|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 21:21:39 GMT -5
P(D)enny La(i)ne wrote: " If an active pineal gland really does provide illumination, then it's safe to say that the-powers-that-be would go to great lengths to keep it a secret." Or to muck it up with flouride, ritalin, prozac, themarisol, HD TV signals; you name it. 'They' prefer to keep us 'Third Eye Blind', lest we see them for what/who they are, eye would say. Here's a blast from the past from Iameye, deadicated to P(D)enny La(i)ne from brother Ronnie. - K.C. Case' em [/color] *www.amazon.com/Magic-Mushrooms-Religion-Alchemy-Heinrich/dp/customer-reviews/0892819979 "Here's an example of a series of connections, from mushroom natural history, to known lore, to speculation, to "seeing is believing": the mushroom first emerges as a white "egg" shape, then grows to maturity, the cap eventually inverting so that its margins are higher than its center. If one slices across the cap, the view explosed is like that of uplifted wings of a white bird. Birds and eggs are of course an association pair, and there are reports of users of the mushroom giving it bird nicknames. In addition to this appearance of wings, there is the association of the psychoactive mushroom with visionary flight. And so Heinrich and others suggest that where we see winged angels or descending doves in words or pictures in mythology, we may be seeing psychoactive mushroom referents. It sounds like perhaps a stretch. But then we open another book co-authored by Heinrich, "The Apples of Apollo" and find photographs of ancient Greek vase paintings of the winged Gorgon Medusa (whose blood was medicinal), and of Hyakinthos riding to Paradise on the back of a swan, and quite clearly the depicted wings bear much more resemblance to sliced mushroom caps than to the pattern of feathers on bird wings, which the artists were fully capable of rendering, had that been their intention. It appears obvious that these vase painters were communicating to an initiated audience traditions into which they were themselves initiated. If the mapping of mushroom lore onto religious symbolism is simply a "confusion" created by drug-addled minds, it appears that this "confusion" has existed a long time and surfaces again and again where we have glimpses into esoteric traditions which may have been carried on continuously for thousands of years."------------------------------------- * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronnie_Lane"During the recording of Rough Mix, Lane was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (his mother had also suffered from the disease). Nonetheless, he toured, wrote, and recorded (with Eric Clapton, among many others) and managed to release yet another album, See Me, which features several songs written by Lane and Clapton. Around this time Lane travelled the highways and byways of England and lived a 'passing show' modern nomadic life in full Gypsy Traveller costume and accommodation. Playing a lot of acoustic music in the open air for his adopted extended family, the sheep, the early morning and the rolling hillsides, in retrospect it could be said that he became the first New Age traveller/performer of the British Isles, at least a decade before the term was commonly used." [/quote] B said:
"the mushroom first emerges as a white egg shape"Like this? Wings, Back To the Egg: Amanita as the Grail:
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 18:51:32 GMT -5
So as I wondered above, were/are the Beatles and Paul/Bill just trying to subtly steer us towards the enlightenment that comes from realizing the power of the 3rd eye? If an active pineal gland really does provide illumination, then it's safe to say that the-powers-that-be would go to great lengths to keep it a secret. Especially, if Wasson and Allegro were correct in their assessment that Amanita Muscaria (magic mushrooms) are the true Tree of Knowledge. www.egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htmWinged Caduceus: Wings: More Wings: 3rd Eye of Horus: Issy Bonn providing a symbolic Crown Chakra: Winged Caduceus and the SEVEN levels of Chakra: The secret of the Universe: A 3rd eye Winged Beetle:
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 16:08:48 GMT -5
Bill uses the Eye of Horus as his logo. The Eye of Horus is really just the 3rd eye, or the SEVENTH Chakra, or the CROWN Chakra. And we all know by now that there are SEVEN levels. Here, the 3rd eye seems to be represented by a WINGED BEETLE. Which connects us back to Crowley: So, it seems reasonable to think that Issy Bonn's hand is really just symbolizing the 3rd eye, or the CROWN Chakra, like an Indian Chief's head dress. Could this all just be about spiritual awakening/rebirth through the use of psychedlics? Could it really be THAT simple? Maybe Carman is (sort of) on the right path. Maybe they were just trying to steer us towards the real answers that are hidden to those who only see with two of their three eyes. They WERE pretty blatant about it a lot of the time: "They don't know-they can't see-are you one of them? When you've seen beyond yourself-then you may find, peace of mind, Is waiting there- And the time will come when you see we're all one, and life flows on within you and without you" What if THAT (drug use opening the 3rd eye) is THE BIG SECRET that allows the elite to control the world? And maybe THAT is why they had to be controlled/stopped? More to come...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 14:50:23 GMT -5
Also, Diana Dors dress, a lovely gold lamé, isn't really a dress at all. It looks like one; it's really an OWL. That was sweet Doc. I love it. The drum is not a drum. It is a golf ball on a tee.-j A golf ball on a tee? Or maybe it represents the Amanita Muscaria? "Mushrooms were also seen as 'winged' creatures, or crowned by a cloudy cap or 'halo', each carrying a 'message' from God, the very definition of an 'Angel'. Some mushrooms were 'good' or nutritious, some were 'evil' or poisonous, but amanita muscaria was considered 'blessed' and capable of bestowing health, strength, inspiration and the power of prognostication.
