskitchens.co.uk/stil-haus-kitchens-vance-miller.phplol But this is where it gets a little weirder, and more interesting... Namely, with this site I checked out, which is one of the first google results for "Stilhaus Kitchens" that does not feature their name in the url: www.speedykitchens.co.uk/As you may have been able to predict, by now, this site also appears to have been made by stilhaus kitchens. In it, they describe a rivalry with a competitor, "Lee Jones," and his business, "Speedy Kitchens," and an incident... the reason for the creation of this website: They then go on to claim they will beat any quote from Speedy Kitchens. Oh, and in case you hadn't looked at the site, here is one of the pictures they include of this Lee Jones person. Very...uh... interesting fashion sense: imgur.com/JB7ohUVSo what should I make of all this? It seems obvious that we're dealing with a spam-tastic kitchen company. And then we have their potential Beatle-fan competitor who has supposedly slandered them online. So perhaps Lee is spamming their name to make them look bad? Or is that just what stilhaus wants me to think...? (lol) With all the pro-stilhaus spam I've seen online in such a very short search, I'm somewhat inclined to go with options A or C. But the jacket is a pretty funny coincidence. Oh... and that scambook site? They also have a complaint page for Speedy Kitchens Lee Jones. There is only 1 complaint on it. With the following text: "Speedy kitchens will just take your money and run like they did with ours. We worked so hard to save up for a kitchen and they delivered half a kitchen and now they don’t want to know. Warning speedy kitchens are connected to vance miller. Google Vance Miller " www.scambook.com/company/reports/153148/Speedy-Kitchens-Lee-JonesHm... If there's any doubt, "someone" is even spamming against Lee Miller and his Speedy Kitchens on Hunger Games Fan Forums! (Y'know... the Young Adult "Hunger Games" trilogy?) The thread appears to have since been deleted, but you can presently still see it via googled "cached" option. The text is basic, but pretty clear: "Speedy Kitchens. Warning speedy kitchens are connected to vance miller. Google Vance Miller." webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_NuhmmUf9I0J:www.hungergamestrilogy.net/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D19%26t%3D5963%26sid%3D28ce3f0a4468de6d2257bbdcd793a0c5+&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnkYeah... someone needs to cut the crap with all the spam. We don't care about your crappy kitchen company. Sorry for the rant, and dumping all that info... I just did a little digging, and thought someone else might find this interesting, as well.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 27, 2013 17:49:32 GMT -5
Speaking of Esoteric / Occult imagery.... I'm not sure I ever noticed this, but on the Alternate "Yesterday and Today" cover (trunk version) Lennon sort of resembles "The Hanged Man" from the Rider Waite tarot deck, with his leg positioning.
Just kinda jumped out at me.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 16:35:38 GMT -5
I kind of agree with skyw's point here. I am right handed and I've used my left hand for lots of things. Including holding cups, drinking, smoking, using a lighter, etc. I am, however, more likely to use my right hand for any of these things. But it's not particularly unusual, or remotely difficult, to use my left. I also don't normally wear watches, but I've worn them on either wrist, at various points.
However, I have also seen pics of him apparently playing right-handed guitar... which is mega weird.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 16:29:06 GMT -5
Wat... WTF? Is that an album cover? Now you understand its significance?! ?!!!
