|
Post by JoJo on Jun 16, 2009 14:44:21 GMT -5
The Ebay bidder's best friend: www.auctionsniper.com/Might not help much here, as it will probably get up into four figures. I have to wonder if the "no reserve" business is because he shilled his own auction. Not making any accusations of course, just wondering.. It does look to be pretty untouched, so probably the never opened part is true.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 15, 2009 20:34:16 GMT -5
" no longer the study of clues in song lyrics, album covers, photos etc to determine whether we believe JPM was replaced, why and how it happened and if they were trying to tell us.[/color] & it still is, but we have been around the globe on that one. Not to say that IF something new "sheds light" we wouldn't pay attention. Or contrubite our vast knowledge (LOL) to "the cause"?[/quote] Oh yes.. We HAVE been around the earth and then some! Everything here and here has some post here or at TKIN attached to it. So, and not to pat myself on the back, but I did some heavy lifting in my day. Some was crap in retrospect and some was not, but the point was to lay out whatever I thought might be relevant to our discussion. Thing is, if you want to revisit "evidence discussing" then it's all here on the forum, just look around. After all these years, it might be a good idea to revive some old threads rather than simply repeat ourselves with no tribute to the discussion that already took place.. Am I wrong? If something new comes up as Iameye says then yes.. But of course it's worth a look. If the goal is to prove a preconceived notion, i.e. that Paul was replaced, then we are handicapped by putting conclusions ahead of a thorough examination of evidence. If on the other hand, the goal is to decode what is actually there, then it seems that an examination of mysticism is unavoidable.Bravo Jarv, yes it's a good idea to put aside preconceptions for sure.. But at this late date it's almost impossible to not have reached a conclusion or two.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 15, 2009 20:13:56 GMT -5
Looks like it could be some fun. I don't understand the length.. (22 minutes) How do you release something that short to theaters? Could be they will release to DVD or even download, but there's no info I could find other than it will be out on June 18. www.imdb.com/title/tt1378367/It's the perfect length for a 30 minute US TeeVee slot. Yeah that makes sense. Wish they'd drop the air of mystery and say how you are supposed to view it already.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 15, 2009 15:36:47 GMT -5
Looks like it could be some fun. I don't understand the length.. (22 minutes) How do you release something that short to theaters? Could be they will release to DVD or even download, but there's no info I could find other than it will be out on June 18. www.imdb.com/title/tt1378367/
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 14, 2009 20:06:10 GMT -5
Excellent, congrats!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 14, 2009 19:50:45 GMT -5
That clip from Sir Paul's Howard Stern appearance was probably the first time he mentioned that story of meeting Yoko before John did. I believe he felt the need to set the record straight after 30 plus years.. Notice how John feels the need to jump in with the "Ringo means apple" comment before Yoko can continue. A bit defensive, no? John always felt the need to defend Yoko against the "Yoko is a gold digger" crowd, so he kept driving the point that Yoko knew nothing about the Beatles before they met. Nothing?
IMO we would have seen a Beatles reunion in the 70's if John had stayed with May Pang. Probably would have seen one in the 80's if John had lived, and also John on Howard Stern (after divorcing Yoko) talking about what a PIA being married to her was..
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 12, 2009 17:00:44 GMT -5
70 is the new 30 too! ( hey, let's start that one NOW) Absolutely, it will come in handy for me in 23 years. Yikes, not so far away!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 11, 2009 20:07:36 GMT -5
Hey, thanks. For the wish and for delaying 40 by two days. Not so old yet, didn't you hear it's the new 30?? ;D
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 11, 2009 17:27:39 GMT -5
Yes Hi Jan, glad to see ya! Darned if that video doesn't have multiple Bills, you're right. If you're like me, it's probably not one of your favorite songs, so that's why you missed it.. Well he has fun with the concept, just did it with Ever Present Past.
