|
Post by Doc on Mar 17, 2004 1:12:52 GMT -5
Actually, trying to decide if that is a left eye human male, or right eye human male. If it is the right eye, then it has one certain look to him. If it is the left eye, then I see the walrus thing. Can't quite decide.
Surely not autopsy stills superimposed?
No wonder she is having a bad dream.
The cow's "nose" doubles as a skull x-ray over Auntie's nose and mouth. She is crinkling her nose. No small wonder.
Whatever happened to this person, I pray that it was over with very very quickly.
Does anyone else see these images?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 17, 2004 1:00:45 GMT -5
Composites.
Not to mention the sunken face NEXT to Auntie, on HER right, we see it on the left of her. Its partly tucked away in a coat the looks like a headless torso, with a rope or cord hangman style around it.
There seems to be a hypodermic inserted into the "Cows" mandible, where the jaw down toward the neck might be.
The little coat to the left of her head, the bottons form eyes with impressionso in the shoulder part making nose and lips.
That big cow eye IS a human eye if you see it from another perspective.
That appears to be a human face with the mouth blown completely out. It looks like a...... .walrus. This is not pretty. There are two overlapping views of it. One perpective is in a normal perspective to us (up and down) , the other perspective makes the "cow" eye into a human eye. IN which case the face is perpendicular to our perspective. The rest of the cow head is really human head, in a ghastly state as we have heard, the mouth begins at THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE PICTURE we see. The dark part is the mouth/hole.
It suggests that someone's lower face was blown completely away, or removed somehow. The facial skin degraded and decomposed in the elements; the open, gaping mouth with the hardened leftover folds of flesh around the cheek and nose form the "walrus" mouth.
Walrus. They weren't kidding.
So, a hint of morbidity? This is like, not for kids.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 20, 2004 1:24:41 GMT -5
Indulge me a little...........seems like I've heard "berry" in a British accent often said run together, almost as one syllable. Almost like: "b'Rih." And, we tend to say cranberry without a break, not "cran...................berry.........." Just thinking out loud. I would expect to hear John say: "Cran'-b-rih" as a two syllable word, spoken in close order. Not: "Crah....................ber---rih................etc."
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jul 23, 2004 0:52:11 GMT -5
Is that CD set available?National Lampoon? If all this was done, and so much more-----we can never expect anything to change. I did not know about this set. Kinda staggering. But not half as staggerring as I will be after this Bailey's. Down the hatch. That was a lot of work, eyesbleed, thank you.Good thread!
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 8, 2004 21:47:10 GMT -5
Fine, then. Raise the blinds a little.
Venus is associated with the astrological sign of Taurus; Mars is linked to one but I dont recall it. Paul is/was a Gemini, that's, well, the twins. Don't rcall much else.
Was Tara driving in the accident? Were there other passengers? Were there other victims or another car? Did he hit a tree or something? If he hit a tree, then not noticing that the lights had changed doesn't really work, does it? I mean, you can cream a tree whether the light is red, green, or flashing amber. Traffic signals weren't made to defend the trees, poles, or other stationary objects.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 8, 2004 17:10:19 GMT -5
Unless John was mixing things up again and refering to somebody who DRANK a lot of Guinness beer....................just a thought.
Actually, what's the story on tara's doings etc. between Sept and Nov of 1966 prior to his demise? Could Tara have gone out earlier, and been "covered" for in like manner? Here's the wild card leap for today (and I know that this one most likely will go out in flames) but could there have been a VERY short term Tara double?
Which, sorry, would make him Tara Tara. Or, just Fara.
Also, yes. If James Paul and Tara had been such great friends, it seems curious that there is little apparent tribute to him by Paul, and notable, in fact "trumped" examples by Lennon and Starr each.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 7, 2004 23:00:09 GMT -5
Fascinating.
But whom applies to whom?
Who is having whom remembered?
An accidentally killing---very sad, very unfortunate.
Tell us more, please, sir, if you may.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 2, 2004 1:47:26 GMT -5
GETTING SO MUCH BETTER ALL THE TIME............
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 11, 2004 19:21:20 GMT -5
Well, I need to view "River Kwai" again, its been years, but they built the bridge as a deception, tight?
Maybe Kwai explains the why and how?
"Bill" may have been, in part, a "bridge" to lure?