Ingestion of the amanita muscaria can revive the deathly ill and enables people to perform unusual feats of strength. The Gnostics used the mushroom to access 'gnosis' or 'sacred knowledge' and become privy to seeing the 'Kingdom at hand.'
The experience can also result in a very deep sleep, giving the appearance that the partaker has died, only to be 'resurrected' as the effect wears off." www.iamshaman.com/amanita/jesus.htm"The great pioneering researcher in the field of ethnobotany and entheogenic plants, Gordon Wasson, was the first to suggest that the Vedic soma was the mushroom Amanita muscaria. In the 1970s John Allegro (in The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross) claimed to show that early Christianity arose from the suppression of a secret practice of using Amanita muscaria for spiritual purposes (and that all statements about "Jesus" were actually disguised statements about the mushroom).
Contemporary researchers, in particular, Carl Ruck, Blaise Daniel Staples and Clark Heinrich, have confirmed Wasson's research and expanded upon it, providing evidence that this mushroom has played an important role not only in Indian religions but also in Judaism and Christianity (thus supporting John Allegro's findings) and in the alchemical tradition." www.serendipity.li/trypt.html
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 11:55:37 GMT -5
A Pinch of Vermouth wrote: " Apollo often, if not always, made reference to the "Rosetta Stone" of clues which is Sgt. Pepper.... Lets see if there is anything we missed." Jarvitonics discovered this, but I think it deserves more attention. You have Crowley, hidden, behind Shirley Temple and Diana Dors. Crowley, then, is hidden behind the "Temple - Dors" (temple doors). So you have Crowley - "the Beast" - hidden behind the temple doors, or, put another way: The Beast is in[/b] the temple. What is the relevance of that? It is a representation of a Biblical quote from Jesus, where he is talking to his disciples, who have asked him when the "end of the world" is going to be. He tells them: "...Ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars... there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes..." and then he says, "When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place... Then let them which be in Judaea (Jerusalem) flee into the mountains" Now "the abomination of desolation" is the defiling of the temple, and historically it occurred when Antiochus Epiphenes splattered pig's blood around the altar of the temple. Pigs were considered 'unclean' animals by the Jews, so that act was an act that would make the temple 'desolate' (empty) because no Jew would go in after that. In modern times it would be like spreading crap on the altar at a church. And by the same token, having Crowley ("the Beast") hiding in the temple would be like having a pig in the temple, or having the devil in a church, which would make it desolate. But of course, if the devil was hidden, people wouldn't know he was there. The modern equivalent of the devil hiding in the temple is basically the "New World Order" reptillian tyrants hiding in "the temple" of democratic republics. And if you have seen the cover of Pepper, you have seen, or been shown symbollicly, the abomination of desolation hiding in the temple, where it ought not to be, heralding, therefore, THE END of the age (not the end of the world really) of hidden tyrants, and the sign that Jesus said would herald the coming (soon thereafter) of the new "age" when his kingdom would be established, or, at the very least, the age when reptillian entities 'hidden' among us, would no longer be able to stay hidden, and a new age of peace would come. [/quote] Bravo, B! Bravo.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 13, 2009 6:12:28 GMT -5
If I had more disposable moolah, and the show was at a smaller venue, I'd consider going. I saw him at Veteran's Stadium in Philly, in 1989, and it was great. But it was also sort of awful, due to the fact that baseball stadiums are made for BASEBALL! ;D Are you going to see him on this go round, B?