Jarv, he wears a plastic band around his.. wrist really.. to this day. Guess "hand" rhymes better?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 9, 2009 17:43:03 GMT -5
Whoops, two days ago and I missed the reminder. Sorry about that, hope you had a great one!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 8, 2009 16:25:18 GMT -5
Hey, if glasses can work for Clark Kent... Lol, I thought the same thing. Maybe Neil borrowed the idea.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 6, 2009 22:25:23 GMT -5
And about the "Beatle Ed" thing, when John first says it, George laughs, and the second time he says it he points at George, making me belive that "Ed" was just a stupid nickname John gave to George. Anyone who knows if George had anything at number 5 in sweden at that time? (I should know, because i'm actually swedish) Beatle Ed doesn't refer to George, pretty sure, pointing in that direction notwithstanding. Sounds like Beatle Ed is someone John is making thinly veiled verbal jabs at.. (that's Beatle Ed on the table, peeping Ed, head of EMI, etc.) Or, "Beatle Ed is number five in Sweden.. very progressive" So, riddle me this, why is Sweden very progressive if Beatle Ed is "number five" there?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 6, 2009 22:14:29 GMT -5
For what it's worth, Neil Aspinal claimed this was Paul, playing a prank by disguising himself at a restaurant in Sweden and pretending to be some madcap photographer. He claimed Paul was 19, so this would be 1961 or '62.. From Neil himself: LINKNeil said no one in their group (himself, John George and Pete I would assume) recognized Paul with his glasses and mustache.. Makes very little sense if you think about it. I guess Neil is saying a mustache makes someone unrecognizable? (it's really him, you just don't recognize with this amazing disguise)
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 5, 2009 20:13:02 GMT -5
As I said on another thread, (in this section) if you want to dig deeper time-wise, confine yourself to one board, don't search the entire forum. More work, but likely better results.
For example, the last page of General has a thread about Todd Loren, a good 5 years ago. So, I uncheck all, then check General only.. Put Loren in the search box, then give 2500 days as the amount to dig, and I indeed got the Loren thread. It did give a timeout error message on the first try, and you have to make a series of educated guesses about which board it will be on.. But it works.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 5, 2009 16:33:56 GMT -5
The coastline part of New York City is not green, so there is perhaps some artistic decision made there. I guess I saw a profile because it reminded me of a rock formation here in NH (now gone, it slid off the mountain) that was called "The Old Man Of The Mountain". (you can Google if curious)
I think the hand is more to the side of Paul's head, and it's probably depicting that hand signal from the Yellow Sub artwork where John gives what some people believe is the "devil sign" or some such..
You don't have to be a believer to be informed of the details involved.. could have thrown them in there for whatever reason.. Could be for shits and giggles.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 4, 2009 20:27:38 GMT -5
news.bostonherald.com/track/inside_track/view/2009_06_04_Is_Paul_McCartney_on_the_run_______to_Fenway_Park_/srvc=home&position=alsoSee you there? Don’t breathe a word of this. Because nobody’s supposed to know. But word from Yawkey Way is that Sir Paul McCartney will play two dates at Fenway Park [map] in August. Yeah, yeah, yeah!
Fenway management has applied to the city for a license to hold a concert - complete with pyrotechnics - at the old ballyard Aug. 5 and 6 when the Red Sox [team stats] are in Tampa and New York.
Although no headliner is named in the application, word is, the former Beatle will play Fenway for the very first time.
Patricia Malone, director of the Mayor’s Office of Consumer Affairs and Licensing, acknowledged that “there are rumors” about McCartney, but she said the Sox suits aren’t expected to reveal the name of the act until a public hearing June 22 at City Hall.
Adding more fuel to the Beatlemania is that Sir Paul, 66, yesterday announced he’s playing Citi Field, the new home of the New York Mets, on July 17 and 18.
The event in the Apple has a sense of history to it. The Fab Four played the first concert at Shea Stadium in 1965. And last summer Sir Paul returned to the ballpark as a surprise guest at Billy Joel’s Last Play concert at Shea.
“I am really excited about playing Citi Field,” McCartney said in a press release. “The Beatles were the first to play at Shea Stadium and, along with Billy Joel, I was the last to sing at the old Shea. So to be the first to play this stadium is incredible. I am really looking forward to a buzzing show.”
Hmmm.
The Sir Paul party at Fenway in August could be LiveNation’s peace offering to the Sox after stiffing them on the Billy Joel-Elton John Face 2 Face tour which kicks off at Gillette Stadium July 18. Also rocking the Razor in the next few months: U2 .