Or scould Lennon's "I saw a film today, oh, boy", line refer to seeing the screening of his own recently completed film, "How I won the War?"
Gripweed? What a name.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 7, 2004 1:32:36 GMT -5
I thought to myself how to handle make the last post. What I wanted to say, and totally sincerely, in that post was that the idea you brought to the thread, James Paul saying it best, Money Can't Buy Me Love, was the strongest idea in the thread, that pretty much sews it up and answers to the question of why so much hard work went into it. You deserved , literally, the "last word" here, with the one word reply, "exactly", and I wanted to post this:
"There is nothing to add here. Yuu deserve the last word."
If I had done that, you wouldn't have HAD the last word. I was afraid THAT would have been sarcastic, and I really wanted to express that I was touched by the idea that the cover may have involved some sacrificial giving on the part of the makers.
I have a knack sometimes for coming across wrong---I am sorry to have made a sarcastic impression. Definitely not intended, FP.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 5, 2004 18:57:38 GMT -5
[img src="http://galeon.hispavista.com/akostuff/img/Good-Post[1].gif"]
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 5, 2004 6:46:17 GMT -5
Aye-aye. What's done for love is done in a way that forgets how long it takes, how much effort is required, and the opportunity itself IS the payment. Then, if this truly was a dedicatory cover, then renumeration was a low priority. In the face of sincere giving, greed evaporates. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 4, 2004 22:18:00 GMT -5
Yes, I recall that passage, somehow.
You imply: The more one knows about each of the "crowd" on the cover, the more one can cross reference what is known about them in order to derive inter-connections from their "attendence."
Each person in the cover must be worth a thousand words on their own. Quite an essay! A many chaptered book!
OK, so, did Karma direct the photo shoot? Or did some brilliant humans cleverly anticipate the "posing" needed to result in the mirror shots, etc. The drum head, the hidden walrus---so many other puzzle parts HAD to be placed just so in 3 dimensions in order to get the photographic result in 2 dimensions.
Astonishing. Whoever set the scene, so to speak, must not have been paid nearly enough.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 4, 2004 2:41:59 GMT -5
Well, and so if Arnold Schoenburg had been on the cover of SPLHCB John might have written a tone row like in the 12-tone sytem of composition, I suppose........
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 4, 2004 2:39:52 GMT -5
Thanks, Apollo. So, if I understand correctly, in one poetic technique, linear sequence is artistically redefined. The comfort zone of one's own personal syntax is too safe. Creatively stretching by writing beyond the usual flow helps; "open up" the presentation so that the result freshly engages the reader................?
Do I hear the buzzer?
I'll take literature for 50 please; "What is poetry.................."
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 1, 2004 23:52:26 GMT -5
[img src="http://galeon.hispavista.com/akostuff/img/Good-Post[1].gif"] Excellent class today, Professor.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 31, 2004 5:52:02 GMT -5
Theres a "dor" between us and the red faced man.
You'd have to get past these dorrs to see him.
These are special doors/ They are di-ana doors.
Diana's right are, covered by a stole, blocks our view.
Call PITA.
|
|
|
PHD
Nov 29, 2007 3:12:16 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Nov 29, 2007 3:12:16 GMT -5
Maybe he simply did what he indicated he was thinking about doing on that 1964 David Frost interview----he retired. He also said he might to write for others like a 'paperback writer'. Maybe he has collaborated with Bill all these years, fading in and out as he pleased, still very much alive today. If this is JPM, he is well past the age of 24. Thanks for that scenario, RL. I'll cling to that hope.
|
|
|
PHD
Nov 28, 2007 19:30:31 GMT -5
Post by Doc on Nov 28, 2007 19:30:31 GMT -5
PHD; Paul has a double what if... paul is still with us, and he just had a double all the time, and it didn't actually mattered which one they were going to use that would explain the minor differences between photo's of the later years we have been discussing It would also explain the late 1966 paul face, because of early surgical state With the fact that we have no body, no witness to come forth that has seen a body, complete and utter denial of PID from the entire Beatle entourage, your theory is perfectly sound. In fact it makes far more sense than any PID concoction. It is quite possible that that JPM grew tired of being in the limelight. The PID cover story/script was the ideal ticket out. Exactly. Maybe he simply did what he indicated he was thinking about doing on that 1964 David Frost interview----he retired. Paul Simply Retired. PSR. He's out fishing off a coastline somewhere and walking around in flip-flops and bermuda shorts. Hey, for someone, the limelight is just no fun.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Nov 13, 2004 22:59:53 GMT -5
As if there might be scads of subliminal imbedded tributes to James Paul. Maybe scads of people subliminally pick this up, subconsciously, but can't quite put there finger on it. There before you but invisible. Though somehow you know.......... A vague sense...of something...but what.......