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 12, 2009 8:04:15 GMT -5
He's a paid disinfo shill. Great work, if you can get it.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 11, 2009 15:54:41 GMT -5
Lois La(i)ne and Jimmy Olsen, eh? I was going for Hutch. As in Starsky and...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 11, 2009 14:58:44 GMT -5
I LOVED Chumley's, B. It was dark, dank, and had TONS of character. Interestingly enough, it suffered the same fate as WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7. It collapsed in 2007. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chumley%27sI miss it. As for the Avalon. It used to be the Limelight. This is Miss La(i)ne and me at the Limelight for Halloween, 2007.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 11, 2009 14:48:52 GMT -5
As some of you may know in the Coming Up video Bill assembled a backing band consisting of multiple versions of himself pointing to the idea of doubles. I just found out that he uses the same trick in the ebony and ivory video. Funny how I never caught that one. Coming Up www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr8x8rh4ywsEbony And Ivory www.youtube.com/watch?v=sssqBjaTzOUFunny how it is written "Plastic Macs" on the drumkit in Coming Up, referencing the Plastic Ono Band. And in my culture plastic is also a word for fake. I've asked this before but never got a clear answer, when did McCartney start having the nickname Macca? I'm sure it was somewhere in the late 60s early 70s. In science fiction the word Mecha (similar to Macca) is used to describe a robot who could pass for a human being, like the word android. And the bamker never wears a mac in the pouring rain, very strange I'm back, sending a smile to all my dearies All love jan Interesting stuff, Jan.
I've never found a satisfying explanation for the Macca nickname.
Here's what Wikipedia has to say:Macca (or "Macker" in Ireland) is a common British nickname for somebody whose surname begins with the Gaelic prefix Mac or Mc (meaning "son of"). It is similar in form to Gazza, Hezza and similar nicknames that arose during the 1990s and early 21st century. People frequently referred to as Macca include: * Sir Paul McCartney, musician * Amy Macdonald, singer * Steve McClaren, ex-England football manager * Andrew McLeod, Australian rules footballer and two-time Norm Smith Medallist * Nathan McKenzie, All-Australian Superstar and Brownlow Medallist * Steve McManaman, footballer sometimes also called 'El Macca' * Stephen McPhail, footballer * Gary McAllister, former footballer and manager * Macbeth of Scotland, former Scottish king and Shakespearean tragic hero * Gary McSheffery, footballer * Chris McCormack, Australian triathlete * Michael "Macca" MacKenzie, a fictional recurring character on the Australian soap opera Home and Away * Steve McMahon, former footballer * Bruce McAvaney, Australian Sports Media Broadcaster * Neil McKenzie, South African Cricketer * Paul McNamee, Former Australian Tennis Player, now Sports Administrator This is from WikiAnswers:"It was a nickname John had for him. If you think of how a british person would say "McCartney", like McCahhtney (no Rs) it's shortened to McCaahh, or Macca " As for Mecha...Mecha are generally, though not necessarily, bipedal, with arms, hands, and fingers capable of grasping objects. A mecha that approximates the shape of a human body allows the use of martial arts movements and swordsmanship, ceremonial acts of honor, saluting, and other human mannerisms that cannot be performed using a tank or airplane. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecha
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 11, 2009 11:42:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 11, 2009 9:55:58 GMT -5
Also, Diana Dors dress, a lovely gold lamé, isn't really a dress at all. It looks like one; it's really an OWL. That was sweet Doc. I love it. The drum is not a drum. It is a golf ball on a tee. -j It's interesting that the first row is flanked by Diana and her twin brother SUNny (Apollo Creed) Liston.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 10, 2009 15:58:58 GMT -5
I have recently read that those orchestrating the NWO are of the bloodline of the ancient Pharaohs... que sera, sera. You don't say...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 10, 2009 10:15:13 GMT -5
jarvitronics wrote: " I can give you the skeptical version or I can give you the bat shit crazy version." "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, even if it's bat-shit crazy, must be the truth!" Are-Thor Conman Foil So here's where I think P(D)enny went off the tracks. He wrote:"There are lots of clues pointing to McCartney selling his soul in order to facilitate the birth of Lucifer's spawn." I don't agree. Let's consider this matter in light of the notion that the 'illuminatists' are required to inform the public of their intentions in some way, even if their message is not overt. So, for example, a Simpson's episode with 911 clues is shown, even before the event happens etc. This, apparently, serves as sufficient public notice for the dark magicians to go ahead with their plans. Now we have the Time magazine, "Is God Dead?" edition from April 8, 1966 prophecying God's death on Nov. 9th of that year, and this news is mirrored on the Pepper drum I ONE IX HE<>DIE or possibly 11/9 ( Nov. 9) he die. (P(D)enny's words)the following summer. Pepper, then, is a depiction of God's funeral and burial. A yellow flower arrangement on the cover asks if the one who died