|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 3, 2009 12:51:29 GMT -5
You say that in such an unqualified, matter of fact manner. The soul needs two parents; says who??? iameye said: "who's soul? who's soul would be so desirable?"I've already answered this question. The prophets seem to be telling us that it's Crowley's (who was possibly the embodiment of Lucifer) soul. Yes in my most "unqualified, matter of fact manner" I say so. Crowley even says so. But Crowley never could be the embodiment of "Lucifer" , nor do I see any prophets say this, so I suggest you reread what he actually wrote. I mean that in the most nicest, sincere way. Because it's all there, in B & W. Incidentally, by "unqualified", I meant that you weren't qualifying your statement with a phrase such as "in my opinion", NOT that you are not qualified to speak on the topic. And I've read lots of Crowley. Can you tell/show me where he says what you claim he says, in B & W? Book, chapter, page? Link? Oh, and please explain why you posted the jelly fish crop circle in this thread, in response to my post.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 3, 2009 10:48:35 GMT -5
iameye said: "Last time I checked, Penny, men can't give birth...."But I'm not talking about birth in terms of a baby coming from a woman's uterus. That's just the symbolism. I'm talking about rebirth in the form of the installation of a soul. iameye said: "Perhaps Macca studied Crowley, but I doubt he is or would even want to be Crowley."I'm not interested in trying to divine the wants or motivations of a man I've never met. I'm just trying to follow the clues that the modern day prophets have left for us. I could EASILY be wrong, but this is my shot and I'm taking it. the soul needs two parents, important symbolism generally white washed. I'm talking about rebirth in the form of the installation of a soul.
who's soul? who's soul would be so desirable? iameye said: "the soul needs two parents, important symbolism generally white washed."You say that in such an unqualified, matter of fact manner. The soul needs two parents; says who??? iameye said: "who's soul? who's soul would be so desirable?"I've already answered this question. The prophets seem to be telling us that it's Crowley's (who was possibly the embodiment of Lucifer) soul.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 3, 2009 10:30:57 GMT -5
PL, red is not really your color! "I disagree, iameye. I think that the natural state of the universe involves the recycling of souls. I also think that the universe runs on a basic set of rules, involving numbers, mathematics, geometry, and a fundamental concept of polarity. I further believe that some people have figured out how to manipulate these rules, and that this is what we call magick.
It was through this magick that Faul was reborn as Crowley. After all, he IS the son of the magickian, no?" Last time I checked, Penny, men can't give birth....I'm not saying the" rules" can't be interpreted or even used beneficially to some degree by those who look into these matters, or/if that reincarnation exists or not. I was just saying that practitioners of the "occult" ways are generally unaware of how to actually use this information, and things basically slip into the deep end of profound ignorance and misunderstanding. It's not magic(K) at any point and more of a crutch to "do as thou wilt" or worse, used to propel a certain agenda, justifying action though "Magik." Perhaps Macca studied Crowley, but I doubt he is or would even want to be Crowley. Crowley, for all his outrageous pomp and circumstance, boils down to he just being a doorway to something else - which is the part of the story most people just don't get. iameye said: "Last time I checked, Penny, men can't give birth...."But I'm not talking about birth in terms of a baby coming from a woman's uterus. That's just the symbolism. I'm talking about rebirth in the form of the installation of a soul. iameye said: "Perhaps Macca studied Crowley, but I doubt he is or would even want to be Crowley."I'm not interested in trying to divine the wants or motivations of a man I've never met. I'm just trying to follow the clues that the modern day prophets have left for us. I could EASILY be wrong, but this is my shot and I'm taking it.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 3, 2009 9:52:45 GMT -5
I don't think anyone was "sacrificed" in any of these water scenarios, McCartney, Crowley, Anger, Brittany etc... in any "real" way because it is impossible to achieve such a thing. Per Se. And certainly Crowley, as much as his ego would have liked it, was NOT the Beast or Lucifer. What he did try to accomplish, though, was to force events through less than savory "practice" . In his mind, I guess he felt free from any remorse for his choices, citing "free will" for the cause, or 911 mindset, acting as catalyst.