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 16:10:55 GMT -5
linus It's actually been speculated that the Elusinian Mysteries of the Greeks may have included a psychedelic sacrament made from the Ergot fungus. Not a lot is known about these "mysteries" or what was done, or revealed (as they were secret, of course, hence the name "mysteries" lol). But it is known that they used a beverage they called "kykeon," which was known to be supposedly made from barley, and ergot aka claviceps purpurea can grow on barley. This becomes even more interesting and relevant to the present discussion when we consider that The Elusinian Mysteries were held by the cult of Demeter and Persephone. Demeter, of course, was the goddess of the harvest. So grains (like barley) would have been within her realm. And persephone? Ah yes... Persephone is the Queen of the Underworld. The Queen of the Underworld, who actually went to the underworld, and came back, no less. Death and resurrection symbolism, anyone? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleusinian_Mysteries#Entheogenic_theoriesAnd to bring this whole thing back full circle, I'd have to say that I bet the chemicals found it the ergot fungus would probably make the beatles sound pretty freakin fantastic. Not that I know this from personal experience or anything, of course....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 15:37:10 GMT -5
1- I don't think this is all that weird. Actors on shows (or in movie sequels) do get replaced all the time. It's not ideal, and they don't do it when they can help it, but it is done plenty. The one thing that is slightly weird, is that the replacement looks so much alike. Usually they can't find someone that looks so alike. He's not a dead ringer, though. I don't think I'd confuse the two (the original had the pointiest chin ever. I mean seriously... lol) 2- You might have a point about the all-seeing eye thing, though. I've caught that all-seeing eye in tons of Disney stuff. Other masonic and occult symbolism as well. Plenty of evidence to be found online. I'm wondering what else that shape might represent, though. Is that a symbol from the show, that little spiral thing? 3- Speaking of occultic / masonic symbolsim: Of course this "makes sense" because his name is Mitchel Musso. However, I'll point out that Marilyn Manson has used a similar symbol. Of course, given the name, that makes sense too. But I've also seen Madonna and Rick Ross use weird double or triple "M" symbols. Not sure if there is any other weird occult significance there, but "MM" is a sideways 33 (sort of) and also stands for Master Mason. Just saying....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 15:16:03 GMT -5
NothingIsReal1985 I responded to your post in another thread. I think my response applies to what you wrote here as well, and I ask that you read it: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/2575/physical-evidence?page=4&scrollTo=106592Honestly, I kind of wish I'd seen your post here before I wrote that. I probably would have been a little more thorough, and probably a little more stern / harsh with you. No offense. But you write as though you've got it all figured out, and everyone else is stupid. You said, to Beacon: Now, I don't know if maybe you think "notwithstanding" means something different than it really does***, but Beacon is probably one of the most knowledgeable people in the field of PID in the world. He's studied it like it's the bible. He's written multiple books on the subject. For you with 23 posts to come in here and speak to Beacon as though he doesn't know shit, is somewhat insulting to me. I can't imagine how poor Beacon must feel. It's funny-- you speak like you are privvy to "The Real Truth" and everyone else is just deluded, and you're prepared to argue against anyone, no matter what. Yet, in your post, you said this: What I gather from this (taken with everything else you posted) is that the ultimate, "objective" truth doesn't really matter-- you're just firm about your position, whatever that may be, and unwavering, and unwilling to consider any conflicting info or evidence, that you're ready to argue with people, and "cuss them out" and call them stupid sheeople or whatever, if they don't agree with you. Do you not see how your current position is exactly identical to your former position, with the one small change of which side you're standing on? If you really care about finding the objective truth, such a position will only hinder you. But of course, your post gets even better...: Ah, so that's why you know that you're 100% right and the rest of us are just deluded sheep? Because god told you so?. Sweetheart, god has "told" lots of people lots of things throughout human history. 99.9999% of the time this can be proven as delusion. I'm not trying to shit on your beliefs. I believe in god, and I also believe that if a person can still their mind enough, that in a manner of speaking, they can get "impressions" if you will... not quite the same as being spoken to... but a gentle feeling, that something is right or wrong. The thing is, there is no objective way of confirming this, much of the time. And such a system is completely prone to self-delusion. And if you're the kind of person who can't truly "still your mind" as I say, and keep your personal ideas and opinions out of it, you're more likely to get the delusional part. I think having beliefs and convictions is great. I really do. But insulting people, and telling them that they don't know shit, because god told you that you're the PID-messiah sent to lead us all to salvation....? That's very much not cool. We're all here because we find this stuff interesting. If you're still somewhat new to the whole PID thing, you may just be learning that a lot of people, have widely differing beliefs. I think you will find, that with your "half of all celebrities have been replace with evil doppelgangers" belief, that you are very much in the minority in the PID scene. With