is "Paul?", 'though it seems 'The Beatles' may also be the deceased, having been replaced by Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Cl ub Band. Ergo: From the viewpoint of an 'illuminist', the public has been told that the death of God prophecied in Time magazine the year before has, indeed, take place, and society is now moving "Toward a Hidden God". And (quoting P(D)enny La(i)ne)"Since Rosemary is carrying Lucifer's spawn while she's reading this magazine, in a movie that has all of the other connections that I pointed out earlier, this is another link between Rosemary's Baby, Sgt. Pepper, and Lucifer reborn. "So symbolicly Lucifer's 'son' has been born, (Rosemary having been delivered), coinciding with the baptism of Faul (presumably), shown a year after Pepper, on the White Album poster. So Sgt. Pepper's band is being led by the 'sonofthemagickian' Lucifer Jr/Crowley/Faul. So to recap: God is now dead. 'Paul?' and The Beatles are dead. Lucifer's son has 'been born' with the baptism of Faul into the role of 'Lucifer's son' as well as the 'Paul' in the faux-Beatles Sgt. Pepper band. Now borrowing from jarvitronics and the Mormons, in as much as jarv has said the Pepper cover can be understood from a Mormon perspective, we have the TWO BROTHERS Paul (with the sad looking early Beatles looking on), leader of the Beatles, and Faul, son of Lucifer leading the Pepper band, on the Pepper cover. And in Mormon-think, Lucifer and Christ are brothers. Adversaries - yes, but brothers none-the-less. So we have Faul standing in for Lucifer, and Paul standing in for Christ, it would seem. And while the Paul/Beatles death made room for the arrival of Faul/Pepper band, I can't say that I see that Paul "sold himself to the devil" to allow it to happen. If anyone "sold themself" to the devil, it would seem to be John, who moved into The Dakota, where Rosemary had her baby (at least, in the movie), and who, according to one account, was upset with Roman Polanski for some reason. www.phinnweb.org/livingroom/rosemary/print.html"At a party in California in 1973, Lennon ‘went berserk, hurling a chair out the window, smashing mirrors, heaving a TV against the wall, and screaming nonsense about film director Roman Polanski being to blame’ - Giuliano" So perhaps John blamed Roman Polanski for causing him to get involved with people who were responsible for Paul's death. Or, we might speculate, that John "sold himself to the devil", by dealing with Roman Polanski, not knowing it would result in Paul's death, or even that he was "selling himself" to the devil in the process of being involved with Polanski without knowing it. [And yes, I said "process" on purpose, since "the Process" (church) is the Manson connection.] Paul, it would seem, was an innocent, and even portrayed as "the fool on the hill". In the Tarot, "The Fool" card represents someone who is inexperienced; someone learning the ropes, and subject to making errors innocently. It does not represent a schemer in any way. So we might consider Paul as 'the innocent' who was sacrificed. While Faul, the magician, came in his stead, with wisdom and knowledge, but not innocence. However we are told in the song 'Fool on the Hill' that although Paul appears to be dead outwardly, 'the eyes in his head see the world spinning round', and so on. (Who is dead? Who appears to be dead? At this TIME?) Now if Faul is Lucifer's son, is Paul Christ's son, in Mormon-think? I'll post some thoughts shortly. (We're having thunder storms. )B, I've always tried my best to steer clear of trying to discern the motivations of people I don't know, so I can't really give you a good reason for why Paul may have willingly played a part in this (by volunteering to sell his soul). And I agree that Paul always did seem like a genuinely nice guy. Regarding the Fool, I think that it was Faul who was the Fool, not Paul. The Faul On the Hill ;D I will say say, however, that I don't mind the idea of John being to one to have sold his buddy (Paul) out in return for their success. After all, Lennon DID have the famous Polanski blowup that you mentioned, and he always DID seem to be a VERY conflicted person, in general, and specifically towards Paul/Faul. I suppose that an internal struggle over selling his buddy's soul in return for success could easily account for a lot of his anger and conflict. And of course, Lennon was the one who moved into the Dakota. WITH A WITCH. Hmmmm.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 10, 2009 10:01:34 GMT -5
Yes, and the Hebrew name/word for "dove" is "Jonah." "Dove" was sent by God to Nineveh (Fish-town) to preach repentence so that they might have "shalom" (National Security). Dove was trapped in the body of the Big Fish (ger Dag), until the Fish threw him up on dry land. Dag is fish; Dagon (like Ore-gon and Penta-gon) means Fish-God. After so many months, Noah opened the window of the Ark and released "Jonah" out of the sealed boat to go out to find dry land. On the second try, the Dove brought back an Olive Branch to Noah (Rest). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_symbolwww.ao.net/~fmoeller/zec4.htmgives us: "Olive branches." Hebrew "shibboliym," , translated branches only once in the Bible, here in this place, always elsewhere translated ears or heads of grain. It means heads of wheat or ears of corn and the imagery pictures the olive trees as though they are so clustered with olives that they appear to be "shibboliym," or each tree as one large head of grain. So much fruit do they contain for the production of oil!
