|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 2, 2004 19:32:00 GMT -5
FP used a special brush for the beard, did other stuff for the part in the hair. That's the same guy. Good drawing Bug. But I still see two different people eventhough they look similar in this pic. They would have to to pull this off for so long. The distance between the eyes and the place at where the eyes are set on the face is different. JP's eyes are wider apart and they are set lower on his face in relation to his nose. Plus the overall shape of the head is different, one is round and the other is long, which is THE difference you really can't make up for. The similarities are the result of good plastic surgery. ;D
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on May 19, 2006 14:53:43 GMT -5
I remember seeing footage of one of Brian's birthday parties from the late 60's/early70's and there was Bill smoking a cigarette with Linda sitting next to him.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Apr 17, 2006 14:20:43 GMT -5
Many believe there is a connection with Brian Jones death and the coverup behind Paul's. But I doubt Keith would be the killer.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 31, 2006 15:17:54 GMT -5
Let me add, on a smaller note, Mia Farrow left her hit show and then supposedly married Frank Sinatra and looked VERY different, like a totally different person.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Oct 15, 2004 16:16:12 GMT -5
Don't know who she is....
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Oct 14, 2004 22:48:41 GMT -5
...yes correct! Well anyway, I thought it was a good observation.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Oct 14, 2004 12:58:44 GMT -5
Someone just mentioned this on the "other" board but in the Free As A Bird video the date on Eleanor Rigby's grave is Sept 12th. Many of you already know this but I thought I'd bring it up again anyways.
Perhaps we have a scenario where Paul wrecked his car on Sunday, September 11th, died a slow painful death and was dead offically on Monday the 12th and then his body was discovered on Tuesday, September 13th, i.e. Stupid Bloody Tuesday. Seems simple enough...
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 28, 2004 8:45:25 GMT -5
If it was unintentionial---that is a miracle. Who knows. Not as much of a miracle as you might think, Doc. Ever heard of reverse speech? (www.reversespeech.com) I bet some of the Beatles' clues were unintentional and were the result of reverse speech. I honestly can't imagine John figuring out that the words 'Lonely Hearts' would equal "1 one IX he ^ die" when putting a mirror through the center of it. That is such a long shot to me. Unless he had connections with Aleister Crowley a la Jimmy Page. How would he know that would equal those words? The 'Lonely Hearts' to me equals the Beatles' lonely hearts as the result of their left-handed bassist dying.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 25, 2004 8:06:43 GMT -5
I think Ringo went to Amaria, Spain to see John while John was filming "How I won the War" because he was "lonely".
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 24, 2004 8:00:36 GMT -5
Perhaps Paul died in a car wreck on the way home from the Melody Maker awards that night, Sunday, September 11th? Concerning the "Lonely Hearts" mirror print on the drum that spelled out "1 one IX ^ HE DIE", this may sound strange, but I think that clue was unintentional.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 23, 2004 14:59:44 GMT -5
Please take the time to vote everyone and give the actual time you think Paul died. I know it seems a little difficult but please give it a try.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 12, 2004 9:01:18 GMT -5
We have. Over and over again. That's not what I was asking. I was asking you to do it with that pic.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 12, 2004 7:06:38 GMT -5
Now that the eyes and nose match up, can you keep them the same size and match up the rest of the face and head?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 10, 2004 19:25:58 GMT -5
Then I guess 99.999999% of Beatles fan's eyes are shut. You got it. And I was once in that boat also, as were many of the PIDers on this board.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 10, 2004 13:18:03 GMT -5
He had more hair on the top of his head in those 2 pics. Definitely not in the pic on the right.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 9, 2004 13:08:56 GMT -5
Actually, those never changed. But in that fade, he has more hair on the top of his head in the LSD interview. The hair is the least thing on my mind in the LSD pic. The nose, jawline, eyes and head shape all look different.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 8, 2004 17:29:56 GMT -5
I think I just made that point there Darkhorse. Maybe the point is that if you don't want to believe that the real Paul McCartney is dead, your mind won't let you see the difference.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 8, 2004 16:56:34 GMT -5
I see two different people there Matchbox. Keep in mind, Lennon lost a lot of weight, more than Paul I would bet, especially in his face and he changed his hair style and there's no arguing he is the same man.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 8, 2004 15:11:24 GMT -5
How is it even within the realm of possibility that this is not the same person? I know. The two pics are from slightly different angles, so they will be deemed as useless. But notice the folds over the eyes, the creases under the eyes and the creases in the cheeks are all exactly the same. Also notice that the '70's Paul's left front tooth is shaped different because it was capped after the moped accident. I agree with Morph. Why don't the teeth match up in Matchbox's(or Kazu's) fade? Paul's are bigger. Formula to get Paul to match up with Faul in a fade=Make Paul's head bigger and the eyes will match up with Faul's. Everything else will be "close enough" and can be explained away.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 8, 2004 9:48:28 GMT -5
the hdn pic looks doctored to begin with. Yes and the crux of the whole argument!