the exception of a few boards, like TKIN as mentioned earlier. From what you've written here, it almost seems like you'd fit in better there. More people to agree with you, and less people you'll have to call "sheep"... if that's all you're looing for. If you're instead looking for objective discussion, regarding a wide range of theories-- then you're in the right place. I just really think you need to open your mind a little more. Not sure how you can't see that one. I mean, by your own admission, just a few years ago you were on the other side, ready to insult anyone who saw things differently. And now... you're on the other other side, and.... ready to insult anyone who sees things differently. You know that both of these positions can not be right. So at one point, at least, you were ready to insult others in defense of a wrongly-held position. Consider the fact that this may presently be the situation you're in. It is possible both of your positions are wrong. And as much as you need to open your mind a little more, you definitely need to cut the shit with your subtle insults. No one needs that. Like I said, we're all in the same boat here. We're just very interested in this phenomenon, and curious about the truth. That's where the similarities end. Personally, I think "Faul" is an AMAZING musician. I think post-1966 "Paul" beats the pants off of pre-1966 Paul, any day of the week. If you want a forum where almost everyone else agrees with you that "Faul is shit," like I said, there are places for that. Plenty of that on TKIN. Plenty of that on Tina's forum, too: pid.hoop.la/topics lots of people there to agree with you that Faul is a horrible musician, and an evil satanic clone, replaced by the CIA and the tavistock institute, alone with Fohn Lennon and Lady Gaga and Gwen Stefani. You can spew all the hate you want, and plenty of people around to mindlessly agree with it. Or you can stay here and open up your mind a little, maybe try to speak in a slightly less condescending manner.... Or just disregard everything I've said. I've only been studying this for over ten years... what the hell do I know? (*** It means "nevertheless," "regardless," or "in spite of this..." which would make that sentence nonsensical)
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 14:30:10 GMT -5
NothingIsReal1985 -- don't fall into the trap of thinking you know what the truth is, and everyone else are just stupid sheep. Once you do that, you start looking for evidence that will fit into your pre-conceived notions and reject anything else. Then you end up further and further from the truth. People have studied this for years. Some of us have obsessed over it. And still, none of us, not one (barring any closet-insiders) knows what the truth is, for certain.
This isn't an accusation, BTW-- just a piece of advice. Though I mention it because I feel I see at least the beginnings of such an attitude in your post. Talking about PIA'ers being "in denial" and such.... and I'm sure for some that's not far from the truth. Some people refuse to even consider anything but the "official" story in any matter. I've seen plenty of those. The people who comment "UR all SOOOO Sttoopid!" on PID youtube vids and such...
.... but I've studied this phenomenon for years, myself. Sometimes going through periods where I would read about it for hours each day... and still I am not 100% certain that the "original" paul died, or was replaced, or anything else. I am fairly confident there is "something" to all these clues-- though whether that "something" is a cover-up about Paul's death I can not say with any measure of certainty.
Confidence can be great. It can help in a lot of areas of life. But being overly confident that you've got it all figured out, and everyone else is just dumb, is a risky, somewhat dumb attitude to take. Simply put, not only because it blinds people to new evidence, as I mentioned above, but all those people who think PID'ers are crazy, and full of shit....? They're all pretty confident about that, aren't they?
Opinions can be dangerous things. Doubly so for absolute and unwavering ones.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Sept 8, 2013 14:05:04 GMT -5
Checked it out. And yes, I agree that this is interesting. I also feel like I've seen this before, somewhere. Other than IAAP's site, that is.... but I can't recall where. I think it's funny when PID-skeptics point out something like "he was only saying 'cranberry sauce,' he admitted it," not realizing just how many conflicting stories exist in the mythology, regarding these little tidbits. Conflicts which, many times, come from the beatles themselves, or those close to them, no less.... Thanks for posting.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Aug 6, 2013 20:24:51 GMT -5
Okay, so being a bit bored I checked to see if there were any interesting PID related videos on youtube I might have missed. I encountered the following video. And at around 3:00 to 3:11 my mind was BLOWN.
It appears as though when you "mirror" the LILY on the cover of Ram, you end up with something very much like IIIX. And of course we all know about the Sgt Pepper drum.
Perhaps this is a repetition of that clue. Or maybe this is telling us to go back to Pepper to look...
Either way it seemed interesting, and a little too coincidental.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jun 6, 2013 17:24:14 GMT -5
Linus-- Interesting point with the MMT shots of Lennon and his pose.
I'm still not sure if that's the correct interpretation here, however, I did just notice something: Compare the sleeves on Lennon's outfit in those shots, to the garb of the occultists. Because of those exaggerated sleeves on Lennon, it does almost look like he's wearing a "Tau Robe." Interesting...
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jun 6, 2013 14:24:43 GMT -5
Yeah, it really annoys me when some of the better videos turn up missing.
And seeing a great vid get appled or EMIed is like a slap in the face.