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 16, 2004 23:35:24 GMT -5
Good find, JoJo.
Interesting that it says there are the 3 levels (at least0. The sky is the highest, the "Imbo" (could that mean "limbo"?) and the lowest, Earth.
The Pepper cover has the painted blue backing flat, the crowd is on the bleachers (is this "Imbo"?) and the dirt garden in front is the Earth. Sky, Earth, limbo.
And momentos of things they used or help dear in life. A bass guitar, a soccer trophy. Di JP play soccer? (football)
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 16, 2004 2:27:09 GMT -5
www.uv.mx/popularte/ingles/scriptphplen.php?&sid=368&len=InRead near end of article, especially where the paragraph starts : "Since Mexicans believe the dead return once a year." Talks about having a day of the dea, aparty for the dead once a year. Many custims and traditions are listed, including, leaving things around that the deceased had really liked, included toys, games, etc, even models of cars and trucks............. That candle on Sgt. Peppers is a Mexican Candlestick. And, then, there is the connection to Candle Stick Park. Did Paul fly home with the rest of the Beatles after that concert, or did he stay in the states and fly to Denver and points beyond with Mal, Brian, and others on a charter plane? DId they then go to Spain and Africa? If so, who was that that is photographed with Tom Jones and Ringo and Dusty at the Melody Maker Awards on Sept 12?. Were those awards held in London? How could he be in Denver and London at the same time? Did he go to London and then fly back to Denver later? Did Paul ever make it back from America? I mean, in between MMA and the safari? Was there press coverage of the Beatles arriving back in London after Candlestick Park? Well, it was the beginning of the jet set age. I guess I'd be restless after a strict tour schedule, too.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Dec 30, 2005 23:03:18 GMT -5
Well, I was only referring to that one pic of Bill, probably in the 1970's with a similar hairstyle, and the shading of the pic resembled Ricky. Otherwise no. Bill does have an identity crisis. It's no wonder, pretending to be someone he's not, something has to erode on the inside of a man who's been an imposter. Now I don't agree with everything that has been revealed about Bill. Such as Bill was Neil, or Neil is Bill, or that he was Paul Raymond, Adrian Sheppard, Geoffrey so and so, and Vivian. If you look at the recent 60 IF document, it now has Neil as Bill and Don Knotts as Frian. With all of that nonsense, I believe someone is trying to throw us off by throwing some turds at us that's supposed to be replacements Neil and Don Knotts. And why would Bill still dress up like Vivian Stamshell until 1995? Doesn't he have enough on his plate being Sir Paul? Good points, yes, so many red herrings being thrown at us like a crate full of week old after-market fish. But one thing regarding "doing" Vivian in 1995. Maybe becoming Viv was a lot of fun...............and Viv woudn't have minded. 9'll getcha' 10 they traded make-up tips, Viv and Bill.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Dec 30, 2005 12:12:47 GMT -5
That is all very interesting. Beatlies, thanks for the link. I agree that it's very suspicious that he totally ignores the PID/PWR controversy. We could e-mail them and suggest they include a consice paragraph about.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 21, 2004 1:45:22 GMT -5
Well, my my we are a lively crewe tonight! Well, take a business crad and cover up the woman from where her "hair" starts, all the top of the picture. What's left is clearly a wacky cartoon face with a big nose and pursed lips. The eye area might just be representing sunglasses , So it says, what you think you see may be something else---disguised cleverly----like wandering eyes in a still painting--the man behind the wall (where's the secret door) who peeps through hard to detect eye holes in the Mona Lisa copy-----spy comedy. Ah, a new series format for TV, a "spy-com." Well we had "Get Smart", I guess..... so they need to bring it back!..............Don Adams is still alive. Is Barbara Feldon? Somebody call CBS and lets get a move on that! ;D
|
|