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 13, 2007 20:11:39 GMT -5
Simply, JPM retains his Liverpool accent even while singing and Bill loses his, except for an occasional line or two.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 29, 2004 10:40:32 GMT -5
This may have been posted before but i thought I'd post it again. It's quite interesting. It seems like John is pleading with Faul/Bill and it wasn't working too well.
Dear Paul, Linda et all the wee McCartney's, Thanks for your letter. 1. We give YOU money for your bits of Apple. 2. We give you MORE money in the form of royalties which legally belong to Apple (I know we're Apple, but on the other hand we're not.). Maybe there's an answer there somewhere, but for the millionth time in these past few years I repeat, 'What about the TAX?' It's all very well, playing 'simple honest ole Paul' in Melody Maker but you know damn well we can't just sign a bit of paper.
You say, 'John won't do it.' I will if you indemnify us against the tax man! Anyway, you know that after we have OUR meeting, the f*cking lawyers will have to implement whatever we agree on, right?
If they have some form of agreement between THEM before WE meet, it might make it even easier. It's up to you, as we've said many times, we'll meet whenever you like. Just make up your mind! E.g. two weeks ago I asked you on the phone, 'Please let's meet without advisors, etc. and decide what we want,' and I emphasized especially Maclen [Lennon and McCartney's songwriting company] which is mainly our concern, but you refused, right?
You said under NO CONDITION would you sell to us if we didn't do what you wanted, you'd sue us again and that Ringo and George are going to break you John, etc. etc.
Now I was quite straight with you that day, and you tried to shoot me down with your emotional "logic." If YOU'RE not the aggressor (as you claim) who the hell took us to court and shat all over us in public?
As I've said before, Have you ever thought that you might POSSIBLY be wrong about something? Your conceit about us and Klein is incredible. You say you "made the mistake of trying to advise them against Klein and that pissed them off" and we secretly feel that you're right! Good God! You must know WE'RE right about Eastman.
One other little lie in your "It's only Paulie" MM bit: Let It Be was not the first bit of hype on a Beatle album. Remember Tony Barrow? And his wonderful writing on "Please Please Me" etc. etc. The early Beatle Xmas records!
And you gotta admit it was a 'new-phase' Beatle album, incidentally written in the style of the great Barrow himself! By the way, what happened to my idea of putting the parody of our first album cover on the Let It Be cover?
Also, we were intending to parody Barrow originally, so it was hype. But what is your LIFE article? Tony Barrow couldn't have done it better. (And your writing inside of the Wings album [Wild Life] isn't exactly the realist is it?) Anyway, enough of this petty bourgeois fun.
Another thing, whadya mean BIG THING in Toronto? It was completely spontaneous. They rang on the Friday, we flew there, and we played on Saturday. I was sick because I was stone pissed. Listen to the album-- with no rehearsal too. Come on Macka! Own up! We'd never played together before! Half a dozen live shows with no big fuss. In fact we've BEEN DOING what you've said the Beatles should do. Yoko and I have been doing it for three years! (I said it was daft for the Beatles to do it. I still think it's daft.) So go on and do it! Do it! Do it! E.g. Cambridge 1969, completely unadvertised! A very small hall. Lyceum Ballroom, 1969, no fuss, great show-- thirty piece rock band! "Live Jam" out soon! Filmore East, 1971, unannounced. Another good time had by all-- out soon!! We even played in the streets here in the Village (our spiritual home!?) with the great David Peel!! We were moved on by the cops even!! It's best just to DO IT.
I know you'll dig it, and they don't even expect the Beatles now anyway!
So you think 'Imagine' ain't political? It's 'Working Class Hero' with sugar on it for conservatives like yourself!! You obviously didn't dig the words. Imagine! You took 'How Do You Sleep' so literally (read my own review of the album in Crawdaddy.) Your politics are very similar to Mary Whitehouse's-- 'Saying nothing is as loud as saying something.'
No hard feelings to you either. I know basically we want the same, and as I said on the phone and in this letter, whenever you want to meet, all you have to do is call.
All you need is love Power to the people Free all prisoners Jail the judges Love and peace Get it on and rip 'em off
John Lennon
P.S. The bit that really puzzled us was asking to meet WITHOUT LINDA AND YOKO. I thought you'd have understood BY NOW that I'm JOHNANDYOKO.
P.P.S. Even your own lawyers know you can't "just sign a bit of paper." (or don't they tell you?)
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 30, 2005 19:44:18 GMT -5
Bill has accepted the role of Paul and is probably making the best of it. I'm sure he doesn't take life as seriously now.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 19, 2006 12:12:40 GMT -5
Since the idea of Paul only being replaced is a popular idea here lately, I thought I'd make a poll and see how everyone feels about this. Please vote what you think is the most likely scenario.
*Keep in mind for option #2, you are not voting that the Sir Paul of today is the same guy as the original James Paul McCartney. You are saying that Paul was replaced in 1966 for whatever reason and has been living behind the scenes and is alive today.*
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 6, 2006 17:08:47 GMT -5
curious wrote: Well, at least now we have a better idea when the Melody Music Maker photos were taken. I also agree that the man in those photos looks to be Paul. And who knows if Paul was present on the 9th or the 10th or the 11th. It's likely he just attended for one night. The Beatles were in high demand back then and had busy schedules.
|
|