Messiach, Christos both connote "annointed one." Annointed with oil. Often olive oil.
Doves. Oil. Peace. Dry land. Fish.
All these symbols.
"Doves. Oil. Peace. Dry land. [/color] Fish.
All these symbols."
cool, doc! Semolina Pilchard, climbing up the Eiffel Tower www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JC7lmDXmIM&feature=relatedI've also considered perhaps "semolina" could refer to " manna" and pilcher meaning : A scabbard, as of a sword. [Obs.] Shak.the other eiffel [/quote] A bit of Statue of Liberty esoterica: The statue was a gift from the French Grand Orient Temple Masons. www.freemasonrywatch.org/statue_of_liberty.htmlLady Liberty (Columbia?) sits on an 11-pointed pedestal, and she is 111'1" from her heel to the top of her head. Torch: a symbol of enlightenment ( Illumination?). Rays of Crown: The seven rays represent the seven seas and continents of the world. And we all know by now that there are seven levels www.nps.gov/stli/historyculture/statue-statistics.htm
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 9, 2009 14:52:59 GMT -5
I don't know why this never occurred to me before, but the word "Peppers" in Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band contains no possessive apostrophe. The apostrophe is present everywhere except the drum head. The printed lyrics have the apostrophe. The record label has the apostrophe. Even the spine has the apostrophe. The drum head has other quirks, such as the large gap between the L and the U in the word "CL UB" -j I mentioned that, Jarv, but I should have been more clear that it was ONLY on the bass drum: "The version on the bass drum though, is the version that's specifically incorrect." It's possible that they just liked the aesthetics of the apostrophe-less Peppers, so they left it off of the decorative bass drum, but I tend to think that it's a deliberately placed clue to *something*.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 8, 2009 12:05:22 GMT -5
Here's the latest installment. Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation Part XV June 6, 2009 The Byrds were the very first folk-rock band to take flight, and the one that achieved the greatest fame, but to many discerning ears, Laurel Canyon’s other folk-rock powerhouse, the Buffalo Springfield, was the more talented band. In the literature chronicling the 1960s music scene, few stories are repeated more frequently than the legend surrounding the formation of what would later be regarded as perhaps the first ‘supergroup.’ All such accounts unquestioningly retell the story as though it were the gospel truth, seemingly oblivious to the improbability of virtually every aspect of the legend. And curiously, virtually every version of the story contains some form of the word “serendipity,” as though everyone has been copying off the same kid’s homework. As the story goes, Stephen Stills and Richie Furay, formerly of the Au Go-Go Singers, had recently transplanted themselves to Los Angeles after the breakup of the manufactured folkie group. Stills had been the first to relocate, in August of 1965. Furay flew out to join him in February 1966, after spending a little time working at defense giant Pratt & Whitney, and the two set their sights on putting together a folk-rock band. More: www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr107.html
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 8, 2009 10:45:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 7, 2009 12:55:18 GMT -5
Just one thing comes to mind there P(Denny) - It is quite common in Britain to attach nick-names to people based on their surname if it allows. For instance Epstein would and could be Eppers. F'rinstance "Heeheehee every time I see my Paul Simon now, all I can think of is when Brian Epstein refused to manage him because (as he explained in an aside to Alistair Taylor), Paul looked "too Jewish."