Polanski, is another water-bearer in several films ( plus a real life Jacuzzi scene)
Nóz w wodzie/Knife in the Water (1962 Poland 94 mins) At the same time, Polanski litters these exterior scenes with wide shots that emphasis the ominous and oppressive sense of isolation that one inevitably feels in the middle of a vast body of water, encouraging an uneasy tension between these and the claustrophobic close-ups. This sense of isolation is heightened by the increasingly noticeable absence of other people in the picture
So all this water and rebirth symbolism takes place though a medium - water. As in, hands across.
" But the kettle's on the boil And we're so eas'ly called away."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ma8OhzFdIA
iameye said: "I don't think anyone was "sacrificed" in any of these water scenarios, McCartney, Crowley, Anger, Brittany etc... in any "real" way because it is impossible to achieve such a thing."I disagree, iameye. I think that the natural state of the universe involves the recycling of souls. I also think that the universe runs on a basic set of rules, involving numbers, mathematics, geometry, and a fundamental concept of polarity. I further believe that some people have figured out how to manipulate these rules, and that this is what we call magick. It was through this magick that Faul was reborn as Crowley. After all, he IS the son of the magickian, no? And while I'm at it and have a bit of time, I'll throw out another Rosemary's Baby connection. Near the end of the film when the very pregnant Rosemary is in the waiting room of her obstetrician, she's reading the famous Is God Dead? edition of Time Magazine, from April 8, 1966. The title story is called Toward a Hidden God, and is 11 pages long, natch. On page 11, there's this very interesting obituary for god: "ATLANTA, Ga., Nov. 9—God, creator of the universe, principal deity of the world's Jews, ultimate reality of Christians, and most eminent of all divinities, died late yesterday during major surgery undertaken to correct a massive diminishing influence. "Reaction from the world's great and from the man in the street was uniformly incredulous . . ." www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,835309-11,00.html I ONE IX HE<>DIE or possibly 11/9 ( Nov. 9) he die. Since Rosemary is carrying Lucifer's spawn while she's reading this magazine, in a movie that has all of the other connections that I pointed out earlier, this is another link between Rosemary's Baby, Sgt. Pepper, and Lucifer reborn.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 3, 2009 8:11:17 GMT -5
from wikipedia:"Romany is an album by The Hollies, the first not to feature distinctive, tenor-range lead singer Allan Clarke, who had left to try a solo career and was replaced by a Swedish singer with lower vocal register, Mikael Rickfors---prompting a somewhat radical reshaping of their trademark vocal harmony style. It was also the first Hollies album to feature only one song written or co-written by lead guitarist Tony Hicks, a member of the band's two in-house songwriting teams, Clarke-Hicks-Nash and Clarke-Hicks-Sylvester. Hicks was the only member of those teams to contribute a song to the album; Rickfors was the only other band member to contribute an original composition to it. The U.S. Epic version which reached #84 on the U.S album charts, omits the track "Lizzy and the Rainman, and has a slightly altered side one track order." ------------------------ The song 'Romany' on that album includes these lyrics: Take me home Sailing on with Romany To and fro on a icy morning Feeling calm to have an old friend 'round Feeling warm to see the wind blow down Take me home where saints and children laughing Tell the Dutchman ships are passing Feeling safe to reach the harbor sound Feeling warm to see the wind blow down Take me home Leave the galley sailors talking Leave the bridge and captain's walking Feeling naked on the covered ground Feeling warm to see the wind blow down The wind blowed down in the moonless light the sea was dark the breeze was light Everyone's thoughts were their own Caught by the ocean thief The bow hit on a coral reef Romany sank like a stone -------------------------- There was a British radio broadcaster known as "Romany". The album cover suggests to me it hearkens to this individual. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bramwell_Evens"George Bramwell Evens The Rev. George Bramwell Evens (1884- November 20, 1943) was, under the pseudonym Romany (and sometimes The Tramp), a British radio broadcaster and writer on countryside and natural history matters - quite possibly the first to broadcast on such issues. He was also a Minister of the Methodist Church. Biography His mother was a true Romani, born in a caravan (or 'vardo' in Romani). He is most famous for his Out With Romany programmes on the BBC's Children's Hour, describing travels in his own vardo, with Comma the horse, his spaniel Raq and his young friends Muriel and Doris. Although the programmes were all pre-scripted and performed entirely in the studio, the impression given was of Romany and his friends going for a walk in the countryside and spontaneously discussing the plants and animals they came across." -------------------------------- I think John Lennon may have been alluding to this show when he said something about "Doris gets her oats" on the 'Let It Be' album. But again, that may suggest that the 'friend of Romany' in the song met his death in a boating accident. And was Paul. Or something. Certainly since Romany was into nature, then his children radio audience could have been considered 'Mother Nature's sons and daughters'. Is it possible that Paul became a child-like "mother nature's son" who would have listened to the show, after becoming child-like after suffering a lightning strike to the head? I am still troubled by the shattered child's face in the mountain montage on the alternate White Album cover: Dear Prudence, won't you come out and play ... like a little child. Or perhaps as the Pink Floyd words in "Signs of Life" suggested, the person became like a child after his plane crashed.... Not a pleasant thought. Maybe what Stevie Nicks was talking about here: And if I was a child, and the child was enough, Enough for me to love, enough to love. She is dancing away from me now. She was just a wish.... I don't think anyone mentioned the Graham Nash connection between The Hollies and Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young, so I'm mentioning it. American Dream, yo. Oh, and they were signed to Parlaphone, and recorded at...... Wait for it......... Abbey Road. Of course.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 2, 2009 15:44:44 GMT -5
Apollo Crowley Vermouth gives P(D)ennny 4 gold stars. ****Even so, P(D)enny, I'd like to see you substantiate this statement a little bit more: "There are lots of clues pointing to McCartney selling his soul in order to facilitate the birth of Lucifer's spawn." I am not sure that I would agree with it. invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Clues&action=display&thread=5635Here's a bit more, B: Below is another image from Kenneth Anger's LUCIFER RISING, compared with a shot of Paul from the White Album poster. If we assume that Anger was implying that SOMEONE was sacrificed and was reborn as Lucifer, then it's certainly NOT a stretch to carry it one step further to substitute Crowley (the Beast) for Lucifer, so that we have: Paul sacrificed, and Faul begotten as Lucifer (Crowley), or the risen son of Lucifer (Crowley). In the film, the sacrifice seems to begin in a bathtub: Here's Paul from the White Album poster: Here we have Eight Arms To Hold You, from Lucifer Rising: Compared to Eight Arms To Hold You, from the SACRIFICE scene in HELP!: And incidentally, Anger worked with Bobby Beausoleil, who was a member of the Manson family. And speaking of Lucifer... "Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight" Lyrics "Nothing too much just out of sight You say you love me This is true The best thing to do Is to lie down beside me I said I love you Nothing too much just out of sight
I said I love you I thought you knew The last thing to do was to try to betray me The NEW MORNING LIGHTI'll never forget it, and that's just out of sight"The remainder is pretty indecipherable. Until the spoken outro where he rather demonically says: "The last thing to do was to try to betray me"So anyway, you all know the drill by now, but here's a refresher: Venus = the morning star = Lucifer = NEW MORNING LIGHT and apparently THAT'S JUST OUT OF SIGHT A'hem. There's more, but I need to dig through my Mac at home to find it.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 2, 2009 12:05:04 GMT -5
Geoff Emerick was on the Mark and Brian radio show this morning talking about the Beatles and his new book "Here, There and Everywhere: my life recording the music of the Beatles". i was wondering if anyone else heard this? thoughts? i was able to listen to a bit of it while driving this morning and i was curious if he let anything slip or contradicted himself or someone else.... ;D as, of course, he'd be one to know the truth of Faul -PaulA That's a relatively old book, peacec. I believe it came out in 2006. I don't recall any PID/PWR bombshells, but he did have some nasty stuff to say about George's musicianship. It's a great book for people who've always wondered about stuff like how'd they get that bass sound on Paperback Writer. There's also some interesting stories about the recording of Band On the Run. You can probably get a used paperback copy for next to nothing at Amazon...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 2, 2009 8:07:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 1, 2009 22:02:54 GMT -5