Which offers yet another opportunity to wonder why this has never happened to iamaphoney....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on May 21, 2013 18:23:48 GMT -5
When I spoke with the guy who was restoring Paul's Aston Martin, he told me that people from Discovery Channel said to him that they were going to make an outstanding “revelation” when Paul will pass away This is so tantalizing and teasing, but with a glimmer of promise.... But if "people" from Discovery knew something... why would they tell some random guy whose connection is a car? And if they told him anything, why not tell him something of substance? How did you not completely grill this guy for information? lol I'd be sad to see Sir Paul die, whether for the first or second time. But damn it, I really want to know. I wonder why only after his death?
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on May 21, 2013 17:51:57 GMT -5
Wow... that girl lifting her shirt to show the tat looks a lot like my crazy ex girlfriend.
Creepy.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on May 21, 2013 17:42:10 GMT -5
Le Blanc-Seing I'm sure it's quite possible, likely even, that one influenced the other and there is no connection, but seeing that immediately brought to my mind this old cover of a fairly well-known fantasy novel:
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Mar 11, 2013 14:01:02 GMT -5
This solopsism is reminiscent of IAMEYE (our heavenly mother). I am. I Will : I am ? :lol: Seriously, though... kinda hard to tell from the size in the picture, but that looks like Sir Paul's MBE medal to me.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Feb 10, 2013 16:10:54 GMT -5
Ok. But the topic of this thread is the biometric comparison of Paul's face, body, voice. .. Don't you think this Bob Crane thing is quite OT? in the middle of the thread P(D)enny La(i)ne gives us a tidbit about Don Knotts probably standing in for Brian Epstein at some point and linked us to some interesting video clips that makes you wonder if Knotts really was somehow involved.
My point is, no one gave him shiite about it even though "the topic of this thread is the bio-frigging-metric comparison of Paul's face body, voice". If my little aside and question REALLY bothers you, I'll move it somewhereNot sure if it was intended to, and maybe this is just me, but your reply came across as slightly hostile. Or maybe just defensive. I don't think your "aside" bothered him, or anyone, per se. However, I think I see where he's coming from... or at least, I have had similar thoughts..... You see, IMO one of the great and interesting things about the whole PID / PWR thing, is that one subject, and line of speculation, can lead to another, which leads to another, ad infinitum. Beginning with one theory, idea, or piece of information, I can end up reading for hours going from one thing, to another, to another. And as I said-- this is sometimes one of the great and interesting things about the PID / PWR phenomenon, and forums on the subject.... However, sometimes one of the truly frustrating and annoying things about the PID / PWR phenomenon, and related forums, is that very same thing. Sometimes it's great to hear other theories or ideas thrown into the mix for consideration. But often that can side-track or de-rail a thread quite severely. And sometimes when you're trying to stay along one line of speculation, it can be a little frustrating, or at the least confusing and complicating, when people start lengthy tangents on a new idea-- when following typical forum ettiquette-- meaning starting a new thread, and simply making a quick mention of the topic and a link to the new thread, instead of trying to side-track the discussion, would be just as effective, and easier to follow. I don't know why this practice seems so endemic to PID / PWR forums... but it is. Certain members, I have also noticed, tend to do it far far more than others. Not to point any fingers. Just to give a point of contrast-- while I don't entirely agree with the practice, and most forums are fairly lenient with this kind of thing, I'm a member of a couple forums where a post that far off topic would be automatically, without question, deleted upon a mod noticing it. I think that's a bit extreme, and harsh, but I'm sure you get the idea..... I think he was just pointing out that it was off topic, which it was-- very off topic. And on that note, while it would have been slightly more work for you, or P(D)enny La(i)ne for that matter, it might have better facilitated ease of reading and clarity of discussion had you started a new thread on that topic, and made a post like "hey guys, I think this idea somehow relates to this other theory, which I made a thread about and here's the link....." Just my 2 cents... as I have noticed this kind of thing here (and similar forums) quite a lot, and while sometimes it seems to enhance discussion, sometimes it seems to muddy the waters. I personally don't mind the minor aside here and there, as long as it isn't too long, and doesn't over-run the original topic. Especially if the original topic is very interesting, as this one is IMO.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Feb 4, 2013 15:52:54 GMT -5
The latest front page thread on ATS... www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread923497/pg2#pid15864490Yeah, I'm "Switching Yard" and there isn't much more to say to the naive thread readers over there. Are they being led down a merry path by a shill? Who knows, maybe. Deal With The Devil, my arse. Funny, that your post is right above one by a dude named "iwilliam." What kind of a freak name is that? lol
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jan 29, 2013 16:17:03 GMT -5
Oh, also... looking at the cover, I noticed that there is at least one, possibly two figures who are looking "on Jung." One to Jung's right, named Simon Rodia (listed as "creator of Watts Towers" and who is actually facing to the left, toward Jung, whereas most of the figures face more or less forward) and another, Lenny Bruce, to the left of Jung whose eyes might be going in that direction, though it's hard for me to tell.