File Under: It Won’t Be Long?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 4, 2009 19:46:54 GMT -5
From the guest section: JoJo, One other thing in the game promo is the hand behind Paul's head on top of the elephant 2:40 at the very end of the video. An elephant never forgets. The elephant is about to walk off the cliff with the Beatles standing on its head.. And as they fly into New York, the coastline has a profile:
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 4, 2009 14:14:19 GMT -5
I just tried it with "Paul" and got some hits.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 3, 2009 20:28:50 GMT -5
Hah, this thing is absolutely wild. "Surgery".... (and hey IAAP fans, something to make ya crazy, a suitcase) All day breakfast price: ' 1 & 1 is 2' Follow the sun.. (and a bit Klaatuesque I think) Tuesday:
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 1, 2009 19:52:18 GMT -5
Gotta wonder if the artists working with the models notice anything, they have to pay attention to minute details. Or is it just that's the way he looked then and then.. and that's just how it is.
It's a fun game, give the cheap PC version a try if you don't partake.. If you love the music, makes it easier and more enjoyable.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 1, 2009 17:24:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on May 31, 2009 19:58:05 GMT -5
Well, I'm still paying off student loans and trying to figure out how this is going to come out of my budget. I've got to get moth the stereo and mono box sets, and somehow get the most ridiculously expensive Rock Band bundle on the same day. Well, so I don't own any gaming system, so I'll have to spend some serious money to get this together. Last time I bought something that hooked up to the TV, it had a couple of knobs, and played pong.. So I bought Guitar Hero for the Mac, way cheaper and just so I can work on my skill set and see if I actually would like playing this game. Damn addictive.. Guess you can teach an old dog new tricks.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on May 29, 2009 17:37:47 GMT -5
The library computer must have Java turned off on the browser. You could turn it on if they haven't locked out patrons from doing so. Or, ask the librarian to fix it? There is also the option of inserting the code manually, here is a bit of info: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBCode
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on May 29, 2009 7:03:11 GMT -5
OK, well.. I believe you. But your experiences do show that the average person(s) employed in this do indeed give themselves away.. And don't care either which is puzzling to me. I'm in a funny position, in that I'm outside a lot, in the public eye, and people are always watching what I'm doing. (I'll explain privately if you like) So, anything targeting me personally would disappear into the background noise of my everyday life. Good that you moved out of this situation. It seems like perhaps it was all about getting you to move for the friend, although to go to these extremes is amazing, you understand why the average person first hearing about this would find it hard to believe.. And yet it happened, so there you are. If this continues in your new place, especially the business of walking into your place, (which is clearly illegal btw) set up a web cam to take video non-stop while you are away. Personally, my method of defense would involve a baseball bat and a trip by the perpetrator to the emergency room, but that's just me.. Good luck Girl, and let us know what happens.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on May 27, 2009 20:52:34 GMT -5
Never heard of it, so of course Googled: www.gangstalkingworld.com/United/index.php/Main/GS101 I don't even know if I should be discussing it here (or anywhere, for that matter) but well I've "known" some of you for quite a long time... well I mean, realistically how much can you know someone on the net, right? Maybe 1/2 of us are psychopaths... Well, I'm not crazy, just ask Letter B.. If this is happening to you on the net, do what I do.. Don't concern yourself. Yeah I can get annoyed when someone picks a fight, argues, etc. but the level of concern doesn't rise beyond that. But, it sounds like the description of gang stalking intrudes into the real world with real people taking time to monitor the targeted individual. I dunno, this sounds very labor intensive, and are there enough unemployed people (because you'd have to be to have the time, current events notwithstanding) to put the effort into this task? If enough people are employed to monitor the victim 24/7, then it should become obvious to the person being stalked? Only highly trained personnel can really pull off observing someone without being noticed, the average person would be obvious and clumsy about it. If I saw a lot of this going on around me, I'd walk up to the person watching me and say hey... Why are you watching me? If this is for real, then it belies the argument that conspiracies can't exist because a large group of people couldn't keep the information secret.. But I'm dubious about ordinary people going on "for years" examining someone without the person being aware.
|
|