Pardon the intrusion...Apollo often, if not always, made reference to the "Rosetta Stone" of clues which is Sgt. Pepper. Both in the cover art, as well as music and lyrics. The Beatles, in the works that followed, both as a band, and later on their own as solo artist, pointed a finger back at "Pepper". Lets start at the beginning, and work our way forward. Lets see if there is anything we missed. A good place to start is in a 1984 McCartney interview that is quite telling. Pay attention to the words..."It was an idea I had, I think when I was flying from L.A. to somewhere. I thought it would be nice to lose our identities, to submerge ourselves in the persona of a fake group. We would make up all the culture around it and collect all our heroes in one place. So I thought a stupid-sounding name for a Dr. Hook's Medicine Show and Traveling Circus kind of thing would be 'Sgt. Pepper's Loneley Hearts Club Band'. Just a word game, really." The "game " begins... POV We would make up all the culture around it and collect all our heroes in one place. So I thought a stupid-sounding name for a Dr. Hook's Medicine Show and Traveling Circus kind of thing would be 'Sgt. Pepper's Loneley Hearts Club Band'. Just a word game, really." The "game " begins... POV
pov what do you mean by " FOLLOW MR.APOLLO" ? I took this to be another clue to look to Pepper for the answer, and when I do that, I always come back to Rosemary's Baby, and the Devil's Pepper that Minnie feeds to Rosemary in order to keep her sick and to induce the hallucinatory state that allowed Guy to consumate the devil's "realationship" with her to bring about Lucifer's spawn. It was 20 years ago today Sgt. Pepper taught the band to play Which brings us to Crowley, who died 20 years prior to the release of Pepper, and who called himself the Beast 666, and is on the cover of Pepper, yadda, yadda, yadda. Mia ( Pharaoh) Farrow played Rosemary, and was with the Beatles in India. Crowley wrote The Book of the Law in a fit of automatic writing after visiting the Egyptian pyramids, at the behest of a spirit called Aiwas ( i Was you). Rosemary's Baby was directed by Polanski, whose wife was Sharon Tate, who was pregnant when she was murdered by the Manson family in Doris Day's old house. Lennon was quoted as saying that the Beatles stayed "at Doris Day's house (Terry Melcher was her son, who produced Manson's music), so it seems more than possible that the Beatles could have met Manson. The Tate murder scene had Helter Skelter and Piggies written on the wall in blood. A door at the Spahn Ranch had 1 2 3 4 5 6 7, All good children go to Heaven written on it, and was dicovered BEFORE the release of Abbey Road.Manson claimed that he was inspired by the song Helter Skelter. Rosemary's Baby was shot in the Dakota.Lennon lived in, and was shot in front of the Dakota. Rosemary's Baby was about an artist who sold his soul in order to facilitate the birth of Lucifer's spawn. There are lots of clues pointing to McCartney selling his soul in order to facilitate the birth of Lucifer's spawn. Kenneth Anger's Lucifer Rising has a few of these clues. I could go on, but you get the picture, and I'm certain that most of you are already familiar with all or at least most of this. This is why I haven't posted much recently. In my mind, THIS is mostly what we were supposed to have figured out, and we DID figure it out. And since there's nobody to say "great work - you've figured it out!", I'm afraid that we're destined to keep coming back to the same old photo comparisons, and name-calling between competing forum supporters, and the like. So anyway. This is what I think POV was telling us, iameye... ;D
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 31, 2009 9:56:39 GMT -5
Hmm? Somewhere along the line, there was a topic thread that tossed around the idea of William 'Junior' Campbell of the band Marmalade as having some connection to this whole scene. I don't remember who threw that idea out there. I remembered the album cover that was posted in that discussion thread. It was my thread, Sky. Here it is: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4878&page=1
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 30, 2009 9:37:09 GMT -5
Thanks for caring guys... it means a lot. Jo, I like your method of choice. lol And you know, what you said makes sense in that how observant are most of us a lot of the time? Personally, I always found that I was never observant enough to satisfy myself, and yet, I have to wonder how much the average person misses if they're not looking for something... Like the phony preachers, and joggers... how many others noticed the things I did? Who else is standing there observing the actions of passers-by? I doubt it would register with most, and even if it did, I don't think they'd question it. After going through this, I have even less trouble believing that multitudes can be in on something and it remains a secret. Because really, the only way I became aware of it is by big mouths and hollow walls. If the building was soundproof, I might never have known And yeah, as much as it's intimidating, I do have to laugh at the many bungled scenarios... amateurs. It's pretty hard to spy on someone when they know about it. lmao. Web cam... do tell. And, if anyone has info on what kind of "monitor" she could have planted in my apartment, I'd appreciate that as well. Is that the James Bond theme I hear? lol Ok, now, the slickest thing I've seen yet is a small cable