Like there's such a thing? Like that's a BAD thing, Martha Stewart???
Oh, Eppers, you are a real pip, you are! ani laughing smiley"
eppylover.livejournal.com/345365.html
I get what you're saying about the nick name, thisone. Even so, it *should* be possessive. Even if the chap's nick name is Peppers. Example: Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band is wrong. The Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band would be correct. and Sgt. Peppers 's Lonely Hearts Club Band would also be correct. The version on the bass drum though, is the version that's specifically incorrect. Think of it as if it were someone's name that didn't end with an s. For instance: Paul McCartney Lonely Hearts Club Band is wrong. The Paul McCartney Lonely Hearts Club Band would be correct. Paul McCartney 's Lonely Hearts Club Band would also be correct. But again, Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band is just wrong. Conspicuously wrong, IMO. Oh, and sorry to be such a pedantic freak.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 7, 2009 7:08:30 GMT -5
a gift from a friend, to you "It was an idea I had, I THINK when I was FLYING from LA to SOMEWHERE. I thought it would be nice TO LOSE OUR INDENTITIES, to SUBMERGE OURSELVES in the PERSONA OF A FAKE GROUP. WE WOULD MAKE UP ALL THE CULTURE around it, and collect ALL OUR HEROES in ONE PLACE......JUST A 'WORD GAME', REALLY" JUST A 'WORD GAME', REALLYI don't know why this never occurred to me before, but the word "Peppers" in Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band contains no possessive apostrophe. Is the Sgt's last name actually Peppers, WITH the s, as opposed to Sgt. Pepper? Is the lack of apostrophe just an honest mistake, or is this another deliberately placed clue telling us to look for MULTIPLE Sgt. Peppers? Incidentally, R.E.M. omitted an apostrophe on their 1986 album, Lifes Rich Pageant, and of course the LAST song on that album is Superman. I am, I am Superman, and I know what's happening I am, I am I am Superman, and I can do anything
You don't really love that guy you make it with now do you I know you don't love that guy cause I can see right through you
If you go a million miles away I'll track you down girl Trust me when I say I know the pathway to your heart Superman was a cover of a song originally released in 1969. It was written by Mitchell Bottler and Gary Zekley, and recorded by The Clique. From Wiki: The Clique are a late 1960s U.S. sunshine pop band from Houston, Texas.
The group was centered around record producer/songwriter Gary Zekley, who often employed session musicians. Their self-titled album, The Clique (1969), released by White Whale Records, featured the singles "I'll Hold Out My Hand" and "Sugar on Sunday" which reached #45 and #22 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 chart, respectively. So, will Paul be back as Superman?
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 5, 2009 22:31:23 GMT -5
But are you suggesting that the geometry was placed there intentionally by the Beatles, or through some sort of subtle message from the universe? Perhaps both. Maybe it was placed there intentionally by The Beatles as a message from the universe. I guess it all depends on what one believes about The Beatles and the universe. I can give you the skeptical version or I can give you the bat shit crazy version. -j But I want your opinion. What do YOU think is the answer? You know, like if someone had their heel on your cat's throat and was demanding that you give them your opinion on this. ;D
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 5, 2009 20:53:07 GMT -5
I also think that the universe runs on a basic set of rules, involving numbers, mathematics, geometry, and a fundamental concept of polarity. I further believe that some people have figured out how to manipulate these rules, and that this is what we call magick. -j Jarv, You quoted me and then responded with your (ingeniously) superimposed geometry. "I also think that the universe runs on a basic set of rules, involving numbers, mathematics, geometry, and a fundamental concept of polarity.
I further believe that some people have figured out how to manipulate these rules, and that this is what we call magick." But are you suggesting that the geometry was placed there intentionally by the Beatles, or through some sort of subtle message from the universe?
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 4, 2009 14:31:05 GMT -5
I just tried it with "Paul" and got some hits. I've used it several times this week, including this morning. Hmmmm.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 4, 2009 8:36:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 4, 2009 8:19:15 GMT -5
Oooohh... Just came across this... http://news.bbc.co.u k/1/hi/world/europe/3024327.stm "There were all sorts of things: film reels, videos. We took the diary, a pair of boots and some music paper and made off while our friends were keeping watch outside," Paola de Fazi said.I wonder what size the boots were!
|
|