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jan 29, 2013 15:26:17 GMT -5
In case you missed the thread-- today I was speculating whether the lyric "looking through a glass onion" might be a play on words-- "Looking through a glass on Jung...." Carl Jung, of course, being on the Sgt. Pepper cover. Are we being told of another place to apply a mirror? Thread here: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Clues&thread=7194&page=1If only I had the present ability to test this out, myself....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jan 29, 2013 15:23:25 GMT -5
Okay, this is a somewhat speculative stab in the dark. I've recently taken a strong interest in a thread here "Solution to Sgt Pepper Enigma, which can be found here: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=5758&page=1Now it was in the context of that thread which I came up with this speuclation. However, this speculation may apply regardless of the truth or invalidity of that information. The starting point was the idea that Lewis Carroll and "Looking Glass" are a part of the Beatles / Paul enigma. As is pointed out either in the above thread, or the Alice Statues thread (forget which) they lyric "Looking through a glass onion...." may directly reference this, and provide a clue toward deciphering the greater puzzle. (Likewise with the looking glass ties of "L.S.D"..... "ties" being synonymous with "connections.") So today I'm in the kitchen making myself a burrito (yum) and singing "Glass Onion" to myself. It was then that it struck me-- first of all, WTF is a "glass onion?" I can understand maybe Lennon chose "looking through a glass onion" to reference the Lewis Carroll story. However, that would leave us with "Looking through a glass...." and so how might "onion" fit in? Do we really think that word at the end of a potential clue might be randomly chosen? It was then, that the idea occurred to me...... I heard the line kind of slowed down, syllable by syllable.... and the last words.... "glass on---yun" And something clicked..... "Looking through a glass.... on Jung?" Carl Jung appears on the cover of Pepper. Are we being told of another place to apply a mirror?On that note.... does anyone know of any free decent software or websites that allow photo manipulation-- particularly mirroring certain sections of a picture? I haven't had / been able to locate my booklet for Sgt Pepper in ages, so I'm afraid I'm only left with digital copies... otherwise I'd be busy testing my theory, instead of prematurely writing this.... Thanks for reading...
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jan 27, 2013 23:00:31 GMT -5
I'm not impressed with the Pan result. Seems like someone is just trying to scam a few bucks on this. "Code Keys" --- not likely. I agree the Pan thing wasn't a super-impressive example, but to me it hinted at the possibility of some interesting observations, at the least. Further, the first posts in this thread seemed to imply some of the pdfs on that site might have been free. I did a search for the author of that site, Michael West, and didn't come up with a lot. There is a guy by that name who does some acoustic Beatles covers, so it may even be the same dude, but nothing relating to this, as far as I could tell. Anyway... one of the things that really grabbed my attention about this, is that Mr. West here makes a few comments which tie to a thread (here at NIR) which really grabbed my attention yesterday. So much so that I obsessively read through all 21 pages of it, plus repeatedly googled for more info. The thread I'm referencing is the "Solution to The Sgt. Pepper Enigma" started by Jarface. It can be found here: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=5758What this guy mentioned, on one of the pages of this now-downed website was first this: Emphasis added. If you read the thread I linked above, you will see that Jarface ties the Beatles and Sgt Pepper to the story, "The Gold Bug," by Pepper Cover Alum, Edgar Allan Poe. West goes on to write: If you take a look through the Jarface thread linked above, you might see how I would draw similarities. This guy brings up the obvious Carroll connections, too. Hm... maybe I should post this in that other thread.....
|
|
|
Post by iwilliam on Jan 27, 2013 20:39:42 GMT -5
Thank you, overdude. That did lead me to something I wasn't able to find on my own. Unfortunately, it didn't give me much info.
|
|