that attaches to your regular keyboard cable, that attaches to the computer, that is a keylogger in hardware form. Its manufacturer states that most people don't check behind their computers for months at a time... hm. Well, I suppose I could have dusted back there a little more often, but I did have to vacuum the fan quite frequently for dog hair. Quick! Everyone check. rofl. Power strips as audio listening devices. Yikes. See, now there's something I wouldn't notice. These people that perform this snoop work must be bored out of their minds. I mean, no offense, in general with everyone, though I am sure your life is full and rewarding, Like, here'a sample journal: "Well, the target exited her house at 8:13AM for apparently work, where she drove across town to the Acme Enterprise Office Tower. She parked her car on the usual floor, took the #5 elevator to the 41st floor, got off, and had some coffee. Agent #4 and I mooned her thru the glass in the hallway. She pretended not to notice. SHe then went to her cubicle, #7, in the the accounting area where she drank coffee and did her case load for 3.76 hours. She then took a break for 4.7 minutes, got a donut, a Coke, and resumed working until lunch, when she went to the cafeteria on the 38th floor. She saw us following her but pretended not to notice. We tracked her to cafe table 11 where she had beef stroganoff and an apple. And a stick of gum, which she threw in the trash. We retrieved the gum and it is now at Exam Central being tested to see if her DNA has changed in any way since last week. ......... before going to bed, she fed her Cat, Daisy, and called her sister in Schenectady/ They talk for 7.98 minutes about Aunt Zelda's perscription Tylenol and how Dr. Schlattinger isn't taking good enough care of her since his stroke. They plan to change her mom's M.D. in July. Shortly thereafter, she burped not once but twice, said the catechism, fell asleep listening to the radio on "LoveSongs" radio. and snored for about 1/7 of the 6.89 hours she slept. She was awakened early by the weekly dempster dumpsterm vtimdvoitmdsoipmv p[sdmvdjfkgvn dgjnvWReive49860885nv e5yv noeiv snore.............................. BTW, yep Schlattinger really fallen off. I'd go with Dr. Moody. Can you write a couple of chapters of this, Doc? I'm dying to find out what happens next! ;D
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 29, 2009 13:10:23 GMT -5
How original P(D)enny La(i)ne (look up a couple spaces)! Wild Life - INXS [/quote] Sorry Jai! I've been a very lazy poster the past few months... Life and How to Live It_R.E.M.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 29, 2009 9:43:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 28, 2009 8:48:49 GMT -5
What Is Life - George Harrison All My Life_ECHO & THE BUNNYMEN
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 27, 2009 8:27:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 27, 2009 8:20:09 GMT -5
I found somewhere, also, that Smith is one of the most common names that Romani people assumed in England and Germany. Well, it's a common name, but it is also a translation of their own common version of it, well I guess that follows form the idea of there being so many tinsmith's, etc, but, well.... My mother's maiden name was Smith....... and I have hit a major dead end in the genealogy..... Smith is incredibly common, you are correct. This is why The Smiths were named The Smiths. Because it's the most common English name.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 25, 2009 16:40:50 GMT -5
Forget about the face photos. It's too easy to argue the ticky tack stuff, and also too easy for the details to have been shopped. I think that the comparison photos showing that there was a least one substitute for Paul begin and end right here. 1st pic is squashed. If it's been squashed, it wasn't by me. But even if it has been squashed, it would effect both Paul and Ringo in the same way. In the photo on the left, Ringo's eyes are level with the space between Paul's nose and Paul's eyes. In the color photo, Ringo's eyes are level with Paul's MOUTH. This discrepancy isn't accounted for by "squashing" (and again, I didn't squash anything). Either the Paul in the color photo is a larger man, or the Ringo is smaller.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 25, 2009 13:19:02 GMT -5
the Adam's Apple? Forget about the face photos. It's too easy to argue the ticky tack stuff, and also too easy for the details to have been shopped. I think that the comparison photos showing that there was a least one substitute for Paul begin and end right here.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 25, 2009 12:46:05 GMT -5
The vocals are double tracked - and I don't think they're flanged. I use to think it was Paul with John beside him. But listening again, I think it's Paul layered over Paul. Basic double track. I'm pretty sure that the Here, There, and Everywhere vocal used varispeed. I'm 98% certain that it's JPM, double tracked and pitched up, but if it's anyone but JPM, I'd believe it was George before John...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 25, 2009 12:14:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 21, 2009 10:58:26 GMT -5
Wow. Just........WOW. www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21obama.html?_r=2WASHINGTON — President Obama told human rights advocates at the White House on Wednesday that he was mulling the need for a “preventive detention” system that would establish a legal basis for the United States to incarcerate terrorism suspects who are deemed a threat to national security but cannot be tried, two participants in the private session said.The discussion, in a 90-minute meeting in the Cabinet Room that included Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and other top administration officials, came on the eve of a much-anticipated speech Mr. Obama is to give Thursday on a number of thorny national security matters, including his promise to close the detention center at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Human rights advocates are growing deeply uneasy with Mr. Obama’s stance on these issues, especially his recent move to block the release of photographs showing abuse of detainees, and his announcement that he is willing to try terrorism suspects in military commissions — a concept he criticized bitterly as a presidential candidate. The two participants, outsiders who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the session was intended to be off the record, said they left the meeting dismayed. They said Mr. Obama told them he was thinking about “the long game” — how to establish a legal system that would endure for future presidents. He raised the issue of preventive detention himself, but made clear that he had not made a decision on it. Several senior White House officials did not respond to requests for comment on the outsiders’ accounts. “ He was almost ruminating over the need for statutory change to the laws so that we can deal with individuals who we can’t charge and detain,” one participant said. “We’ve known this is on the horizon for many years, but we were able to hold it off with George Bush. The idea that we might find ourselves fighting with the Obama administration over these powers is really stunning.” The other participant said Mr. Obama did not seem to be thinking about preventive detention for terrorism suspects now held at Guantánamo Bay, but rather for those captured in the future, in settings other than a legitimate battlefield like Afghanistan. “The issue is,” the participant said, “What are the options left open to a future president?” Mr. Obama did not specify how he intended to deal with Guantánamo detainees who posed a threat and could not be tried, nor did he share the contents of Thursday’s speech, the participants said. He will deliver the speech at a site laden with symbolism — the National Archives, home to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Across town, his biggest Republican critic, former Vice President Dick Cheney, will deliver a speech at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Cheney and other hawkish critics have sought to portray Mr. Obama as weak on terror, and their argument seems to be catching on with the public. On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, in a clear rebuke to the White House, blocked the $80 million Mr. Obama had requested in financing to close the Guantánamo prison. The lawmakers say they want a detailed plan before releasing the money; there is deep opposition on Capitol Hill to housing terrorism suspects inside the United States. “He needs to convince people that he’s got a game plan that will protect us as well as be fair to the detainees,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, who agrees with Mr. Obama that the prison should be closed. “If he can do that, then we’re back on track. But if he doesn’t make that case, then we’ve lost control of this debate.” But Mr. Obama will not use the speech to provide the details lawmakers want. “What it’s not going to be is a prescriptive speech,” said David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s senior adviser. “The president wants to take some time and put this whole issue in perspective to identify what the challenges are and how he will approach dealing with them.”
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 18, 2009 9:55:31 GMT -5
For my 666th post, I figured I'd throw The Beast a bone. In My Time of Dying, by Led Zeppelin
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 16, 2009 11:53:03 GMT -5
Oh boy GLP can really get anyone riled up. I'd advise stay away, but I read it all the time.. Guess you can't look away from a train wreck. I'm probably gonna go there now, lol. What is GLP? Sounds tempting! :-) GLP = Godlike Productions. You've been warned... ;D
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 16, 2009 10:01:42 GMT -5
On the cover of time, is that a picture of Paul McCartney on Faul's right shoulder ( right in front of George's mouth)? Ayup. Great catch, Jai!
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on May 14, 2009 11:54:21 GMT -5
|
|